Page 1 of 1

Strictly newsflash! Bookies strongly fancy Audley...

Posted: 07 Sep 2011, 10:44
by dondada

Re: Strictly newsflash! Bookies strongly fancy Audley...

Posted: 07 Sep 2011, 11:18
by steve68
I firmly believe that Audley has the talent to be the best ballroom dancer the world's ever seen. Possibly.

Re: Strictly newsflash! Bookies strongly fancy Audley...

Posted: 07 Sep 2011, 11:39
by tonyevs
I think he`ll be a star on the program ... the guy may not dance too good ... but he is sure a character the public will love to hate :TU:

Its these type of opportunities that boxers are missing out on by not fighting on the BBC or ITV.
Bruno and Cooper made a large part of their money from such things ..

Re: Strictly newsflash! Bookies strongly fancy Audley...

Posted: 07 Sep 2011, 11:44
by Old bones Ian
I watched a bit of the rehersals on BBC, and lets just say that Audley isn't going to win

Re: Strictly newsflash! Bookies strongly fancy Audley...

Posted: 07 Sep 2011, 12:25
by stevek3lly
If his dancing is as bad as his boxing then he should make an even bigger tit out of himself than he already is.

Re: Strictly newsflash! Bookies strongly fancy Audley...

Posted: 07 Sep 2011, 12:50
by tonyevs
MachoMan09 wrote:
tonyevs wrote:Its these type of opportunities that boxers are missing out on by not fighting on the BBC or ITV.
Bruno and Cooper made a large part of their money from such things ..
What, the opportunity to commit three/four months of their time to a reality television show? Any active sportsman with even a drop of ambition remaining wouldn't go near such a programme. I'm sure neither Cooper nor Bruno committed that much time to TV work, in a single stint, and perhaps in totality, during either their active or retired periods.

What I meant was - if they were fighting on mainstream TV channels. They would be offered such opportunities.
How much did Henry Cooper add to his bank account through the years with his TV appearances and Brut 33 adverts?? I`m sure it was alot more than most ex-boxers of similar status were earning away from TV.
Nowadays celebrities are quite often merely former realityTV contestants .. a former well known champion with charisma is surely more deserving to the `Celebrity` status .. and payday, than any of these??
Of course they wouldn`t ideally do it whilst still active - but Mayweather and Holyfield previously did so.

Re: Strictly newsflash! Bookies strongly fancy Audley...

Posted: 07 Sep 2011, 13:04
by freddydoesdallas
"Harrison may have had the fancy footwork in the ring but we can't see him landing the killer blow here.
This is awful and as such i'm closing my ladbrokes account

Re: Strictly newsflash! Bookies strongly fancy Audley...

Posted: 07 Sep 2011, 14:19
by jameswilson
Cardiff-Lad1 wrote:
MachoMan09 wrote:The BBC are going to get their own back on that contract. They are a spiteful bunch of communist bastards, in my view, and seeing as how sending Audley to a gulag is beyond their mandate, they'll simply order Len Goodman, Alesha Dixon and those two mincers to verbally assassinate him in front of an audience of millions.
Seems fair enough to me. :TU:

I truely believe that Audley taking their 1 million quid with poor results is one of the main reasons that the BBC want nothing to do with boxing anymore.
I firmly believe your talking bollocks. If the BBC offered Audley that money then it's the BBC that are the mugs. Don't go making out you wouldn't say 'yeah happy with that' if they offered you a million. When they got out of boxing BBC were showing David Haye's fights live, Mick Hennesy's bigger bills and Audley's fights. If it was all on Audley then they would have just ditched him and kept the others on. It was low figures across the board, not just some of Audley's fights.

Re: Strictly newsflash! Bookies strongly fancy Audley...

Posted: 07 Sep 2011, 14:56
by milpool
Looking at his outfit...is that a simulation of his highly regarded WBF 'world' heavyweight title around his waist?

Re: Strictly newsflash! Bookies strongly fancy Audley...

Posted: 07 Sep 2011, 14:58
by Old bones Ian
Russell Grant to win by KO.

Re: Strictly newsflash! Bookies strongly fancy Audley...

Posted: 07 Sep 2011, 15:25
by black panther
You can get 80-1 on Audley to win the thing if you're feeling the (A) Force. Though I believe the 2/1 for him to go first would be money better spent! :lol:

Re: Strictly newsflash! Bookies strongly fancy Audley...

Posted: 07 Sep 2011, 16:21
by jameswilson
black panther wrote:You can get 80-1 on Audley to win the thing if you're feeling the (A) Force. Though I believe the 2/1 for him to go first would be money better spent! :lol:
I think a bet against him going first would be a decent bet, if he is the favourite to go first. Don't forget what Brits do in these voting systems, keep the shite ones in for comic effect. John Sergeant, Jedward, Rage against the machine xmas number 1 etc etc.

Re: Strictly newsflash! Bookies strongly fancy Audley...

Posted: 07 Sep 2011, 16:37
by IRLangmaid25
As a regular viewer of Strictly (but I do not watch it Live as I am normally in the pub with my dad) I have seen it done too many times, when the judges utterly flay someone in front of 8-10 million viewers which are usual viewing figures for it, and that generates alot of sympathy from the viewers who as a result vote en masse to keep them in at the expense of the better dancers see Anne Widdecombe who was terrible, John Sargeant the BBC Political Correspondent (who was partnered with Joe Calzaghe's missus) who was even worse and Kate Garroway who were all kept in at the expense of the much better celebs. Mind you there is a decent amount of totty on it this year mind you.

As for Audley Harrison, during his career in the paid ranks I often found myself banging head against the wall. Because when you look at him all the raw attributes were they here, height, reach, good jab, power and critically the southpaw stance and you do not get many southpaw heavyweights do you, and I thought he was going to go an awful long way. But alas it did not work out for one reason or another so he will go down as one of the great unfufilled talents in boxing.

Re: Strictly newsflash! Bookies strongly fancy Audley...

Posted: 08 Sep 2011, 04:34
by dondada
jameswilson wrote:
Cardiff-Lad1 wrote:
MachoMan09 wrote:The BBC are going to get their own back on that contract. They are a spiteful bunch of communist bastards, in my view, and seeing as how sending Audley to a gulag is beyond their mandate, they'll simply order Len Goodman, Alesha Dixon and those two mincers to verbally assassinate him in front of an audience of millions.
Seems fair enough to me. :TU:

I truely believe that Audley taking their 1 million quid with poor results is one of the main reasons that the BBC want nothing to do with boxing anymore.
I firmly believe your talking bollocks. If the BBC offered Audley that money then it's the BBC that are the mugs. Don't go making out you wouldn't say 'yeah happy with that' if they offered you a million. When they got out of boxing BBC were showing David Haye's fights live, Mick Hennesy's bigger bills and Audley's fights. If it was all on Audley then they would have just ditched him and kept the others on. It was low figures across the board, not just some of Audley's fights.
I got all the figures from the BBC for that time period. Audley started OK and then absolutely tanked.

I don't blame him for taking the money, of course. He talked a lot and was sh1t though.

The BBC just didn't understand what they were getting into.

Re: Strictly newsflash! Bookies strongly fancy Audley...

Posted: 08 Sep 2011, 08:07
by jameswilson
Cardiff-Lad1 wrote: I guess thats my point exactly - With each fight the figures got worse (ish) and by the end i guess the BBC wanted no more to do with it. Jameswilson - Are you honestly saying that there was as little interest in the other fights being screened on BBC as there were with Audley?? if so then you my friend are firmly talking bollox. No one can argue that they wouldnt have also taken the money in Audleys position but at the same time he failed to deliver MASSIVELY during that contract and if i was in the BBC's shoes, i'd have gotten rid of boxing too. Just my opinion James wilson - i could be wrong as it did happen once before :TU:
I'm saying that if there was loads of interest in Haye and Froch's early fights, but hardly any interest in Audley's fights then the BBC would just have ditched Audley and kept on all their other boxing. But they didn't because viewing figures were poor across the board. I aint getting into the numbers but yes I am saying figures were low across the board. When the BBC got out of boxing Audley's previous 3 fights had been Hersisia, Francis and Bonin, around this time Haye had recently lost to Carl Thompson and was on his way back up after that knock, and I think (though I'm guessing here) Froch was fighting Damon Hague, Adamu and Mark Woolnough. Dunno if you can drag the figures up on those fights but I'll bet all of these would have had figures that flattered to decieve except maybe the Haye v Thompson fight as I think I remember that got shown on a delay on Grandstand. Also the million quid contract was for Audley's first 10 fights. After that I dunno what the contract was, but note they didn't ditch him at the end of the 10 fight deal, they ditched him when they ditched boxing altogether. Everyone seems to blame it on Audley, but I'm saying it was because nearly all the boxing they aired wasn't getting the required viewing figures.

Re: Strictly newsflash! Bookies strongly fancy Audley...

Posted: 08 Sep 2011, 08:26
by jameswilson
Ian if you can get hold of the figures for Audleys fight Vs hersisia, froch v adamu, Hague and woolnough, haye v Thompson and arturo gatti v leonard dorin could you post em up just for a comparison please. The discussion me and Cardiff lad are having isn't gonna get settled otherwise is it :D

Re: Strictly newsflash! Bookies strongly fancy Audley...

Posted: 08 Sep 2011, 17:22
by Bard of Boxrec
Holly Valance KO1 Audley Harrison.

Afterwards, they dance.