BoxRec

A 15-rounder at Heavy. Thoughts for this one?

I think Baer may wind up knocking Moore out.

Archie also might be just a bit too cerebral for Max. Braddock certainly was.

Archie might even hire a few girls to sit up in the front rows, and I'm afraid Max just might not be able to hold his focus as the Mongoose sets the trap.

Easy. Moore was a middleweight when Maxie was fighting. Max would have had too much experience, and about 60 pounds on young Archie.

raylawpc wrote:Easy. Moore was a middleweight when Maxie was fighting. Max would have had too much experience, and about 60 pounds on young Archie.

No. I mean when they were in their HW primes.

Just for Irene

From your collection, Darling?

I believe I've seen that pic before.....a genuine granberry collectors piece as I recall.

Giancarlo wrote:Just for Irene

Is that Kid Azteca Giancarlo?

Goodnight, Irene wrote:

raylawpc wrote:Easy. Moore was a middleweight when Maxie was fighting. Max would have had too much experience, and about 60 pounds on young Archie.

No. I mean when they were in their HW primes.

When was Moore's prime?

Id say he earned that shot at Marciano with a pretty damn impressive run. What do you think of the fight, Ray?

Jaywheel wrote:

Giancarlo wrote:Just for Irene

Is that Kid Azteca Giancarlo?

Because you lack even rudimentaary punctuation skills, your comment is meaningless.

Is english your first language, Jay?

Goodnight, Irene wrote:Id say he earned that shot at Marciano with a pretty damn impressive run. What do you think of the fight, Ray?

Yeah, he earned his shot . . . but was that his prime?

I don't think much about it. Can't say that I've ever considered a prime Baer v. a prime Moore match-up.

Giancarlo wrote:

Jaywheel wrote:

Giancarlo wrote:Just for Irene

Is that Kid Azteca Giancarlo?

Because you lack even rudimentaary punctuation skills, your comment is meaningless.

Is english your first language, Jay?

It is not. So instead of concentrating on punctuation, I spent time learning to spell rudimentary words like rudimentary, which you obviously did not. Therefore, that would make your comment meaningless, or is it meaaningless? :P

Collins, you fvcktard. We love you D

Jaywheel wrote:

Giancarlo wrote:

Jaywheel wrote: Is that Kid Azteca Giancarlo?

Because you lack even rudimentaary punctuation skills, your comment is meaningless.

Is english your first language, Jay?

It is not. So instead of concentrating on punctuation, I spent time learning to spell rudimentary words like rudimentary, which you obviously did not. Therefore, that would make your comment meaningless, or is it meaaningless? :P

Now that's funny!

MIMO TWO AWL:

Im sawry but punkchewashun ALWEYS madders....ass duz speling. Yoo cant git bi on just tha meening behind yur chosun eggspresshun. Tha spiret behind yur staatments is never ass importunt az the fawnt yoo chews and yer presuntashun.

cinceerlee

yer frendlee BAWKSWRECK mawdirateher

BAWKSBUZ

BoxBuzz wrote:MIMO TWO AWL:

Im sawry but punkchewashun ALWEYS madders....ass duz speling. Yoo cant git bi on just tha meening behind yur chosun eggspresshun. Tha spiret behind yur staatments is never ass importunt as the fawnt yoo chews and yer presuntashun.

cinceerlee

yer frendlee BAWKSWRECK mawdirateher

BAWKSBUZ

Not as funny . . .

Slapstick vs HighBrow

Three Stooges vs Marx Bros


It's an endless debate.....

However both Max Baer and Max Rosenbloom would have preferred the less subtle approach.

Giancarlo wrote:Just for Irene

Is it just me, or did Baer have a really big noggin?

Goodnight, Irene wrote:

Collins, you fvcktard. We love you D

When you say "we" Irene, are you just referring to you and that other fvcktard Jay? Or is it a troika that includes the dullard Yancey.

Either way, which one of you is the wheelbarrow?

raylawpc wrote:

Giancarlo wrote:Just for Irene

Is it just me, or did Baer have a really big noggin?

That would be a question that Irene would be most keen to know the answer to.

Provided, of course, that a noggin is a male appendage.

raylawpc wrote:

Jaywheel wrote:

Giancarlo wrote: Because you lack even rudimentaary punctuation skills, your comment is meaningless.

Is english your first language, Jay?

It is not. So instead of concentrating on punctuation, I spent time learning to spell rudimentary words like rudimentary, which you obviously did not. Therefore, that would make your comment meaningless, or is it meaaningless? :P

Now that's funny!

You'll keep, Tommy.

BoxBuzz wrote:MIMO TWO AWL:

Im sawry but punkchewashun ALWEYS madders....ass duz speling. Yoo cant git bi on just tha meening behind yur chosun eggspresshun. Tha spiret behind yur staatments is never ass importunt az the fawnt yoo chews and yer presuntashun.

cinceerlee

yer frendlee BAWKSWRECK mawdirateher

BAWKSBUZ

Next!

Giancarlo wrote:

raylawpc wrote:

Jaywheel wrote: It is not. So instead of concentrating on punctuation, I spent time learning to spell rudimentary words like rudimentary, which you obviously did not. Therefore, that would make your comment meaningless, or is it meaaningless? :P

Now that's funny!

You'll keep, Tommy.

You wont...you know, if I get you banned again, & you have to return under another alias

Anyone notice, BTW, Collins has kind of devolved into a creature reminiscent of the man he hates most --- Granberry? Nothing to add of worth, just randomised appearances to insult other members (or make a fool of himself trying, at least) & amuse himself?

LOL.

I believe there is a place in the forum for those who have unique styles of expression, those who are inconsistent, and those who's tempers fluctuate wildly....and in granberry's case those who miss their meds on occasion.

We should recognized that thiis a boxing forum, and thus a wide berth of conflict and engagement styles should be assumed and allowable if not embraced. One might assume a different set of communication skillsets on a chess forum. If that's your cup of tea, please find that chess forum and enjoy!

I recall on one occasion attempting to draw the contrast between the participants on this forum..and say a bunch of old ladies on a knitting forum.....for some of you it may seem as if the similarites are perhaps even more striking. It all depends on how you're wired I suppose.