Page 1 of 1

Jamie Cox wins the Commonwealth title! Low blows?

Posted: 09 Sep 2011, 18:16
by plymouthskinhead
I'm disgusted that Jamie Cox won the title tonight and despite having 2 points deducted he still manage a score of 119-113. OK, I know a judge has the disgression to agree or disagree with a referee's point deduction, but Stevie Wonder would have seen the low blows and there were plenty of them.

I call blatant robbery there, he was getting away with murder, the ref had a shocker IMHO... :oo :shame:

Re: Jamie Cox wins the Commonwealth title! Low blows?

Posted: 09 Sep 2011, 18:19
by damianhucker1
plymouthskinhead wrote:I'm disgusted that Jamie Cox won the title tonight and despite having 2 points deducted he still manage a score of 119-113. OK, I know a judge has the disgression to agree or disagree with a referee's point deduction, but Stevie Wonder would have seen the low blows and there were plenty of them.

I call blatant robbery there, he was getting away with murder, the ref had a shocker IMHO... :oo :shame:
as did the judges

Re: Jamie Cox wins the Commonwealth title! Low blows?

Posted: 09 Sep 2011, 18:21
by plymouthskinhead
damianhucker1 wrote:
plymouthskinhead wrote:I'm disgusted that Jamie Cox won the title tonight and despite having 2 points deducted he still manage a score of 119-113. OK, I know a judge has the disgression to agree or disagree with a referee's point deduction, but Stevie Wonder would have seen the low blows and there were plenty of them.

I call blatant robbery there, he was getting away with murder, the ref had a shocker IMHO... :oo :shame:
as did the judges
Correct, them too. :shame: