BoxRec

Peterson wins a SD

113-112
113-112
110-115

See the official scorecards here:

http://news.boxrec.com/news/2011/view-o ... v-peterson

Terrible decision and whole fight had a bit of a robbery feeling.

Had it 8-3-1 Khan.

At the most i could have had it 7-5/6-6 but no way did Peterson do anywhere near enough to win.

I didn't think it was a terrible decision, and imo your card is much worse than the official ones.

To those who didn't catch the commentators' scores, Watt had it 113-112 Peterson and Lederman had Khan winning by one point.

exittored wrote:Terrible decision and whole fight had a bit of a robbery feeling.

Had it 8-3-1 Khan.

At the most i could have had it 7-5/6-6 but no way did Peterson do anywhere near enough to win.

6-6 means Peterson wins with the deductions

i dont have a huge issue with the scoring , but i think the ref was poor , he cost kahn that fight in my view .

exittored wrote:Terrible decision and whole fight had a bit of a robbery feeling.

Had it 8-3-1 Khan.

At the most i could have had it 7-5/6-6 but no way did Peterson do anywhere near enough to win.

What fight were you watching.

He was holding, elbowing, pushing and headlocking from the first round.

Khan didnt know what to do on the inside when he wasnt allowed hold.

Lamont was all over him like a rash and deserved the win and his will to win when gased was remarkable.

rematch please.

crusader wrote:

exittored wrote:Terrible decision and whole fight had a bit of a robbery feeling.

Had it 8-3-1 Khan.

At the most i could have had it 7-5/6-6 but no way did Peterson do anywhere near enough to win.

6-6 means Peterson wins with the deductions

I was watching HBO feed and i don't watch no BS sky commentators, have got the rds live as i did them..where are your rds?

At the most in terms of a robbery.

10 guys on here scored the fight live and we all had Khan winning.

Joke of a decision. Joke of a ref.

PS - Jonny Nelson is the most annoying man on British telly. Useless, annoying, know-nothing twat!

Terrrrry wrote:Joke of a decision. Joke of a ref.

PS - Jonny Nelson is the most annoying man on British telly. Useless, annoying, know-nothing twat!

Totally agree with this, not sure what the others were watching but i guess we'll get an immediate rematch which is the best thing that can happen.

Good fight though.

Peterson deserved to win, Khan was warned at least 10-15 times before each point deduction, his problem is he is used to preferential treatment, Khan is just not as good as he likes to think, he spend the last 8 rounds running away and lying on the ropes taking a pounding.

I scored it 113-112 Peterson.

damianhucker1 wrote:i dont have a huge issue with the scoring , but i think the ref was poor , he cost kahn that fight in my view .

well khan's had many things his way, he's a world champ so why shouldn't he fight in another guy's backyard and have some points deducted for spoiling?

exittored wrote:

crusader wrote:

exittored wrote:Terrible decision and whole fight had a bit of a robbery feeling.

Had it 8-3-1 Khan.

At the most i could have had it 7-5/6-6 but no way did Peterson do anywhere near enough to win.

6-6 means Peterson wins with the deductions

I was watching HBO feed and i don't watch no BS sky commentators, have got the rds live as i did them..where are your rds?

At the most in terms of a robbery.

10 guys on here scored the fight live and we all had Khan winning.

I only turned the sound on after the fight was over, so my scoring wasn't influenced by any 'BS' commentary. BTW, isn't HBO a BS team if their judge had Khan winning by only one point? Posting scores on a forum doesn't somehow make them more credible, but since you seem to think I'll post my card.

6-5-1 for Khan with the deductions evening the fight out. Some of the rounds were close, so I can see a wider win for Khan and have no problem with a one point win for Peterson.

1. Khan
2. Khan
3. Peterson
4. Peterson
5 Khan
6. Khan
7. Peterson
8. Peterson
9. Khan
10. Khan
11. Peterson
12. Even

Autobarn wrote:

damianhucker1 wrote:i dont have a huge issue with the scoring , but i think the ref was poor , he cost kahn that fight in my view .

well khan's had many things his way, he's a world champ so why shouldn't he fight in another guy's backyard and have some points deducted for spoiling?

??????

didnt realise boxing in someone elses city meant the ref had to go against you ????

damianhucker1 wrote:

Autobarn wrote:

damianhucker1 wrote:i dont have a huge issue with the scoring , but i think the ref was poor , he cost kahn that fight in my view .

well khan's had many things his way, he's a world champ so why shouldn't he fight in another guy's backyard and have some points deducted for spoiling?

??????

didnt realise boxing in someone elses city meant the ref had to go against you ????

The referee wasn't against him, Khan was using illegal tactics which he has got away with in every fight, the referee warned him consistantly before deducting a point.

crusader wrote:

exittored wrote:

crusader wrote:

6-6 means Peterson wins with the deductions

I was watching HBO feed and i don't watch no BS sky commentators, have got the rds live as i did them..where are your rds?

At the most in terms of a robbery.

10 guys on here scored the fight live and we all had Khan winning.

I only turned the sound on after the fight was over, so my scoring wasn't influenced by the commentary. Posting scores on a forum doesn't somehow make them more credible, but since you seem to think I'll post my card.

6-5-1 for Khan with the deductions evening the fight out. Some of the rounds were close, so I can see a wider win for Khan and have no problem with a one point win for Peterson.

1. Khan
2. Khan
3. Peterson
4. Peterson
5 Khan
6. Khan
7. Peterson
8. Peterson
9. Khan
10. Khan
11. Peterson
12. Even

You scored the 12th even?????

Peterson was walking forward.... and getting tagged by Khan constantly. I'm not sure he landed more than three effective shots in that round.

Carbo wrote:

crusader wrote:

exittored wrote: I was watching HBO feed and i don't watch no BS sky commentators, have got the rds live as i did them..where are your rds?

At the most in terms of a robbery.

10 guys on here scored the fight live and we all had Khan winning.

I only turned the sound on after the fight was over, so my scoring wasn't influenced by the commentary. Posting scores on a forum doesn't somehow make them more credible, but since you seem to think I'll post my card.

6-5-1 for Khan with the deductions evening the fight out. Some of the rounds were close, so I can see a wider win for Khan and have no problem with a one point win for Peterson.

1. Khan
2. Khan
3. Peterson
4. Peterson
5 Khan
6. Khan
7. Peterson
8. Peterson
9. Khan
10. Khan
11. Peterson
12. Even

You scored the 12th even?????

Peterson was walking forward.... and getting tagged by Khan constantly. I'm not sure he landed more than three effective shots in that round.

Did you watch the fight? Khan was deducted a point.

crusader wrote:

exittored wrote:

crusader wrote:

6-6 means Peterson wins with the deductions

I was watching HBO feed and i don't watch no BS sky commentators, have got the rds live as i did them..where are your rds?

At the most in terms of a robbery.

10 guys on here scored the fight live and we all had Khan winning.

I only turned the sound on after the fight was over, so my scoring wasn't influenced by any 'BS' commentary. BTW, isn't HBO a BS team if their judge had Khan winning by only one point? Posting scores on a forum doesn't somehow make them more credible, but since you seem to think I'll post my card.

6-5-1 for Khan with the deductions evening the fight out. Some of the rounds were close, so I can see a wider win for Khan and have no problem with a one point win for Peterson.

1. Khan
2. Khan
3. Peterson
4. Peterson
5 Khan
6. Khan
7. Peterson
8. Peterson
9. Khan
10. Khan
11. Peterson
12. Even

I don't even think you know what you're talking about so not sure how the rest of us are supposed to know...you contradict yourself about 5 times.

crusader wrote:

Carbo wrote:

crusader wrote: I only turned the sound on after the fight was over, so my scoring wasn't influenced by the commentary. Posting scores on a forum doesn't somehow make them more credible, but since you seem to think I'll post my card.

6-5-1 for Khan with the deductions evening the fight out. Some of the rounds were close, so I can see a wider win for Khan and have no problem with a one point win for Peterson.

1. Khan
2. Khan
3. Peterson
4. Peterson
5 Khan
6. Khan
7. Peterson
8. Peterson
9. Khan
10. Khan
11. Peterson
12. Even

You scored the 12th even?????

Peterson was walking forward.... and getting tagged by Khan constantly. I'm not sure he landed more than three effective shots in that round.

Did you watch the fight? Khan was deducted a point.

Ah, shit. I thought that was without the deductions. Soz.

Back to fighting tomato cans in Bolton

exittored wrote:

crusader wrote:

exittored wrote: I was watching HBO feed and i don't watch no BS sky commentators, have got the rds live as i did them..where are your rds?

At the most in terms of a robbery.

10 guys on here scored the fight live and we all had Khan winning.

I only turned the sound on after the fight was over, so my scoring wasn't influenced by any 'BS' commentary. BTW, isn't HBO a BS team if their judge had Khan winning by only one point? Posting scores on a forum doesn't somehow make them more credible, but since you seem to think I'll post my card.

6-5-1 for Khan with the deductions evening the fight out. Some of the rounds were close, so I can see a wider win for Khan and have no problem with a one point win for Peterson.

1. Khan
2. Khan
3. Peterson
4. Peterson
5 Khan
6. Khan
7. Peterson
8. Peterson
9. Khan
10. Khan
11. Peterson
12. Even

I don't even think you know what you're talking about so not sure how the rest of us are supposed to know...you contradict yourself about 5 times.

whatever bro. This is coming from the guy screaming robbery who said he could have had it 6-6

damianhucker1 wrote:i dont have a huge issue with the scoring , but i think the ref was poor , he cost kahn that fight in my view .

The ref cant deduct points for pushing and holding if he's allowing the other fighter to bull forward with his head down and infront of his lead foot. He didnt call break properly and kept telling khan to step back but let peterson pounce on him while he did that. Having said that khan needs to learn to fight on the inside and hold his ground a bit more, instead of running around the ring non stop and trying to be macho.

YES the ref was poor but khan threw the fight away. There will be a rematch in vegas and peterson will get ruined.

Hayemaker wrote:Back to fighting tomato cans in Bolton

No there'll be a rematch which he'll win but definatetely no Mayweather fight in 2012.

kingfinn wrote:The ref cant deduct points for pushing and holding if he's allowing the other fighter to bull forward with his head down and infront of his league foot.

Nail on the head.

Big mistake by Team Khan and GBP allowing this fight to take place in DC.

exittored wrote:

Hayemaker wrote:Back to fighting tomato cans in Bolton

No there'll be a rematch which he'll win but definatetely no Mayweather fight in 2012.

Khan showed tonight that mayweather would beat him fairly easily, khan will get back in the gym work on his weaknesses and come back a far better fighter.