Page 1 of 3

IS BBC BOXING IS FINISHED?

Posted: 03 Feb 2004, 09:53
by Lugh
It is my understanding that the only reason the Beeb got back into boxing was Greg Dyke's interest and track record with the sport - he (apparently) started as a sports reporter and covered York Hall shows in the 70's.

Dyke has been forced out of the BBC, Audley has hardly been an unparallelled success and the biggest bouts to date (IMO) Williams-Sinal Sam, Walker-Karmazin have done nothing to bring glory to the Beeb stable.

Where that leaves the future of Terrestrial TV Boxing I don't know?

Posted: 03 Feb 2004, 10:26
by bigfatjourneyman
Do you have any inside knowledge or is it just a guess of yours?

Posted: 03 Feb 2004, 10:28
by bennie
bigfatjourneyman wrote:Do you have any inside knowledge or is it just a guess of yours?
Well, you seem to have inside knowledge from previous posts. Why don't you let us know what the current situation is to alleviate all the speculation...

Posted: 03 Feb 2004, 10:29
by bigfatjourneyman
I have far less knowledge than your good self Bennie

Posted: 03 Feb 2004, 10:31
by bennie
bigfatjourneyman wrote:I have far less knowledge than your good self Bennie
Come on...spill the beans. We all know you're a BBC journalist. :wink:

Posted: 03 Feb 2004, 10:34
by bigfatjourneyman
I can promise you I am not a BBC journalist!!!

Posted: 03 Feb 2004, 10:37
by stujones
Andrew Gillighan by any chance??He's not a BBC Journalist.

:lol:

Posted: 03 Feb 2004, 10:39
by bennie
I hope to God it's not Jim Neilly after all I've said.

Posted: 03 Feb 2004, 10:42
by shakermaker
bennie wrote:I hope to God it's not Jim Neilly after all I've said.
haha :lol:

me too he gets a drilling from nearly every poster.

I don't think the BBC will ditch boxing completely.....it might be scaled back a little but I can see shows being put in the slot after match of the day on sat nights from next season.

Posted: 03 Feb 2004, 10:47
by Lugh
bigfatjourneyman wrote:Do you have any inside knowledge or is it just a guess of yours?
Well it's obviously not a guess, as it is based on a series of "facts" that are outlined below the question.

:D :D Are you sure you aren't Andrew Gillighan? :D :D

Posted: 03 Feb 2004, 11:17
by JimStone
Big Daddy Bunce?

Posted: 03 Feb 2004, 11:46
by nasty
Hey LUGH, are you that Cu#t allegedly?

This is the LAST TIME I'M SAYING THIS SO LISTEN VERY CAREFULLY!


Let me tell you that the BBC is fully behind boxing and plans to inject more money into it in 2004 THAN 2003.

Also, it see's the return of MOTD as a perfect way to launch LIVE BOXING.

This is how it will work :

MOTD - 10.OO PM till 11.15pm
LIVE BOXING - 11.15pm till 1.00pm

SO STOP SPREADING RUMOURS THAT THE BBC IS SCRAPPING BOXING. IT'S 100% BEHIND BOXING!

It see's Boxing and Football as a perfect combination to bring back BBC SPORT TO THE TOP AGAIN!

Any more SLANDER about BBC commitment to BOXING will not be TOLERATED!

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2004 WILL BE THE YEAR OF MIKE TYSON
http://www.doghouseboxing.com/Parodies/Mike_Tyson.html

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HELP SAVE AMERICA FROM G.W.BUSH
VOTE FOR THE GREATEST PRESIDENT AMERICA WILL EVER HAVE!
VOTE GOV. HOWARD DEAN FOR PRESIDENT IN 2004
http://www.deanforamerica.com

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted: 03 Feb 2004, 11:49
by Goz
nasty wrote:Also, it see's the return of MOTD as a perfect way to launch LIVE BOXING.

This is how it will work :

MOTD - 10.OO PM till 11.15pm
LIVE BOXING - 11.15pm till 1.00pm

SO STOP SPREADING RUMOURS THAT THE BBC IS SCRAPPING BOXING. IT'S 100% BEHIND BOXING!
Much as I see you as a babbling lunatic I agree with you entirely on this and have said something similar myself in the past.

A whole nation full of football fans, sitting at home after the footy with a few bevvies inside them and right after MOTD on comes the boxing. I reckon there's a great chance that 50% might hang on to see what the first fight is like....

Posted: 03 Feb 2004, 12:05
by nasty
It absolutely Pisses me off that people keep saying IS BBC BOXING FINISHED without basing it on nothing except ' now that Greg Dyke has left.......'

BBC have the 3 hottest boxer's Britain has produced for a long,long time in AUDLEY HARRISON, DAVID HAYE and CARL FROCH.

Plus they have guys like ROBIN REID, HERBIE HIDE, CARL THOMPSON, CLINTON WOODS, HOWARD EASTMAN and NICKY COOK.

In the next 2 years, the BBC WILL OVERTAKE SKY in terms of coverage once their BBC SPORTS CHANNEL is up and running!

Ask Joe calzaghe whether he'd prefer to be on the BBC or SKY and he'll say BBC everytime

Hopefully this is an end to the matter!



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2004 WILL BE THE YEAR OF MIKE TYSON
http://www.doghouseboxing.com/Parodies/Mike_Tyson.html

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HELP SAVE AMERICA FROM G.W.BUSH
VOTE FOR THE GREATEST PRESIDENT AMERICA WILL EVER HAVE!
VOTE GOV. HOWARD DEAN FOR PRESIDENT IN 2004
http://www.deanforamerica.com

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted: 03 Feb 2004, 12:10
by JimStone
nasty wrote:Ask Joe calzaghe whether he'd prefer to be on the BBC or SKY and he'll say BBC everytime
When did Joe say that, and what did his promoter and Sky say when he did?

Posted: 03 Feb 2004, 12:19
by nasty
Well, the reason allegedly is so bitter with the BBC is because when his contract with Sky was running out, he started talking with the BBC so that he could jump ship to them.

The BBC decided to ignore Warren and go with his Rivals instead i.e Hobson etc.

Warren was desperate to join the BBC and hates them now for rejecting him!

As for Calzaghe, the fact is that he is more famous for appearing on shows like Question of sport and TTIAO than for his boxing on Sky.

Calzaghe is desperate to fight on the BBC and has stated it privately many times!

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2004 WILL BE THE YEAR OF MIKE TYSON
http://www.doghouseboxing.com/Parodies/Mike_Tyson.html

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HELP SAVE AMERICA FROM G.W.BUSH
VOTE FOR THE GREATEST PRESIDENT AMERICA WILL EVER HAVE!
VOTE GOV. HOWARD DEAN FOR PRESIDENT IN 2004
http://www.deanforamerica.com

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted: 03 Feb 2004, 12:30
by JimStone
nasty wrote: Calzaghe is desperate to fight on the BBC and has stated it privately many times!
So the next time his contract is up he will sign with a BBC promoter?

Also what is TTIAO an abbreviation for? Thanks

Posted: 03 Feb 2004, 12:38
by nasty
Well, his promoter is allegedly so I doubt it but if he leaves Warren than maybe!

Rememeber THIS!

WHO GOT THE FIGHT WITH RJJ

WAS IT CLINTON WOODS or JOE CALZAGHE?

of course CLINTON WOODS

Calzaghe should sign with DENNIS HOBSON and get the big fights!

Basically, Warren has been Blackballed by most of the world's promoters and this is why he can't get the BIG FIGHTS!

Both Ricky Hatton and Calzaghe should leave Warren if they want their carreer's to prosper.


TTIAO = They think its all over.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2004 WILL BE THE YEAR OF MIKE TYSON
http://www.doghouseboxing.com/Parodies/Mike_Tyson.html

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HELP SAVE AMERICA FROM G.W.BUSH
VOTE FOR THE GREATEST PRESIDENT AMERICA WILL EVER HAVE!
VOTE GOV. HOWARD DEAN FOR PRESIDENT IN 2004
http://www.deanforamerica.com

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted: 03 Feb 2004, 12:54
by silkov
You make a lot of good points Nasty which I agree with... I believe that if they carry on in the direction they are going and introduce live shows and also put some fights on earlier then the BBC are in the position to overtake Sky in their coverage of boxing. People are tired of seeing dubious title fights appear on Sky week after week.... they want real quality fights between well matched fighters.... I really believe this is why Frankie has become so rattled and touchy of late, he can see whats going on and he's worried!........

Posted: 03 Feb 2004, 17:39
by BunglesFingers
nasty wrote: Warren was desperate to join the BBC and hates them now for rejecting him!
Doesnt FW hate everyone who rejects him?


Anyway if the BBC get off their arses and get a dedicated sports channel up and running (why is it taking so long??) that should at least get their boxing on at a better time slot.

Sticking it on after MOTD - good idea that!

Nasty

Posted: 03 Feb 2004, 18:32
by catweazle
Nasty,your making it up as you go along.You can't put words into peoples mouths - fighters don't give a monkeys which network they fight on and since when is calzaghe famous for being on a QOS ?
Do be quiet and only come back when you've thought of something more intelligent to say.Your George Bush nonsense would be more appreciated by michael Moore.

Posted: 04 Feb 2004, 08:15
by nasty
Catweazle wrote :
Your George Bush nonsense would be more appreciated by michael Moore.
I think this tell's us everything about your intellect!

What I post here is based on hard facts unlike YOUR MISERABLE POSTS!

Most of the British public will know Calzaghe more from his appearance's on QoS and other tererestial programs.

Is this too hard for you to understand.

Does he have the Public profile of Benn, Cooper, Hamed, Eubank or Bruno?

The answer is no because those fighters spent a large part of their career's on Terrestial!

Had Calzaghe been boxing on ITV or the BBC he'd be a superstar now rather than the forgotten man of boxing!

You are obviously one of allegedly's little stooges that patrol Boxrec.

Well, You can FU~K OFF.



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2004 WILL BE THE YEAR OF MIKE TYSON
http://www.doghouseboxing.com/Parodies/Mike_Tyson.html

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HELP SAVE AMERICA FROM G.W.BUSH
VOTE FOR THE GREATEST PRESIDENT AMERICA WILL EVER HAVE!
VOTE GOV. HOWARD DEAN FOR PRESIDENT IN 2004
http://www.deanforamerica.com

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted: 04 Feb 2004, 09:12
by Kilburn
As much as I absolutely love boxing on the BBC (not the way it's presented so much but the fact that you're watching with a much bigger audience) it's not a given that any fighter who makes a career on there will be a superstar.

Hatton and Calzaghe are very good fighters but have ZERO personality. They're not funny, they're not interesting, they're not controversial. They're nothing like Benn and Eubank.

Ricky and Joe could have been much more popular country wide had they had all their fights on the beeb, but superstars? I think not.

Posted: 04 Feb 2004, 09:15
by Kilburn
Oh and Nasty you berk, I'm sure if you ever took the chance to watch catweazle fight you'd be showing far more respect.

Posted: 04 Feb 2004, 09:38
by stujones
Kilburn wrote:As much as I absolutely love boxing on the BBC (not the way it's presented so much but the fact that you're watching with a much bigger audience) it's not a given that any fighter who makes a career on there will be a superstar.

Hatton and Calzaghe are very good fighters but have ZERO personality. They're not funny, they're not interesting, they're not controversial. They're nothing like Benn and Eubank.

Ricky and Joe could have been much more popular country wide had they had all their fights on the beeb, but superstars? I think not.
Good points Kilburn, but couldn't the same be said of Steve Robinson (personality wise). Yet he in Wales was certainly far more popular than Joe. I can think of two reasons why this might be other than the Sky vs BBC/ITV thing.

1) Robinson for many of his defences was the underdog and his opponent was considered a threat, similar things cannot be said of Calzaghe.

2) Calzaghe's Italian roots, yes I do think it plays a part.

As far as Calzaghe, he used to be quite controversial when he'd moan about the lack of achievments of Watt and McGuigan when they were critical of him. Also, as much as American press have tried there is nothing controverisial as DLH, and he's not that funny a guy. Yet, he's huge - but that's because the girls love him. But Calzaghe is a very good looking guy, shouldn't he be Britain's DLH.