Martin Murray vs Felix Sturm
Posted: 19 Sep 2011, 05:26
Ive just seen on twitter that Martin Murray is to be given a title shot at Felix Sturm , tough fight for Murray but i do like him ,can he cause an upset ?
I think the fact that Macklin has signed with DiBella means he will be launching himself in the States in the next few months. Sturm won't travel to the USA for a rematch.yid14 wrote:Can't believe Macklin hasn't got a re-match. Martin Murray will need a Knock-out.
I read somewhere that Macklin turned down the terms ofthe re-match as they were the same as the 1st fight and Macklin wanted better terms. Might have been all crap though.yid14 wrote:strange though isn't it you'd think that Macklin would just be pushing for a re-match and surely he would be made mandatory challenger on his last performance, so now he's gonna go to pastures new and settle for a defeat on his record.
The only chance Macklin had was to knock Sturm out. Shame nobody told him that at the start.Josh1111 wrote:I read somewhere that Macklin turned down the terms ofthe re-match as they were the same as the 1st fight and Macklin wanted better terms. Might have been all crap though.yid14 wrote:strange though isn't it you'd think that Macklin would just be pushing for a re-match and surely he would be made mandatory challenger on his last performance, so now he's gonna go to pastures new and settle for a defeat on his record.
Come on Murray, top fighter, hope this isn't too soon for the lad. I honestl think he has as much chance as Macklin did.
Time will tell, bg step up for Murray. I think if Murray and Macklin got in the ring together, Murray would win but again, just my opinionyid14 wrote:The only chance Macklin had was to knock Sturm out. Shame nobody told him that at the start.Josh1111 wrote:I read somewhere that Macklin turned down the terms ofthe re-match as they were the same as the 1st fight and Macklin wanted better terms. Might have been all crap though.yid14 wrote:strange though isn't it you'd think that Macklin would just be pushing for a re-match and surely he would be made mandatory challenger on his last performance, so now he's gonna go to pastures new and settle for a defeat on his record.
Come on Murray, top fighter, hope this isn't too soon for the lad. I honestl think he has as much chance as Macklin did.
I think Sturms too good for Murray anyway, so it won't come down to Sturms relatives scoring.
Im with you,id back Murray over Macklin...But Murray needs a decent hard test before facing Sturm,how can you get a World title shot on the back of beating a novice in Blackwell?? i know Murray has got the WBA inter whatever title but come on...Josh1111 wrote:Time will tell, bg step up for Murray. I think if Murray and Macklin got in the ring together, Murray would win but again, just my opinionyid14 wrote:The only chance Macklin had was to knock Sturm out. Shame nobody told him that at the start.Josh1111 wrote: I read somewhere that Macklin turned down the terms ofthe re-match as they were the same as the 1st fight and Macklin wanted better terms. Might have been all crap though.
Come on Murray, top fighter, hope this isn't too soon for the lad. I honestl think he has as much chance as Macklin did.
I think Sturms too good for Murray anyway, so it won't come down to Sturms relatives scoring.
Boxing has changed Tommy, not many fighters who get a shot these days deserve it and the ones who aren't ready usually get found out. Lets hope Murray is one of the few that is ready and can cause an upsetTommy Gunn13 wrote:Im with you,id back Murray over Macklin...But Murray needs a decent hard test before facing Sturm,how can you get a World title shot on the back of beating a novice in Blackwell?? i know Murray has got the WBA inter whatever title but come on...Josh1111 wrote:Time will tell, bg step up for Murray. I think if Murray and Macklin got in the ring together, Murray would win but again, just my opinionyid14 wrote: The only chance Macklin had was to knock Sturm out. Shame nobody told him that at the start.
I think Sturms too good for Murray anyway, so it won't come down to Sturms relatives scoring.
There are so many world titles that a 'World Title' is not a World Title anymore.Tommy Gunn13 wrote:I wish Murray all the best&im behind him 100% in this fight!! but how can you get a WORLD TITLE shot when you havnt beaten anyone of note&that includes your own country????? SHOCKING!!!!
Spot on. I was looking at his record and it's nothing compared to Sturm's. Man against boy, I'm afraid...Tommy Gunn13 wrote:I wish Murray all the best&im behind him 100% in this fight!! but how can you get a WORLD TITLE shot when you havnt beaten anyone of note&that includes your own country????? SHOCKING!!!!
Its not as if hes fighting for a Vacant or interim title against a nobody,hes fighting a decent champion in Sturm...boxbet wrote:There are so many world titles that a 'World Title' is not a World Title anymore.Tommy Gunn13 wrote:I wish Murray all the best&im behind him 100% in this fight!! but how can you get a WORLD TITLE shot when you havnt beaten anyone of note&that includes your own country????? SHOCKING!!!!
Tony Bellews got a world title shot so why not Martin,sturms probably lookin for a fight to look good in as he was not at his best last time out isnt that the whole point of a volunatry defence, who cares lets jus get behind martin and support one of our own, he's british and a top lad, n trains like a machine, hes not some bum with a losing record who doesnt respect the sport.boxbet wrote:There are so many world titles that a 'World Title' is not a World Title anymore.Tommy Gunn13 wrote:I wish Murray all the best&im behind him 100% in this fight!! but how can you get a WORLD TITLE shot when you havnt beaten anyone of note&that includes your own country????? SHOCKING!!!!