Page 1 of 1

murray.macklin.barker

Posted: 03 Dec 2011, 11:55
by leeharding
so now we have seen them all in top level fights,who do you think would be no1 if all 3 met. ide go for murray :TU: :TU:

Re: murray.macklin.barker

Posted: 03 Dec 2011, 12:30
by tear up
ill have barker :TU:

Re: murray.macklin.barker

Posted: 03 Dec 2011, 12:55
by Dan Dares
id have murray

Re: murray.macklin.barker

Posted: 03 Dec 2011, 13:14
by pyenest77
Tough one. It would be a great Eubank-Watson-Benn type trilogy, but chances are they are all going in different directions. I would go for Barker, but its a difficult one!

Re: murray.macklin.barker

Posted: 03 Dec 2011, 13:22
by Andypittcov
Thought macklin then changed to barker after his excellent effort with Martinez now after last night I'm edging towards Murray. Eff knows it's that close.

Re: murray.macklin.barker

Posted: 03 Dec 2011, 13:25
by Tommy Gunn13
Barker&Murray for me with Macklin just behind...

Re: murray.macklin.barker

Posted: 03 Dec 2011, 13:27
by smcb80
i'd say it will take for one of them to get a belt before they all fight each other. would be a series of huge fights for all of them

Re: murray.macklin.barker

Posted: 03 Dec 2011, 13:41
by leforge
One of them needs a world title for it to happen.If I was Eddie Hearn get Geal next or Sturm for Barker. Hoping Murray get Sturm again!

Re: murray.macklin.barker

Posted: 03 Dec 2011, 14:28
by Camcas
1) Barker
2) Murray
3) Macklin

Re: murray.macklin.barker

Posted: 03 Dec 2011, 14:34
by smcb80
throw Andy Lee into the mix as well.

Re: murray.macklin.barker

Posted: 03 Dec 2011, 14:48
by SAPFO
Image

Re: murray.macklin.barker

Posted: 03 Dec 2011, 14:48
by SAPFO
Barker v Strum would be interesting..

Re: murray.macklin.barker

Posted: 03 Dec 2011, 15:59
by leeharding
carlbcfc wrote:Barker v Strum would be interesting..
i think it would and to tell you the truth i dont think sterm will want a remach :TU:

Re: murray.macklin.barker

Posted: 03 Dec 2011, 16:16
by Matt W
Barker's the best of the 3 for me and I'd pick him over Sturm.

Re: murray.macklin.barker

Posted: 03 Dec 2011, 16:22
by SAPFO
leeharding wrote:
carlbcfc wrote:Barker v Strum would be interesting..
i think it would and to tell you the truth i dont think sterm will want a remach :TU:
He has never fought him :KO:

Re: murray.macklin.barker

Posted: 03 Dec 2011, 21:18
by leeharding
carlbcfc wrote:
leeharding wrote:
carlbcfc wrote:Barker v Strum would be interesting..
i think it would and to tell you the truth i dont think sterm will want a remach :TU:
He has never fought him :KO:
murray remach we mean m8 :TU: