BoxRec

Deserter wrote:Sorry for yet another thread around this dispute, but I felt obliged to point out the following. Basically, a big part of Mr Bunce's diatribe against Ian was that he had no right to claim to be a credible editor of a boxing website if he didn't subscribe to Allegedly channel personally. I felt at the time this betrayed a fundamental lack of understanding of how an editor can work and sure enough, in the wake of Friday's BN bill, the most comprehensive report I could find anywhere (in fact virtually the only report I could find anywhere!) was on Boxrec news courtesy of Ben Carey and Danny Wright... I hope the irony isn't lost on the big man...

MachoMan09 wrote: Quite right. Not only that, you don't have to subscribe to Allegedly channel to watch Allegedly channel. I saw (most) of Friday's bill and don't even have a Sky box.

Deserter wrote:Sorry for yet another thread around this dispute, but I felt obliged to point out the following. Basically, a big part of Mr Bunce's diatribe against Ian was that he had no right to claim to be a credible editor of a boxing website if he didn't subscribe to Allegedly channel personally. I felt at the time this betrayed a fundamental lack of understanding of how an editor can work and sure enough, in the wake of Friday's BN bill, the most comprehensive report I could find anywhere (in fact virtually the only report I could find anywhere!) was on Boxrec news courtesy of Ben Carey and Danny Wright... I hope the irony isn't lost on the big man...

Trojans44 wrote:Not sure about the misplaced pride in watching British fighters on streams. Aren't you essentially stealing money from the fighters?

milpool wrote:

Trojans44 wrote:Not sure about the misplaced pride in watching British fighters on streams. Aren't you essentially stealing money from the fighters?

It's only the same as going round to someone's house to watch it!

milpool wrote:

Trojans44 wrote:Not sure about the misplaced pride in watching British fighters on streams. Aren't you essentially stealing money from the fighters?

It's only the same as going round to someone's house to watch it!

milpool wrote:

MachoMan09 wrote: Quite right. Not only that, you don't have to subscribe to Allegedly channel to watch Allegedly channel. I saw (most) of Friday's bill and don't even have a Sky box.

Me too...I also watched Arthur Abraham on Saturday night too 8)

Trojans44 wrote:Not sure about the misplaced pride in watching British fighters on streams. Aren't you essentially stealing money from the fighters?

Wake up call wrote:

Trojans44 wrote:Not sure about the misplaced pride in watching British fighters on streams. Aren't you essentially stealing money from the fighters?

That's true when the promoter is paying the fighters.

Deserter wrote:Sorry for yet another thread around this dispute, but I felt obliged to point out the following. Basically, a big part of Mr Bunce's diatribe against Ian

T.M.K wrote:

Deserter wrote:Sorry for yet another thread around this dispute, but I felt obliged to point out the following. Basically, a big part of Mr Bunce's diatribe against Ian

Sorry to be a nuisance - obviously well out of the loop here....... but what happened?

"T.M.K"

dondada wrote:

T.M.K wrote:

Deserter wrote:Sorry for yet another thread around this dispute, but I felt obliged to point out the following. Basically, a big part of Mr Bunce's diatribe against Ian

Sorry to be a nuisance - obviously well out of the loop here....... but what happened?

"T.M.K"

On a thread titled something like 'Will you be subscribing to allegedly channel?' I posted 'No.'

Mr Bunce didn't like it. He's now on a self-imposed exile from the BoxRec forum because I am a 'twat' and a 'fool'.

dondada wrote:

T.M.K wrote:

Deserter wrote:Sorry for yet another thread around this dispute, but I felt obliged to point out the following. Basically, a big part of Mr Bunce's diatribe against Ian

Sorry to be a nuisance - obviously well out of the loop here....... but what happened?

"T.M.K"

On a thread titled something like 'Will you be subscribing to allegedly channel?' I posted 'No.'

Mr Bunce didn't like it. He's now on a self-imposed exile from the BoxRec forum because I am a 'twat' and a 'fool'.

danfoster wrote:

dondada wrote:

T.M.K wrote: Sorry to be a nuisance - obviously well out of the loop here....... but what happened?

"T.M.K"

On a thread titled something like 'Will you be subscribing to allegedly channel?' I posted 'No.'

Mr Bunce didn't like it. He's now on a self-imposed exile from the BoxRec forum because I am a 'twat' and a 'fool'.

Don't forget 'prick'.

thepocketrocket wrote:Has anyone got a link to this

Deserter wrote:Sorry for yet another thread around this dispute, but I felt obliged to point out the following. Basically, a big part of Mr Bunce's diatribe against Ian was that he had no right to claim to be a credible editor of a boxing website if he didn't subscribe to Allegedly channel personally. I felt at the time this betrayed a fundamental lack of understanding of how an editor can work and sure enough, in the wake of Friday's BN bill, the most comprehensive report I could find anywhere (in fact virtually the only report I could find anywhere!) was on Boxrec news courtesy of Ben Carey and Danny Wright... I hope the irony isn't lost on the big man...

Final round wrote:

Deserter wrote:Sorry for yet another thread around this dispute, but I felt obliged to point out the following. Basically, a big part of Mr Bunce's diatribe against Ian was that he had no right to claim to be a credible editor of a boxing website if he didn't subscribe to Allegedly channel personally. I felt at the time this betrayed a fundamental lack of understanding of how an editor can work and sure enough, in the wake of Friday's BN bill, the most comprehensive report I could find anywhere (in fact virtually the only report I could find anywhere!) was on Boxrec news courtesy of Ben Carey and Danny Wright... I hope the irony isn't lost on the big man...

An editor doesn't need to see every fight out there, sure but you'd think being an editor of a boxing news site, contributor to BM and editor of a British boxing forum he'd be watching as many fights involving British Fighters as possible. A PPV channel dedicated to showing some of our best fighters would be top of the pile for source material you'd think even if you don't like the company behind it.
I couldn't imagine (as an example) Oliver Holt not subscribing to Sky Sports because he thought Mudoch was an arsehole, he'd have fck all too talk about. unless he catches it all on a stream that is.

Final round wrote:
An editor doesn't need to see every fight out there, sure but you'd think being an editor of a boxing news site, contributor to BM and editor of a British boxing forum he'd be watching as many fights involving British Fighters as possible. A PPV channel dedicated to showing some of our best fighters would be top of the pile for source material you'd think even if you don't like the company behind it.
I couldn't imagine (as an example) Oliver Holt not subscribing to Sky Sports because he thought Mudoch was an arsehole, he'd have fck all too talk about. unless he catches it all on a stream that is.

Final round wrote:

Deserter wrote:Sorry for yet another thread around this dispute, but I felt obliged to point out the following. Basically, a big part of Mr Bunce's diatribe against Ian was that he had no right to claim to be a credible editor of a boxing website if he didn't subscribe to Allegedly channel personally. I felt at the time this betrayed a fundamental lack of understanding of how an editor can work and sure enough, in the wake of Friday's BN bill, the most comprehensive report I could find anywhere (in fact virtually the only report I could find anywhere!) was on Boxrec news courtesy of Ben Carey and Danny Wright... I hope the irony isn't lost on the big man...

An editor doesn't need to see every fight out there, sure but you'd think being an editor of a boxing news site, contributor to BM and editor of a British boxing forum he'd be watching as many fights involving British Fighters as possible. A PPV channel dedicated to showing some of our best fighters would be top of the pile for source material you'd think even if you don't like the company behind it.
I couldn't imagine (as an example) Oliver Holt not subscribing to Sky Sports because he thought Mudoch was an arsehole, he'd have fck all too talk about. unless he catches it all on a stream that is.