Page 1 of 3
allegedly
Posted: 05 Jan 2012, 06:03
by REEVE
anyone else sick of the same repeats over and over?? I must of seen bellew/clev 6 times and burns katsidis about the same.
Surely mr warren must have thousands of hours of footage of naz etc that can be re shown instead of the same repeats over and over.
I also think i have seen the 2 worst pros of all time on his show from dusseldorf the 2 middleweights looked like theyd just been pulled in from the street

Re: Allegedly Channel
Posted: 05 Jan 2012, 06:12
by iamasadlittleboy
If memory serves one of the German middleweights was actually a welterweight with a sumo belly and aged about 17.
Re: Allegedly Channel
Posted: 05 Jan 2012, 06:22
by REEVE
iamasadlittleboy wrote:If memory serves one of the German middleweights was actually a welterweight with a sumo belly and aged about 17.
aye thats the one mate

they were both unbeaten aswell which is unreal - imagine what one of our 4-0 lads would of done with them.
Re: Allegedly Channel
Posted: 05 Jan 2012, 06:57
by Josh1111
Plenty people warned about this happening. You chose to gamble and pay £10 a month for it
Re: Allegedly Channel
Posted: 05 Jan 2012, 07:14
by REEVE
i know mate and i regretting it now tbh - there best be some decent cards on in the next couple of months or its going the journey

Re: Allegedly Channel
Posted: 05 Jan 2012, 07:55
by taffytoon
I am also regretting signing up for 6 Months

At least put a live small hall show on or SOMETHING!!!
Re: Allegedly Channel
Posted: 05 Jan 2012, 08:06
by REEVE
taffytoon wrote:I am also regretting signing up for 6 Months

At least put a live small hall show on or SOMETHING!!!
exactly mate or at least something that hasnt already been shown in the last 2 days - its a bit of joke really

Re: Allegedly Channel
Posted: 05 Jan 2012, 08:53
by DavidPayne
If you put your head in a lions mouth and you look like a gullible Gazelle....
Re: Allegedly Channel
Posted: 05 Jan 2012, 09:01
by Dirk Kelly
Who actually owns the rights to all those Sports Network fights with Naz, Joe C etc?
Is it Frank or would it have been his promotional company, Sports Network and when this went into administration did someone buy them?
Stupid question but I take it boxers don't get a royalty every time one of their old fights is shown like actors do? Wonder if boxers will try for this in the future when channels will be showing old fights in a continous reel.
Re: Allegedly Channel
Posted: 05 Jan 2012, 09:38
by smcb80
there's a show on in Belfast in Feb, Willie Casey may be on it, they should pick the likes of these up.
any live boxing at all would be great.
Re: Allegedly Channel
Posted: 05 Jan 2012, 09:39
by taffytoon
smcb80 wrote:there's a show on in Belfast in Feb, Willie Casey may be on it, they should pick the likes of these up.
any live boxing at all would be great.
Agreed, there are Many Many small shows that would love to be put on a live broadcast.
Re: Allegedly Channel
Posted: 05 Jan 2012, 09:47
by twenty six
Dirk,
I would say the TV Company owns the rights - that's probably where there is an issue.
Remember Sky / ITV paid the Promotor to televise.
Similar to football.
Everyone had to buy the rights even for delayed coverage.
The Club owns nowt.
Likewise the boxer gets nowt on replays.
As for the small hall shows I have to agree. I really thought BN would have been looking to show these.
How no one wanted to show Dave Coldwell's show at the Magna with Curt and Ryan top of the bill I don't know as an example.
Re: Allegedly Channel
Posted: 05 Jan 2012, 09:51
by stujones
Dirk Kelly wrote:Who actually owns the rights to all those Sports Network fights with Naz, Joe C etc?
Is it Frank or would it have been his promotional company, Sports Network and when this went into administration did someone buy them?
Stupid question but I take it boxers don't get a royalty every time one of their old fights is shown like actors do? Wonder if boxers will try for this in the future when channels will be showing old fights in a continous reel.
Its a good question, it seems a complex issue. Even though boxing on TV ends with a copyright to the Broadcaster, it doesn't seem to be that easy. I remember Sportnetwork withdrawing a lot of youtube versions of old ITV "big fight" clips (even for those clips that played the fantastic theme tune) - it stated the rights were owned by SportsNetwork.
However, don't really see any "thanks to" credit when ITV chose to repeat or show clips from old boxing shows.
allegedly has shown a fair amount of repeat from the Sport Network archive (early Khan fights etc).
Re: Allegedly Channel
Posted: 05 Jan 2012, 09:55
by Josh1111
taffytoon wrote:smcb80 wrote:there's a show on in Belfast in Feb, Willie Casey may be on it, they should pick the likes of these up.
any live boxing at all would be great.
Agreed, there are Many Many small shows that would love to be put on a live broadcast.
But it all costs money and without sky money and low ticket sales for shows, where is the money going to come from?
Re: Allegedly Channel
Posted: 05 Jan 2012, 09:56
by smcb80
but how are they going to attract subscribers? with live shows or with nothing. speculate to accumulate etc..
Re: Allegedly Channel
Posted: 05 Jan 2012, 10:03
by twenty six
Josh,
allegedly is a TV Channel - so obviously the money comes from the broadcaster.
There is no competition with the small hall promotors so surely this would be a great start point for BN to show live boxing ?
How many times have you heard it said that a cracking show was missed ?
Re: Allegedly Channel
Posted: 05 Jan 2012, 10:40
by Dirk Kelly
twenty six wrote:Dirk,
I would say the TV Company owns the rights - that's probably where there is an issue.
Remember Sky / ITV paid the Promotor to televise.
Similar to football.
Everyone had to buy the rights even for delayed coverage.
The Club owns nowt.
Likewise the boxer gets nowt on replays.
As for the small hall shows I have to agree. I really thought BN would have been looking to show these.
How no one wanted to show Dave Coldwell's show at the Magna with Curt and Ryan top of the bill I don't know as an example.
Thanks for the insight and the only reason I asked was because I remember a few years ago Don King selling the rights to his fight collection for £300m so wasn't sure if the promotor or the TV nework had the rights and then if it was the promoter with sports network being wound up who actually had the right to the rights..
Re: Allegedly Channel
Posted: 05 Jan 2012, 10:40
by Ezzard
Why not just invite an old pro in for a three course dinner and a few drinks and get him to talk about his career for an hour? That can't cost much to make. That kind of content is priceless.
The potential for this channel is limitless but they need to think less like a TV channel and more like an extension of web sites like boxrec.
Re: Allegedly Channel
Posted: 05 Jan 2012, 16:30
by pyenest77
I agree. There cant be a person that has subscribed that hasnt seen Cleverly v Bellew & Cotto v Margarito. Surely the powers that be would have had something up their sleeves instead of repeats after repeats.
Re: Allegedly Channel
Posted: 05 Jan 2012, 20:35
by Finn
well im glad i didnt end up paying out the money.
Re: Allegedly Channel
Posted: 06 Jan 2012, 01:39
by jessi
It's only the 6th of January, give it a chance, there's gone be loads of live shows in the next few months

Re: Allegedly Channel
Posted: 06 Jan 2012, 04:41
by DavidPayne
Yeh....loads of Cleverly v Krapency and Mitchell v TBC.
Re: Allegedly Channel
Posted: 06 Jan 2012, 04:47
by Josh1111
jessi wrote:It's only the 6th of January, give it a chance, there's gone be loads of live shows in the next few months

But they promised 2 a week which they have failed to deliver
Re: Allegedly Channel
Posted: 06 Jan 2012, 04:54
by Tommy Gunn13
Josh1111 wrote:jessi wrote:It's only the 6th of January, give it a chance, there's gone be loads of live shows in the next few months

But they promised 2 a week which they have failed to deliver
Did you really believe they were going to put 2 on a week
![[icon_e_surprised.gif] :oo](./images/smilies/icon_e_surprised.gif)
Re: Allegedly Channel
Posted: 06 Jan 2012, 05:21
by orbtastic
Dirk Kelly wrote:twenty six wrote:Dirk,
I would say the TV Company owns the rights - that's probably where there is an issue.
Remember Sky / ITV paid the Promotor to televise.
Similar to football.
Everyone had to buy the rights even for delayed coverage.
The Club owns nowt.
Likewise the boxer gets nowt on replays.
As for the small hall shows I have to agree. I really thought BN would have been looking to show these.
How no one wanted to show Dave Coldwell's show at the Magna with Curt and Ryan top of the bill I don't know as an example.
Thanks for the insight and the only reason I asked was because I remember a few years ago Don King selling the rights to his fight collection for £300m so wasn't sure if the promotor or the TV nework had the rights and then if it was the promoter with sports network being wound up who actually had the right to the rights..
King's had his own TV channel for years.