Terry Norris v Gerald Mclellan.
Posted: 31 Dec 2011, 14:48
Lets say Terry Norris moves up to 160 in mid 93 and targets the middleweight throne and Mclellan. Hopkins fights Jones for one set of the title and Mclellan and Norris meet for the other significant half of the title.
How do u see Norris v mclellan panning out.
I see Mclellan being far too big and powerful. Norris was a guy who always had an eye on the welterweight division and was always offering its best fighters catchweight fights at 150. Norris would probably go into a Mclellan battle a blown up 158. Mclellan was a big drier and would probably outweigh norris by 10 pounds on fightnight,
Still its interesting due to their common foes, and the fact norris could also bang and was faster and more skilled.
How do you see it?
How do u see Norris v mclellan panning out.
I see Mclellan being far too big and powerful. Norris was a guy who always had an eye on the welterweight division and was always offering its best fighters catchweight fights at 150. Norris would probably go into a Mclellan battle a blown up 158. Mclellan was a big drier and would probably outweigh norris by 10 pounds on fightnight,
Still its interesting due to their common foes, and the fact norris could also bang and was faster and more skilled.
How do you see it?