BoxRec

114-114???

This is happening too often..... at least one of them with the 119-110 scorecard actually watched the fight.

What a farce.

That was scandalous, how on earth did he come up with that?

LeedsLad wrote:114-114???

This is happening too often..... at least one of them with the 119-110 scorecard actually watched the fight.

What a farce.

Think I gave Purdy 2 rounds but it was a clear fight for Lyno.

Ian John Lewis simply didn't seem to watch the fight. This is the same guy who let Briggs go 12 rounds against Vitali and scored Ainscough v Reed round 3 10-10. The poor bloke really needs to be told to go away.

what a master class well done col

I had Purdy knocking him out, that was more like the Lynes that we saw around the time of the Branco robbery.

I seem to moan about the judges every week, but ffs

How far does it have to go before something is done?

Imagine the outcry if someone had scored Calzaghe vs Lacy 115-113 to Calzaghe.... this fight wasn't all that far off a Lacy'ing if we are being honest.

Lynes threw more every round and probably landed more every round, and scored a knockdown - which he needed according to IJL.

If Stevie Wonder ever gets bored of singing there's always a job scoring fights it seems.

LeedsLad wrote:I had Purdy knocking him out, that was more like the Lynes that we saw around the time of the Branco robbery.

I seem to moan about the judges every week, but ffs

How far does it have to go before something is done?

Imagine the outcry if someone had scored Calzaghe vs Lacy 115-113 to Calzaghe.... this fight wasn't all that far off a Lacy'ing if we are being honest.

Lynes threw more every round and probably landed more every round, and scored a knockdown - which he needed according to IJL.

If Stevie Wonder ever gets bored of singing there's always a job scoring fights it seems.

Crap I forgot all about the knock down...so he must have had it...erm...2 drawn rounds...and then 6-4 to Purdy?...eurgh

iamasadlittleboy wrote:

LeedsLad wrote:I had Purdy knocking him out, that was more like the Lynes that we saw around the time of the Branco robbery.

I seem to moan about the judges every week, but ffs

How far does it have to go before something is done?

Imagine the outcry if someone had scored Calzaghe vs Lacy 115-113 to Calzaghe.... this fight wasn't all that far off a Lacy'ing if we are being honest.

Lynes threw more every round and probably landed more every round, and scored a knockdown - which he needed according to IJL.

If Stevie Wonder ever gets bored of singing there's always a job scoring fights it seems.

Crap I forgot all about the knock down...so he must have had it...erm...2 drawn rounds...and then 6-4 to Purdy?...eurgh

This is an interesting point, I forgot all about the Knockdown, had it not been for that apparently we would have been looking at a Split Decision victory for lynes. I cannot express how utterly disgusted I am at that scorecard, but what happens? There's no repercussions for judge involved, and I'll still be watching next week. Sickening.

Surely two British officials scored it right

Whoever is the promoter's lad, he will, invariably, get the nod.

And they don't care how ridiculus It looks. People will forget it and it will happen again.

IJL doesn't score knockdowns we all know that now!

gobbles wrote:Surely two British officials scored it right

Exactly - don't agree with the thread title though IJL was clearly way off.

I did have it a lot closer than other people 116-111 to Lynes but can't excuse IJL scorecard at all, if there was no knockdown he scored that fight to Purdy