Page 1 of 1
mike perez
Posted: 19 Jan 2012, 16:47
by tommo100
the cuban fighting out of ireland
he looked a very decent prospect when he obliterated his prizefighter opponents
just had a look at his record and he`s been fairly inactive,is he classed as one of
"i don`t need him" brigade,he did look very useful indeed
Re: mike perez
Posted: 19 Jan 2012, 16:56
by loaded_gloves
His weight fluctuates wildly. I don't trust a guy like that, particularly in this era of fat lazy heavies. He was nearly 18 stone for a recent fight. He won't go far.
Remember when Tyson was in perfect shape every time and splattering his opponents in cartoon violence style? We won't see that again.
Re: mike perez
Posted: 19 Jan 2012, 17:42
by funso banjo baby
hes better than solis
ive said that from day one
too short and fat to worry the elite though
Re: mike perez
Posted: 20 Jan 2012, 02:43
by jessi
funso banjo baby wrote:hes better than solis
ive said that from day one
too short and fat to worry the elite though
I don't believe his better then solis
Re: mike perez
Posted: 20 Jan 2012, 06:49
by loaded_gloves
I don't think height is any problem. I think a peak Tyson or Frazier would smoke the Klitschkos on the same night.
Perez is just another fat disinterested heavyweight and by that defenition is obviously going to underachieve. Solis looked a more technically acomplished boxer but was so fat he imploded on his big night.
Re: mike perez
Posted: 20 Jan 2012, 08:11
by whiskey