Page 1 of 5
allegedly 456 - thoughts ?
Posted: 30 Sep 2011, 15:42
by whiskey
Pros - enthusiasm, good array of guests with Degale, Burns. Buncey and the rest doing well.
Cons - Broadcast quality. Really misty picture for me, sometime bright, sometimes too dark. Sound EQ - one minute loud, next inaudible. When the tall fella starts interviewing it's like i've got water in my ears from going swimming !
Technical aside, the content is pretty smooth and I'm enjoying the show.
Re: allegedly 456 - thoughts ?
Posted: 30 Sep 2011, 15:43
by Craig14
G0mez wrote:Pros - enthusiasm, good array of guests with Degale, Burns. Buncey and the rest doing well.
Cons - Broadcast quality. Really misty picture for me, sometime bright, sometimes too dark. Sound EQ - one minute loud, next inaudible. When the tall fella starts interviewing it's like i've got water in my ears from going swimming !
Technical aside, the content is pretty smooth and I'm enjoying the show.
me too I'm enjoying it aswell - Good move having it at the york Hall
Re: allegedly 456 - thoughts ?
Posted: 30 Sep 2011, 15:45
by Craig14
Who is the the wanna-be Jonny Nelson interviewer?
Re: allegedly 456 - thoughts ?
Posted: 30 Sep 2011, 15:48
by stujones
Keeps cutting out, some teething problems for sure. It doesn't feel settled.
Re: allegedly 456 - thoughts ?
Posted: 30 Sep 2011, 15:52
by alexpaterson
What a cracking fight!! Razak going for it
Re: allegedly 456 - thoughts ?
Posted: 30 Sep 2011, 15:54
by Craig14
alexpaterson wrote:What a cracking fight!! Razak going for it
How do you score that round?
Re: allegedly 456 - thoughts ?
Posted: 30 Sep 2011, 15:55
by slapbangwhallop
yid14 wrote:Who is the the wanna-be Jonny Nelson interviewer?
cant remember his name but he has been doing BBC Boxing (commonwealth, Olympics, amateur) stuff for years.
Freakishly tall.
Re: allegedly 456 - thoughts ?
Posted: 30 Sep 2011, 15:56
by whiskey
alexpaterson wrote:What a cracking fight!! Razak going for it
Great fight. I thought Razak stepped off a bit, worried he'd blow any future bookings !
Re: allegedly 456 - thoughts ?
Posted: 30 Sep 2011, 15:57
by slapbangwhallop
Its been brilliant so far.
Iffy lighting and momentary outages havent taken the gloss off it whatsoever for me.
Re: allegedly 456 - thoughts ?
Posted: 30 Sep 2011, 16:03
by alexpaterson
G0mez wrote:alexpaterson wrote:What a cracking fight!! Razak going for it
Great fight. I thought Razak stepped off a bit, worried he'd blow any future bookings !
That's what I was thinking, Schwincon (?spelling) looked there for the taking, boxing better now
Re: allegedly 456 - thoughts ?
Posted: 30 Sep 2011, 16:15
by Grays_Dan
One thing I am loving is, we havent got the "break to adverts" that Sky dish up in between rounds. I honestly thought Shinkwin was done for there.
Re: allegedly 456 - thoughts ?
Posted: 30 Sep 2011, 16:20
by alexpaterson
Impressed with the channel so far, Maccerenelli is a superb commentator!!
Re: allegedly 456 - thoughts ?
Posted: 30 Sep 2011, 16:22
by ThereByTheGrace
slapbangwhallop wrote:yid14 wrote:Who is the the wanna-be Jonny Nelson interviewer?
cant remember his name but he has been doing BBC Boxing (commonwealth, Olympics, amateur) stuff for years.
Freakishly tall.
Ronald McIntosh
Re: allegedly 456 - thoughts ?
Posted: 30 Sep 2011, 16:25
by -KOKid-
Enjoying the show, the TV production needs to improve.
- More cameras, more angles.
- Better camera work - either keep interviewer on screen or off screen.
The chin and nose in the top left corner looks really amateurish.
- More/better lighting.
- Sound adjustment.
Some parts very loud, others too low.
And please give Rawling and Maccarinnelli some headset mics.
Smooth out broadcast.
Screen goes black every once in a while.
Thankfully, all of the above are easy enough to do something about.
The actual show is good enough for me.
Crowd seems to be loving it as well.
Re: allegedly 456 - thoughts ?
Posted: 30 Sep 2011, 16:26
by Baboon
alexpaterson wrote:Impressed with the channel so far, Maccerenelli is a superb commentator!!
Agree, Enzo's sounding good. Positive, good delivery and picking up some interesting technical points. After years of listening to poor old Duke stumbling about and Watt (who I rate) whining like hell, it's a refreshing change.
Would be a lot happier if he made it a full time career rather than fighting.
Re: allegedly 456 - thoughts ?
Posted: 30 Sep 2011, 16:28
by Baboon
ThereByTheGrace wrote:slapbangwhallop wrote:yid14 wrote:Who is the the wanna-be Jonny Nelson interviewer?
cant remember his name but he has been doing BBC Boxing (commonwealth, Olympics, amateur) stuff for years.
Freakishly tall.
Ronald McIntosh
I like Ronald, remember him getting a bit of stick on here but he comes across as a top gent.
Glad I'm watching this on a 26" screen, definition looks pish, must be hell on a big screen....
Re: allegedly 456 - thoughts ?
Posted: 30 Sep 2011, 16:37
by broomy7s
Good to see plenty of the undercard. Get the black screen now and again but it doesn't last for long. Can't complain for their 1st show tho, will only get better. Decent amount of interviews and looks like they'll get a lot of pundits from warren's stable.
Re: allegedly 456 - thoughts ?
Posted: 30 Sep 2011, 16:39
by TheCobra
ANyone got a decent stream for this? PM me. :-)
Re: allegedly 456 - thoughts ?
Posted: 30 Sep 2011, 16:40
by housesecond
Surprisingly competitive fights considering the match ups???
Re: allegedly 456 - thoughts ?
Posted: 30 Sep 2011, 16:42
by stujones
broomy7s wrote:Good to see plenty of the undercard. Get the black screen now and again but it doesn't last for long. Can't complain for their 1st show tho, will only get better. Decent amount of interviews and looks like they'll get a lot of pundits from warren's stable.
Its the first night, but it has more of a chat show feel than I would like.... especially at the start - it was Degale who got to plug his fight, then Burns who plugged his fight..... I'm sure when the channel is more established it will be less like that.
I hope Richard Keys is only there for the opening night, he aint bad just Dempsey and Rosenthal are so much better talking boxing.
Nice to see Mike Goodhall doing the MC ing..... its been too long since he has been on TV.
Re: allegedly 456 - thoughts ?
Posted: 30 Sep 2011, 16:43
by ThereByTheGrace
This isnt bad - good to see boxing get a platform on its own channel to showcase some fighters - here's hoping it continues!
Even Sky lost money for years before they struck it rich - hope in 20 years (or less) we have boxing back where it belongs!

Re: allegedly 456 - thoughts ?
Posted: 30 Sep 2011, 16:44
by pyenest77
Hey at the end of the day its free. Early days & a few teething problems, but first couple of fights there has been plenty action. The only way is up I am sure they will learn from their mistakes.
Re: allegedly 456 - thoughts ?
Posted: 30 Sep 2011, 16:44
by JC
Anyone else becoming aware of a desire to buy some Reebok trainers, join The Army and then punch and inflatable man in the chest while drinking Smirnoff?
Re: allegedly 456 - thoughts ?
Posted: 30 Sep 2011, 16:48
by Jackjackson
J-C wrote:Anyone else becoming aware of a desire to buy some Reebok trainers, join The Army and then punch and inflatable man in the chest while drinking Smirnoff?
Lol
Re: allegedly 456 - thoughts ?
Posted: 30 Sep 2011, 16:49
by Jackjackson
It's going to be a good channel once the little probs are ironed out it will only get better