Page 1 of 4
Re: Buncey's Back!
Posted: 09 Oct 2011, 12:59
by Finch
Will Bunce be given a free reign ala Setanta to his express his views, or will he be fed lines from Frank?
Once the show gets going after a few weeks, will it feature non-Frank boxers?
Great to see Buncey back!
Re: Buncey's Back!
Posted: 09 Oct 2011, 13:09
by gasman
This is great, it was brilliant in the days of Setanta, very entertaining, informative and a bit of craziness in there too. One of the smartest moves allegedly did was to restore the Bunce Boxing Hour
Re: Buncey's Back!
Posted: 09 Oct 2011, 13:52
by Buncey
I reached out for a big Sky fighter but was told: No way!
I will mention ALL fighters and fights. Don't expect me to give out Primetime's subscription details!
Adios and thanks.
Re: Buncey's Back!
Posted: 09 Oct 2011, 13:56
by Tommy Gunn13
Is this avalible online??
Re: Buncey's Back!
Posted: 09 Oct 2011, 14:32
by Tomasino
allegedly wrote:Hi all,
Steve Bunce's hugely popular Boxing Hour makes it long awaited return to UK television screens' tomorrow night (Monday 17th October) at 8pm, LIVE and exclusive on allegedly (Sky Platform Ch. 456).
The boxing fans' favourite show returns with a mix of guests, interviews, news, exclusives, highlights and of course plenty of controversy on the UK's first and only dedicated fight channel.
Planned for Buncey's first show back are: super-heavyweight sensation Anthony Joshua who won silver at the World Amateur Championships; Britain's only ever World Amateur Champion Frankie Gavin to cast his verdict on the record medal haul by Team GB in Azerbaijan; East End favourite Johnny Greaves and bitter rivals Nathan Cleverly and Tony Bellew join in on the phone ahead of their big fight on Saturday night in Liverpool.
Make sure you tune in to allegedly tomorrow night from 8pm for Bunce's Boxing Hour.
Please just make sure this program is about boxing and not Bunce. Please!
Re: Buncey's Back!
Posted: 09 Oct 2011, 14:46
by Buncey
Davey,
I will do my best, but you know what he is like.
Adios.
Re: Buncey's Back!
Posted: 09 Oct 2011, 15:28
by Jon Saxon
I'm glad to see it back!
They must have saw my post!!
Re: Buncey's Back!
Posted: 09 Oct 2011, 15:51
by Twinkle Toes
Can't see this being anything more than an advert for allegedly and its fighters.
Re: Buncey's Back!
Posted: 09 Oct 2011, 16:03
by JC
allegedly wrote:Hi all,Steve Bunce's hugely popular Boxing Hour makes it long awaited return to UK television screens' tomorrow night (Monday 17th October) at 8pm, LIVE and exclusive on allegedly (Sky Platform Ch. 456).
Confused
Re: Buncey's Back!
Posted: 09 Oct 2011, 16:46
by whiskey
Re: Buncey's Back!
Posted: 09 Oct 2011, 16:50
by Tomasino
Buncey wrote:Davey,
I will do my best, but you know what he is like.
Adios.
Aye he is mental!
Re: Buncey's Back!
Posted: 09 Oct 2011, 17:06
by Giancarlo
DaveBoyMorrison wrote:Buncey wrote:Davey,
I will do my best, but you know what he is like.
Adios.
Aye he is mental!
I suspect he is well paid to act that part.
I wonder if the gurning is natural or just done for dramatic effect.
Ah, good old Big Daddy Bunce; he's great for a laugh.
Re: Buncey's Back!
Posted: 09 Oct 2011, 18:10
by Tomasino
Giancarlo wrote:DaveBoyMorrison wrote:Buncey wrote:Davey,
I will do my best, but you know what he is like.
Adios.
Aye he is mental!
I suspect he is well paid to act that part.
I wonder if the gurning is natural or just done for dramatic effect.
Ah, good old Big Daddy Bunce; he's great for a laugh.
I think the gurning is caused by jellied eels. I had to stop watching when he was on Setanta as he kept calling grown men "boy" and sparring with non existent opponents.
Re: Buncey's Back!
Posted: 09 Oct 2011, 19:06
by MightyWarrior
BIGMARK wrote:Buncey wrote:I reached out for a big Sky fighter but was told: No way!
I will mention ALL fighters and fights. Don't expect me to give out Primetime's subscription details!
Adios and thanks.
Wow, that is a bit petty from Sky and also a little surprising seeing that Frank still has an existing contract with them. I said on another thread I wouldnt be surprised if Sky were behind allegedly in a silent partner type way. I say this as I was surprised they had Bellew in the studio on the recent bill from Liverpool when they surely knew his fight with Cleverley wasn't going to be on their channel.
Are you sure it wasn't FW who said No Way ?
Re: Buncey's Back!
Posted: 10 Oct 2011, 03:10
by JC
allegedly wrote:Sorry, getting ahead of the schedules! It should be Monday 10th October.
J-C wrote:allegedly wrote:Hi all,Steve Bunce's hugely popular Boxing Hour makes it long awaited return to UK television screens' tomorrow night (Monday 17th October) at 8pm, LIVE and exclusive on allegedly (Sky Platform Ch. 456).
Confused
Nice one, looking forward to it
Re: Buncey's Back!
Posted: 10 Oct 2011, 03:54
by Glyn Leach
Buncey wrote:I reached out for a big Sky fighter but was told: No way!
Adios and thanks.
No no no, that helps no one. All the Promoters and TV boss bang on about trying to build boxing but then we get this, the same old degeneration into factions and alliances. Really disappointing. In truth I'm not surprised by this pettiness, but I am disappointed.
Re: Buncey's Back!
Posted: 10 Oct 2011, 03:59
by stujones
Told no way by who Steve? allegedly? Sky? The fighters manager? The fighter himself? Its a little bit cryptic there.
Re: Buncey's Back!
Posted: 10 Oct 2011, 04:37
by Buncey
It's not a allegedly problem, let's leave it at that.
My policy on this show will be to have fighters from all promoters and TV networks. That's a fact.
Adios.
Re: Buncey's Back!
Posted: 10 Oct 2011, 04:51
by dondada
BIGMARK wrote:Buncey wrote:I reached out for a big Sky fighter but was told: No way!
I will mention ALL fighters and fights. Don't expect me to give out Primetime's subscription details!
Adios and thanks.
Wow, that is a bit petty from Sky and also a little surprising seeing that Frank still has an existing contract with them.
You're kidding me, right Mark?
Man with contract at one TV channel helps set up another and you want the first one to HELP him?
Re: Buncey's Back!
Posted: 10 Oct 2011, 06:50
by DavidPayne
A maths question for you what is four fifths of fornicate all?
For those who wanted more competition in the coverage of the sport.
Be careful what you wish for.
Re: Buncey's Back!
Posted: 10 Oct 2011, 06:59
by JamesH
DavidPayne wrote:A maths question for you what is four fifths of eff all?
For those who wanted more competition in the coverage of the sport.
Be careful what you wish for.
I totally agree.
As I've mentioned on here before, more competition in the football Premiership market made it nearly twice as expensive to watch the Premiership.
Re: Buncey's Back!
Posted: 10 Oct 2011, 07:25
by Glyn Leach
DavidPayne wrote:A maths question for you what is four fifths of eff all?
For those who wanted more competition in the coverage of the sport.
Be careful what you wish for.
Competition is healthy as long as the competitors aren't so childish as to factionalise and politicise it. It should be used as a spur to raise their own game rather than damage the larger whole and end of with the four fifths of fornicate all scenario. Schoolboy behaviour. Don't worry about the opposition, be confident in yourself - and if you can't be, ask yourself why and then try to put it right.
Re: Buncey's Back!
Posted: 10 Oct 2011, 07:26
by Scottrf
Glyn Leach wrote:DavidPayne wrote:A maths question for you what is four fifths of eff all?
For those who wanted more competition in the coverage of the sport.
Be careful what you wish for.
Competition is healthy as long as the competitors aren't so childish as to factionalise and politicise it. It should be used as a spur to raise their own game rather than damage the larger whole and end of with the four fifths of eff all scenario. Schoolboy behaviour. Don't worry about the opposition, be confident in yourself - and if you can't be, ask yourself why and then try to put it right.
A monopoly is good if it means you get to see all the fights on one channel rather than bidding wars and fights being split between 3/4 channels that you have to pay for separately though.
Re: Buncey's Back!
Posted: 10 Oct 2011, 07:29
by MightyWarrior
Scottrf wrote:A monopoly is good if it means you get to see all the fights on one channel rather than bidding wars and fights being split between 3/4 channels that you have to pay for separately though.
Not neccesarily. When Sky were the only game in town, they could completely ignore a big Roy Jones fight, and pretend he didn't even exist. And decide not to show a fight as big as Trinidad/Hopkins, leaving us the viewers with no alternative channel to watch it on.
At least now Primetime et al are picking up the slack.
And FW and Sky are as bad as each other when it comes to a childish and spiteful attitude towards the competition.
Re: Buncey's Back!
Posted: 10 Oct 2011, 07:32
by Scottrf
MightyWarrior wrote:Scottrf wrote:A monopoly is good if it means you get to see all the fights on one channel rather than bidding wars and fights being split between 3/4 channels that you have to pay for separately though.
Not neccesarily. When Sky were the only game in town, they could completely ignore a big Roy Jones fight, and pretend he didn't even exist. And decide not to show a fight as big as Trinidad/Hopkins, leaving us the viewers with no alternative channel to watch it on.
At least now Primetime et al are picking up the slack.
And FW and Sky are as bad as each other when it comes to the competition.
Those examples are from a decade ago. At the start of this year they were looking like picking up every domestic fight and a good number of foreign ones. Now you have to subcribe to Box ntion and pay for a Primetime fight every couple of months to watch a similar number of fights. I don't think either have yet showed a fight Sky wouldn't have otherwise.
