Page 1 of 1

Question About The BBBofC......

Posted: 23 Jul 2011, 15:03
by keithmoonhangover
Do the BBBofC have a rule stating that foriegn imports cannot be 40 or over?

Re: Question About The BBBofC......

Posted: 23 Jul 2011, 15:11
by damianhucker1
keithmoonhangover wrote:Do the BBBofC have a rule stating that foriegn imports cannot be 40 or over?
unwritten maybe otherwise it could be construed as discrimination

Re: Question About The BBBofC......

Posted: 23 Jul 2011, 15:45
by Adamj1987
not sure but there doesnt seem to be too many over 40 imports

Re: Question About The BBBofC......

Posted: 23 Jul 2011, 16:27
by Darcy Delaney
I don't think there is i remember Dean Powell talking about it a few years ago,(2000) I think it was to do with the Super Featherweight Affif Djelti when he came over to fight Charles Shepherd, they were talking about his age and whether he should be aloud to box/medicals ect ect

Re: Question About The BBBofC......

Posted: 24 Jul 2011, 03:56
by dondada
I don't think so.

Even if it did exist, it would soon go out of the window if B-Hop wanted to come over, for instance.

Re: Question About The BBBofC......

Posted: 24 Jul 2011, 04:00
by crusader
Someone suggested they did when the Botha was turned down, but I could never find anything that supported this.

Re: Question About The BBBofC......

Posted: 24 Jul 2011, 04:04
by Final round
Age was a factor with Botha but he was mainly turned down due to wear and tear he had accrued over his long career.
Holyfield would get turned down too.

Re: Question About The BBBofC......

Posted: 24 Jul 2011, 04:25
by REAL_DEAL
Japan does but not sure on the age

Re: Question About The BBBofC......

Posted: 25 Jul 2011, 08:30
by boxingchat
It's to do with their insurance policy. If a fighter is a recognised world champion and active they would allow it. When the fighter could be considered 'an acident waiting to happen' the the Board don't want the liability which is right.

I don't think Holyfield would be allowed in.

Re: Question About The BBBofC......

Posted: 25 Jul 2011, 08:32
by DavidPayne
They said Tyson wouldn't because of his convictions. In the end money talked and he was permitted.

I'd be surprised if they turned down Holyfield personally.

Re: Question About The BBBofC......

Posted: 25 Jul 2011, 08:35
by keithmoonhangover
boxingchat wrote:It's to do with their insurance policy. If a fighter is a recognised world champion and active they would allow it. When the fighter could be considered 'an acident waiting to happen' the the Board don't want the liability which is right.

I don't think Holyfield would be allowed in.
He's the WBF Champion and the board have sanctioned WBF title fights before.

I know Holyfield is miles past his prime, but I'd rather he fought someone of Fury's quality than get in there with Wladimir.

Re: Question About The BBBofC......

Posted: 25 Jul 2011, 08:43
by LeedsLad
I don't think Holyfield is an accident waiting to happen.

I mean, he's pretty much beyond shot but is still capable of being competitive and indeed successful at a certain level.

If we allow fighters like Polakevic and Tolhstis in to fight Olympic medallists when realistically they'd struggle with a pub drunk I think Holyfield should be allowed to box here.

The board have made some good decisions, preventing Earl from fighting Katsidis again being a good example. Now I hope they start on the journeymen that aren't ever competitive - they don't do the sport any favours.