Strictly newsflash! Bookies strongly fancy Audley...
Posted: 07 Sep 2011, 10:44
MachoMan09 wrote:What, the opportunity to commit three/four months of their time to a reality television show? Any active sportsman with even a drop of ambition remaining wouldn't go near such a programme. I'm sure neither Cooper nor Bruno committed that much time to TV work, in a single stint, and perhaps in totality, during either their active or retired periods.tonyevs wrote:Its these type of opportunities that boxers are missing out on by not fighting on the BBC or ITV.
Bruno and Cooper made a large part of their money from such things ..
This is awful and as such i'm closing my ladbrokes account"Harrison may have had the fancy footwork in the ring but we can't see him landing the killer blow here.
I firmly believe your talking bollocks. If the BBC offered Audley that money then it's the BBC that are the mugs. Don't go making out you wouldn't say 'yeah happy with that' if they offered you a million. When they got out of boxing BBC were showing David Haye's fights live, Mick Hennesy's bigger bills and Audley's fights. If it was all on Audley then they would have just ditched him and kept the others on. It was low figures across the board, not just some of Audley's fights.Cardiff-Lad1 wrote:Seems fair enough to me.MachoMan09 wrote:The BBC are going to get their own back on that contract. They are a spiteful bunch of communist bastards, in my view, and seeing as how sending Audley to a gulag is beyond their mandate, they'll simply order Len Goodman, Alesha Dixon and those two mincers to verbally assassinate him in front of an audience of millions.![]()
I truely believe that Audley taking their 1 million quid with poor results is one of the main reasons that the BBC want nothing to do with boxing anymore.
I think a bet against him going first would be a decent bet, if he is the favourite to go first. Don't forget what Brits do in these voting systems, keep the shite ones in for comic effect. John Sergeant, Jedward, Rage against the machine xmas number 1 etc etc.black panther wrote:You can get 80-1 on Audley to win the thing if you're feeling the (A) Force. Though I believe the 2/1 for him to go first would be money better spent!
I got all the figures from the BBC for that time period. Audley started OK and then absolutely tanked.jameswilson wrote:I firmly believe your talking bollocks. If the BBC offered Audley that money then it's the BBC that are the mugs. Don't go making out you wouldn't say 'yeah happy with that' if they offered you a million. When they got out of boxing BBC were showing David Haye's fights live, Mick Hennesy's bigger bills and Audley's fights. If it was all on Audley then they would have just ditched him and kept the others on. It was low figures across the board, not just some of Audley's fights.Cardiff-Lad1 wrote:Seems fair enough to me.MachoMan09 wrote:The BBC are going to get their own back on that contract. They are a spiteful bunch of communist bastards, in my view, and seeing as how sending Audley to a gulag is beyond their mandate, they'll simply order Len Goodman, Alesha Dixon and those two mincers to verbally assassinate him in front of an audience of millions.![]()
I truely believe that Audley taking their 1 million quid with poor results is one of the main reasons that the BBC want nothing to do with boxing anymore.
I'm saying that if there was loads of interest in Haye and Froch's early fights, but hardly any interest in Audley's fights then the BBC would just have ditched Audley and kept on all their other boxing. But they didn't because viewing figures were poor across the board. I aint getting into the numbers but yes I am saying figures were low across the board. When the BBC got out of boxing Audley's previous 3 fights had been Hersisia, Francis and Bonin, around this time Haye had recently lost to Carl Thompson and was on his way back up after that knock, and I think (though I'm guessing here) Froch was fighting Damon Hague, Adamu and Mark Woolnough. Dunno if you can drag the figures up on those fights but I'll bet all of these would have had figures that flattered to decieve except maybe the Haye v Thompson fight as I think I remember that got shown on a delay on Grandstand. Also the million quid contract was for Audley's first 10 fights. After that I dunno what the contract was, but note they didn't ditch him at the end of the 10 fight deal, they ditched him when they ditched boxing altogether. Everyone seems to blame it on Audley, but I'm saying it was because nearly all the boxing they aired wasn't getting the required viewing figures.Cardiff-Lad1 wrote: I guess thats my point exactly - With each fight the figures got worse (ish) and by the end i guess the BBC wanted no more to do with it. Jameswilson - Are you honestly saying that there was as little interest in the other fights being screened on BBC as there were with Audley?? if so then you my friend are firmly talking bollox. No one can argue that they wouldnt have also taken the money in Audleys position but at the same time he failed to deliver MASSIVELY during that contract and if i was in the BBC's shoes, i'd have gotten rid of boxing too. Just my opinion James wilson - i could be wrong as it did happen once before