ESPN's Top-10 HWs (Panel Discussion)...
Posted: 25 Jan 2012, 05:23
I have this on DVD, and decided to give it a watch for the first time in about two years. Its a panel discussion hosted by Brian Kenny, and involving Bert Sugar, Larry Holmes, Teddy Atlas, Jerry Izenberg, and George Chuvalo.
What does everyone think of Sugar's list?
1. Joe Louis
2. Muhammad Ali
3. Jack Dempsey
4. Jack Johnson
5. Rocky Marciano
6. Gene Tunney
7. Ezzard Charles
8. George Foreman
9. Joe Frazier
10. Larry Holmes
I think the list is mostly pretty terrible. Sugar also explained he had Evander Holyfield at #11, Jim Jeffries and Mike Tyson around 15, and Lennox Lewis way back at 19. He does not mention Sonny Liston at all.
Gotta say, too, that Holmes was his typical appalling self. His venom toward Foreman knows no bounds, citing his bouts with Briggs, Schultz and Morrison as reasons the prime Foreman couldnt beat him, and completely diminishing the wins over Moorer and Frazier (both are better than any of Holmes' wins). Of course he rated himself at #1, without a hint of humour.
Chuvalo, on the other hand, was a pleasure, and is sharp as a tack. The panel agreed --- save for Sugar --- that Ali would be too good for Louis head-to-head.
I gotta give this list a big thumbs-down. Marciano and Johnson in the top-5, Charles (who is indeed under-rated at Heavy, but cmon) and Tunney ahead of Foreman and Holmes? NO mention of Liston at all?
What does everyone think of Sugar's list?
1. Joe Louis
2. Muhammad Ali
3. Jack Dempsey
4. Jack Johnson
5. Rocky Marciano
6. Gene Tunney
7. Ezzard Charles
8. George Foreman
9. Joe Frazier
10. Larry Holmes
I think the list is mostly pretty terrible. Sugar also explained he had Evander Holyfield at #11, Jim Jeffries and Mike Tyson around 15, and Lennox Lewis way back at 19. He does not mention Sonny Liston at all.
Gotta say, too, that Holmes was his typical appalling self. His venom toward Foreman knows no bounds, citing his bouts with Briggs, Schultz and Morrison as reasons the prime Foreman couldnt beat him, and completely diminishing the wins over Moorer and Frazier (both are better than any of Holmes' wins). Of course he rated himself at #1, without a hint of humour.
Chuvalo, on the other hand, was a pleasure, and is sharp as a tack. The panel agreed --- save for Sugar --- that Ali would be too good for Louis head-to-head.
I gotta give this list a big thumbs-down. Marciano and Johnson in the top-5, Charles (who is indeed under-rated at Heavy, but cmon) and Tunney ahead of Foreman and Holmes? NO mention of Liston at all?