Page 1 of 1
Todays Boxing news
Posted: 30 Jan 2004, 12:17
by REAL_DEAL
Did anyone buy todays issue?
The paper was spolied and hadly had any coverage on the sprott - williams fight and undercard
Once again the boxing news team got seats behind a pole
They didnt put the fight on the front cover only the gatti match and the middleweight wookie fight tonight
This is unfair on readers and the boxers themself
Sort it out now
Re: Todays Boxing news
Posted: 30 Jan 2004, 12:28
by bennie
REAL_DEAL wrote:Did anyone buy todays issue?
The paper was spolied and hadly had any coverage on the sprott - williams fight and undercard
Once again the boxing news team got seats behind a pole
They didnt put the fight on the front cover only the gatti match and the middleweight wookie fight tonight
This is unfair on readers and the boxers themself
Sort it out now
You can only write what you see.
I remember allegedly's quote years ago concerning the boxing press: "You give them the best seat in the house," he said, "and they slag off your fighter!"
But Boxing News has never been anti-Warren, or anti-anyone. It's the most neutral - most thorough - British boxing publication out there (Boxing Monthly concentrates far more on the American scene). The part-time hacks who slag off Warren's fighters still get the best seat in the house; Boxing News tells it how it is impartially, and gets stuck behind a pole.
Harry Mullan is spinning in his grave.
Posted: 30 Jan 2004, 12:34
by MightyWarrior
Just pathetic - FW behaves like a spoilt kid, taking his ball home with him.
I suppose he thinks Kev Mitchell should be on the front page next week, after his latest astounding win against the odds.
Posted: 30 Jan 2004, 12:50
by DIRT SUGAR
I saw where the BN guys were put and it was embarrassing.
They couldn't see sweet FA. I should know, because I was sat behind them. (Note to SN: I'm not complaining, as my seat behind them was a better view and writing for a local newspaper (even though it won the weekly newspaper of the year award last year) I don't expect a top-notch seat and am thankful for getting one at all, honest :) )
Posted: 30 Jan 2004, 13:11
by knockout artist
Frank needs a slap.
How about him and Claude over 6 two's?
I reckon Claude would spark him.
Old Claude looks a bit trim and lively.
Posted: 30 Jan 2004, 13:14
by bennie
DIRT SUGAR wrote:I saw where the BN guys were put and it was embarrassing.
They couldn't see sweet FA. I should know, because I was sat behind them. (Note to SN: I'm not complaining, as my seat behind them was a better view and writing for a local newspaper (even though it won the weekly newspaper of the year award last year) I don't expect a top-notch seat and am thankful for getting one at all, honest :) )
Dirt, what's the situation with Takaloo! Has he been unfairly stripped of his WBU title for losing the non-title fight to Monteiro?
Posted: 30 Jan 2004, 19:01
by Southpaw Stylist
knockout artist wrote:Frank needs a slap.
How about him and Claude over 6 two's?
I reckon Claude would spark him.
Old Claude looks a bit trim and lively.
Haha!
That celebrity boxing thing would be good actually.
Posted: 30 Jan 2004, 19:07
by bennie
Claude once sparred a peak Naz in Sheffield.
Posted: 30 Jan 2004, 19:07
by Southpaw Stylist
How'd he get on?
Posted: 30 Jan 2004, 19:09
by bennie
Southpaw Stylist wrote:How'd he get on?
Not too bad. But Naz showed him who was boss a couple of times.
Posted: 30 Jan 2004, 19:09
by REAL_DEAL
bennie wrote:Claude once sparred a peak Naz in Sheffield.
i have that on tape somewhere, naz played around and ingle pulled claude out
Posted: 30 Jan 2004, 19:10
by bennie
REAL_DEAL wrote:bennie wrote:Claude once sparred a peak Naz in Sheffield.
i have that on tape somewhere, naz played around and ingle pulled claude out
allegedly would pay good money for that tape. Dig it out when you get the time, Chris. I'll pay for a copy, too.
Posted: 30 Jan 2004, 19:14
by REAL_DEAL
i will look for it tomorrow, claude had hair then
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Posted: 30 Jan 2004, 19:17
by bennie
REAL_DEAL wrote:i will look for it tomorrow, claude had hair then
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Cheers, mate. I fancy Abrams to win the rematch.

Posted: 31 Jan 2004, 07:02
by steve689
Looks like Frank has been feeling a little sensitive lately and has been getting on the case of Boxing Monthly editor Glyn Leach. Last month in his column Leach criticised the fact that Lawrence Murphy was fighting for a "World" title against Elcock while still a novice. In this months edition there is a small denote in his column saying he never considered Sports Network to be reckless and apologised if he gave the wrong impression etc He then goes on to say he repects Frank and that he is the best promoter and knows him well on a personal level blah blah So i think the Sports Network PR wagon rolled into BM offices after his first piece...At this rate Frank will have no friends left in Boxing.