BoxRec

http://www.heavyweightblog.com/

I read a few of the articles today. Although I disagree with some of the things the person writes (claiming the Klits as the best HW boxers ever), he makes some decent points.

Here are a few notable articles:

http://www.heavyweightblog.com/126/heav ... t-division

http://www.heavyweightblog.com/1609/whi ... s-the-best

TarkanX wrote:http://www.heavyweightblog.com/

I read a few of the articles today. Although I disagree with some of the things the person writes (claiming the Klits as the best HW boxers ever), he makes some decent points.

Here are a few notable articles:

http://www.heavyweightblog.com/126/heav ... t-division

http://www.heavyweightblog.com/1609/whi ... s-the-best

That's ten minutes of my life I won't get back . . . no decent points I could find.

lost time....I hate when that happens.

No, this makes zero decent points. Complete waste of bandwith.

I should have made myself a little more clearer. While I don't think the Klits should be all time greats, I think they are underrated, and would give some of the best boxers problems, due to their size (Patterson, Norton, for example). Some of the data that he put in, I very much disagree with, especially the ones that discard boxers just because they are under 200 pounds.

Darn, lost about 15 seconds that time!