Page 1 of 1
The Four Kings v the modern era
Posted: 08 Jan 2012, 13:31
by IRLangmaid25
How do you see the four kings of the 80s stacking up aganist someone of the best fighters of the last 10-15 years.
Roberto Duran
v Juan Manuel Marquez at Lightweight
v Sugar Shane Mosley at Lightweight
v Floyd Mayweather at Welterweight
v Manny Pacquiao at Welterweight
v Miguel Cotto at Welterweight
Thomas Hearns
v Paul Williams at Welterweight
v Mayweather at Welterweight
v Kelly Pavlik at Middleweight
v Martinez at Light-Middleweight and Middleweight
v Roy Jones at Light Heavyweight
v Glencoffe Johnson at Light-Heavyweight
Marvin Hagler
v Pavlik
v Sergio Martinez
v Roy Jones Jnr
v Bernard Hopkins
Sugar Ray Leonard
v Pacquiao at Welterweight
v Cotto at Welterweight
v Mayweather at Welterweight or Light-Middleweight
Any others feel free to add.
Re: The Four Kings v the modern era
Posted: 08 Jan 2012, 14:14
by dr_devious
Floyd might beat Duran at welterweight, and Jones vs Hearns at light heavy, other than that the old timers clear up imo
Re: The Four Kings v the modern era
Posted: 08 Jan 2012, 19:09
by dempseyfire
The Four Kings win every one besides Hearns-Jones Jr at 175, although I can see Hearns-Martinez at 160 as a pretty interesting fight. A peak Duran would've spanked Floyd.
Re: The Four Kings v the modern era
Posted: 08 Jan 2012, 19:41
by Goodnight, Irene
Some matches would be more competitive than others, but the only one the Kings lose is Hearns taking on Jones at LHW.
Re: The Four Kings v the modern era
Posted: 08 Jan 2012, 20:46
by SaadOffTheDeck
Agreed with the consensus, though I might take Johnson over Hearns too.
Re: The Four Kings v the modern era
Posted: 08 Jan 2012, 20:50
by Diamond WEAPON
A lot of matchups missing:
Any at MW vs:
Hopkins
Martinez
Pavlik
Jones
Toney
Any of them (save Hagler I guess) at SMW vs:
Calzaghe
Jones
Ward
Toney
Re: The Four Kings v the modern era
Posted: 09 Jan 2012, 18:03
by Bricks
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Agreed with the consensus, though I might take Johnson over Hearns too.
Explain what you see happening there........
Re: The Four Kings v the modern era
Posted: 09 Jan 2012, 21:19
by SaadOffTheDeck
Glen has a high work rate and a granite chin, very accurate with his right hand and he closes the distance well. His stamina has failed him lately, but it was once a strength. That's a very difficult fight for Hearns.
Re: The Four Kings v the modern era
Posted: 09 Jan 2012, 21:56
by dempseyfire
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Glen has a high work rate and a granite chin, very accurate with his right hand and he closes the distance well. His stamina has failed him lately, but it was once a strength. That's a very difficult fight for Hearns.
Yes, but I think Johnson has benefitted from a rather weak era at 175. I don't see Hearns not being able to do what Dawson or Tarver did in their rematches with Johnson . . box and use their range to boring decisions. But Glen could surprise.
Re: The Four Kings v the modern era
Posted: 10 Jan 2012, 11:53
by Bricks
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Glen has a high work rate and a granite chin, very accurate with his right hand and he closes the distance well. His stamina has failed him lately, but it was once a strength. That's a very difficult fight for Hearns.
Thanks for that.
The way I see it though, Dennis Andries was another tough fighter of carribean stock with those very same attributes, a granite chin, high work rate,and a pressure fighter...brutally strong... Tommy whacked him all over the place shattering his myth of durability....and Andries went on to beat Tony Willis, Bobby Cyyz, Jeff Harding and others and win the WBC title two more times.
We all have our opinions and are entitled to them thats what makes a forum a good place. I just see Tommy doing a number on Johnson..outboxing him and hurting him too.Hearns had a knack for the spectacular.... I cant see Johnson coming close to matching the intensity and work rate of Iran Barkley when they fought in 92.... and Tommy lost a razor thin decision there,fighting with one hand for 10 rounds and with a brutally busted beak.
Re: The Four Kings v the modern era
Posted: 10 Jan 2012, 11:59
by Ezzard
Hagler-Hopkins is the hardest to call, followed by Hearns-Jones and finally Duran-Mayweather.
I'd still go with the 80s fighter except perhaps I think Hopkins style might just beat Hagler. Martinez would also be a tough fight.
Re: The Four Kings v the modern era
Posted: 10 Jan 2012, 12:51
by SaadOffTheDeck
mugabi wrote:SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Glen has a high work rate and a granite chin, very accurate with his right hand and he closes the distance well. His stamina has failed him lately, but it was once a strength. That's a very difficult fight for Hearns.
Thanks for that.
The way I see it though, Dennis Andries was another tough fighter of carribean stock with those very same attributes, a granite chin, high work rate,and a pressure fighter...brutally strong... Tommy whacked him all over the place shattering his myth of durability....and Andries went on to beat Tony Willis, Bobby Cyyz, Jeff Harding and others and win the WBC title two more times.
We all have our opinions and are entitled to them thats what makes a forum a good place. I just see Tommy doing a number on Johnson..outboxing him and hurting him too.Hearns had a knack for the spectacular.... I cant see Johnson coming close to matching the intensity and work rate of Iran Barkley when they fought in 92.... and Tommy lost a razor thin decision there,fighting with one hand for 10 rounds and with a brutally busted beak.
Andries was much slower and not nearly as accurate.