BoxRec

Khan on Twitter today.

First he points to this article titled "Schaefer describes “worst home cooking I’ve ever seen”:

http://www.fightnews.com/Boxing/schaefe ... een-104813

After that it goes like this:

if I lost fair and square then fair enough I've lost n I move on, but does it really take over 10 minutes from the final bell to decide who's won? we've filed an appeal through and we should get a decision from the WBA and the IBF within the next 2 weeks

I'm angry as I want the rematch next to put things straight but it doesn't look like he wants it

watch the fight from 9.10 seconds of this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O4cJLcjlTrM ther is a guy wearing a grey suit with a blue shirt wearing a hat Sat on the main judges panel at the front on the right hand side 3rd to the end



No1 knows who this guy is and he is now bieng asked to move by Michael Walsh wearing the red tie who is the main supervisor for the wba as he should be sat there



he now gets a chair and sits slightly infront of @OscarDeLaHoya and my father..



At the beginning of round 2 he manages to squeeze in at the front again sat next to Michael Walsh



Now the IBF and the WBA have still not confirmed who this guy is till this date and what he was doing there.. Now the interesting part

I watched the whole fight again this time just concentrating on this guy wearing the hat, thanks to allot of friends and boxing experts who pointed this out to me

Now this guy doesn't do anything apart from watching the fight but that's only until round 6 when he starts to interfere!

From round 6 all the way through to round 12 this guy starts to interfere with what Michael Walsh is doing and they are both not watching the fight, watch the video and have a look for yourselfs

This is what I meant on how he was interfeering, as no one is allowed according to the rules to touch hold the scorescards or even talk to the judges n commision during the fight



There are 3 judges in a fight n all have different colour slips, n at the end of evry round thy get passed on to the wba ibf n dc commision

This pic shows here in round 6 the guy wearing the hat clearing picks up one of the judges white slips n if you watch the video slides it down and towards him



Another pic of the guy wearing the hat interfering different camera angle



And this guy doese it again at the beginning of round 7, n carries on throughout all the way to the end of the fight wtf?



Again in round 8 and round 9, cleary not watching the fight at all and not allowing Michael Walsh to watch too



his time in round 11 he's seen here clearly picking up a yellow judges slip.. Strictly againts the rules



I've read in some articles and people have also told me that after the fight Michael Walsh the guy in the red tie apparently said his score cards didn't match up to the others, it wasn't fair and he looked really scared and he was told to butt out and there was nothing he could do.. Since then no one has heard from him

I want Michael Walsh to come out and speak out about what was going on, its only right and fair to do so

Heres a Close up pic The question is.. Who is this guy? And what was he doing? I'm sure someone outthere knows



watch here for yourselfs round 6-12 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O4cJLcjlTrM will be interesting if we finally get our answer

it will be interesting. What ever happened and what ever he thinks. i still had him losing by 1 point so it doesn't matter to me.

I had Maidana drawing against him in their fight but Khan didnt give him a re-match so why does he deserve one?

Back, and to the left... back, and to the left... back, and to the left.

Pretty sure that guy is the infamous: TBA

Twinkle Toes wrote:Pretty sure that guy is the infamous: TBA

Twinkle Toes wrote:Pretty sure that guy is the infamous: TBA

I'm not sure anyone could afford a hat that natty with a FWP purse

Josh1111 wrote:it will be interesting. What ever happened and what ever he thinks. i still had him losing by 1 point so it doesn't matter to me.

I'm sat there looking at the pictures thinking, yeah there's something naughty going on there. Them I read that and realised that it doesn't really matter, 'cos I tough Khan got well beat.

If there was wrongdoing - then it doesn't matter how the fight went. Same as when someone goes on trial - even if they did it, you can't mess up the procedure of the trial or it doesn't count. Surely it should be the same with the scoring.

Do you think he was asking around front row for "tree fiddy"?

mrbassie wrote:Do you think he was asking around front row for "tree fiddy"?

god damn loch ness monster

@matt___s wrote:If there was wrongdoing - then it doesn't matter how the fight went. Same as when someone goes on trial - even if they did it, you can't mess up the procedure of the trial or it doesn't count. Surely it should be the same with the scoring.

Agreed this was a world title fight things have to be done by the book. You cant have some fella come along and "help out" the judges, sit in their seats, not watch the fight, do a bit of scoring when one nips to the loo. Its insane. Im suprised more people arent discusted at this - nothing to do with the outcome of the fight but the running of the sport becoming some type of amaturish joke.

earsjohn wrote:

Twinkle Toes wrote:Pretty sure that guy is the infamous: TBA

I'm not sure anyone could afford a hat that natty with a FWP purse

Allegedly.

It wasn't in the top 50 closest/most controversial decisions of the year, the one person that does need investigating is the man that scored it to Khan by five rounds - that's laughable.

All Khan did was run, flurry and foul all night. I must have been asleep when the definition of ''outboxing your opponent'' became aligned with ''boxing on the outside''.

Wasn't that bloke on the grassy knoll? Who gives a fook, Khan lost fair & square. This 'controversy' is getting ridiculous.

He's the biggest cock in the sport.

Chisora has far more to feel aggrieved about versus Helenious than this pillock.

Khan is an idiot i really hope Peterson flattens him cold in a rematch

loaded_gloves wrote:Wasn't that bloke on the grassy knoll? Who gives a fook, Khan lost fair & square. This 'controversy' is getting ridiculous.

How did khan lose fair and square if he lost by one point, when deducted 2 for pushing which is not a foul in the ABC rules so points cant be deducted? Theres something clearly going on with the judges which is against the rules and peterson was warned 15 times for leading with the head (which is a foul in the ABC rules) and not deducted a point.

Lets not get crazy Khan did pants but at absolute best peterson earned a draw. Khan outlanded peterson in almost every round. Robbery? probably not, cheeky con job is more how i would describe it.

An immediate rematch should be ordered, if peterson won fair and square he will win the rematch.

Chisora wasnt a world title holder fighting in a world title fight, id be suprised if people can think of some examples of this happening to another world title holder.

Can you post a link to the ABC rules on what constitutes a foul.

What would the mystery man have done that altered the result? ODLH checked George Hill's individual card (the one that created controversy due to a round being changed on the mastercard) and admitted there were no irregularities, and Valerie Dorsett's card hasn't been called into question once .

The IBF has also stated that their mastercard was not tampered with, and the mystery man cannot be seen harrasing any IBF official, so I'm inclined to believe them.

Jesus wept, is he ever gonna give it up? Who's fault is it going to be next week? The lad selling programmes?

dohboy wrote:Jesus wept, is he ever gonna give it up? Who's fault is it going to be next week? The lad selling programmes?

The referee, who do you think?

Please shutup Amir. Front page on world and uk news on sky. Take your lumps boy.

Whether he's right or not, I do not like some random guy being able to come in and talk to the judges during a world title fight, it only makes our sport seem shadier and more amateurishly run.

With pretty much everyone on here knowing how corrupt and boxing has been at times, I don't understand why everyone dismisses Khan's claims so easily?

Sure you can say that he's a sore loser and is just making excuses, but at the end of the day the ref was a fecking joke in that fight. Now who's to say there wasn't some home cooking outside the ring as well?

I bet boxing would be banned if all the bad stuff we DON'T know about actually came to light.

One way or another I'd like to know who that guy was. Why is he leaning over and interfering with the judge in the middle of a fight?

There is to many people who don't like Khan on here who simply dismiss his claims because of that. Yet when a fighter who isn't so controversial get's screwed there is uproar.

What a load of bollocks.

Why he can't he just accept that he lost out on the cards in a close fight and get his team to sort the rematch.

When he's got the rematch, he can set the record straight the only way that matters ie in the ring.

I really think that this is embarrassing.