BoxRec

first off congratulations to cleverly on retaining his title.

but a few things i would like to say.

1 i did get my prediction wrong as i said bellew k.o, but lets not forget your prediction a cleverly k.o in the middle rounds.
also that clevery is a far better boxer, and so on and so on, i cant be bothered copying and pasting all your posts but am sure youl admit you were wrong too,

lets go over some facts, bellew is and was a better boxer than cleverly and jabbed his head off all night, cleverly won that fight on his engine and that alone.

if cleverly didnt have the title bellew would have won that fight no doubt what so ever, i as many people had bellew at least a round up, if they were fighting for no title then bellew would have won the fight, obviously they wasnt but as the saying goes you must take the belt away from the champion, there were a few close rounds were it was a 50/50 round and clev got it only because he is the champion.

they both fought really well and credit to both boxes they gave there all,

if bellew would have had as many fights as clev and had some experience with world class opposition he would have won hands down but that little in experience made the difference,

i honestly thought bellew won that fight he landed the bigger shots and was the better boxer of the 2, but well done cleverly i wish him the best in the future,

i cant wait for a for more fights down the line coz am sure there will be a rematch, and maybe then we can both make another prediction and see whose right.

You should of replied Football Nowhere near enough, Rugby 'ooh' just not quite enough and finally Cleverly just by the skin of his teeth enough.

Right hook, I admire your loyalty buddy but Tony DID NOT win that fight. He proved a lot of people wrong myself included by the way he fought but again he DID NOT win that fight mate by at least 2 rounds.

Best he moves up to CW and get his own world title and then maybe Nathan can move up and challenge HIM

Lads there is no point in trying to get a reasoned discussion out of righthook as far as Bellew is concerned.

He is a good mate of Tony's and so biased. Even Bellew himself disagrees with righthooks scoring of the fight and says that he had it a draw.

righthook was also banging on and on and on about frankie KOing curtis if you recall. he knows frankie as well. you have to take him with a pinch of salt lads

righthook wrote:first off congratulations to cleverly on retaining his title.

but a few things i would like to say.

1 i did get my prediction wrong as i said bellew k.o, but lets not forget your prediction a cleverly k.o in the middle rounds.
also that clevery is a far better boxer, and so on and so on, i cant be bothered copying and pasting all your posts but am sure youl admit you were wrong too,

lets go over some facts, bellew is and was a better boxer than cleverly and jabbed his head off all night, cleverly won that fight on his engine and that alone.

if cleverly didnt have the title bellew would have won that fight no doubt what so ever, i as many people had bellew at least a round up, if they were fighting for no title then bellew would have won the fight, obviously they wasnt but as the saying goes you must take the belt away from the champion, there were a few close rounds were it was a 50/50 round and clev got it only because he is the champion.

they both fought really well and credit to both boxes they gave there all,

if bellew would have had as many fights as clev and had some experience with world class opposition he would have won hands down but that little in experience made the difference,

i honestly thought bellew won that fight he landed the bigger shots and was the better boxer of the 2, but well done cleverly i wish him the best in the future,

i cant wait for a for more fights down the line coz am sure there will be a rematch, and maybe then we can both make another prediction and see whose right.

Some good points made but Tony didn't win the fight.

The fight came too early for Tony that's all.

yid14 wrote:You should of replied Football Nowhere near enough, Rugby 'ooh' just not quite enough and finally Cleverly just by the skin of his teeth enough.

Ha ha

allahsnackbar wrote:righthook was also banging on and on and on about frankie KOing curtis if you recall. he knows frankie as well. you have to take him with a pinch of salt lads

To be fair, a lot of people thought Frankie would destroy Curtis.

I thought frankie v woodhouse would be a mismatch and alot of people had bellew up by a round I did, so although righthook might be abit biast at times he does make some valid points

diggler wrote:I thought frankie v woodhouse would be a mismatch and alot of people had bellew up by a round I did, so although righthook might be abit biast at times he does make some valid points

iv always liked you diggler

on a serious note i thought frankie would out class woodhouse with ease, but i come the next day and said i was wrong and woodhouse is a warrior of the sport and a great fighter.

on the bellew situation i honestly at the fight thought bellew had it by 2 rounds, but when i watched it on tv i changed my mind to 1 round up, but even if you call it a draw the judging was way off, i give credit to cleverly he fought like a true champion, but imo he got out jabbed out punched and bellew out mussled him, he come on strong in the last 2 rounds and thats where his great engine come into play, but like i said earlier on if that fight was for no title i honestly think bellew would have won. coz on the close rounds the judges must have thought well cleverlys the champ so il just give the close rounds his way
great fight, and i take nothing away from cleverly but they have to get it on again in the future i dont think im the only 1 who thinks it was a very close fight that deserves a rematch

No there are a few on here that are also delusional Tony clearly lost that fight mate. But again your dedication to Tony is admireable

taf is eddie hearn, jane couch and kevin mitchel delusional because they all had bellew winning so maybe it wasn't that clear a win

King Geedorah wrote:Fair enough bumping a thread if you get a prediction right but creating a new one to point out that someone got it wrong, we'd be ten pages deep every monday if everyone did this

Haye would still spank Wlad, providing he gets his toe in order. Believe!

diggler wrote:taf is eddie hearn, jane couch and kevin mitchel delusional because they all had bellew winning so maybe it wasn't that clear a win

Some of the above are clear Bellew fans who will watch the fight back IMHO and realise he lost.

I've watched it back 3 times and I'm a honest person! I didn't Lise that fight and Parris is a disgrace!

Bomber 1 wrote:I've watched it back 3 times and I'm a honest person! I didn't Lise that fight and Parris is a disgrace!

Do you think you should have won the fight?

taffytoon wrote:

diggler wrote:taf is eddie hearn, jane couch and kevin mitchel delusional because they all had bellew winning so maybe it wasn't that clear a win

Some of the above are clear Bellew fans who will watch the fight back IMHO and realise he lost.

so everyone who had bellew winning is biast or his mate get a grip

Bomber 1 wrote:I've watched it back 3 times and I'm a honest person! I didn't Lise that fight and Parris is a disgrace!

Watch the interview again, you said you had lost? Your whole body language at the final bell says you lost.

Realistic wrote:

Bomber 1 wrote:I've watched it back 3 times and I'm a honest person! I didn't Lise that fight and Parris is a disgrace!

Watch the interview again, you said you had lost? Your whole body language at the final bell says you lost.

how the hell does his body language say he lost the fight?????

he jumped up on all 4 corners of the ring and raised his hand thinking he won.

then when he was getting interviewed and he knew he had lost his body language was then a look of pure disappointment.