Firpo v Cooney
Posted: 25 Jan 2012, 16:39
What are the baord's thoughts?
dempseyfire wrote:Cooney has more skills but give me the guy with the better chin in this one. Firpo TKO 2. IMO Cooney had one of the worse chins of the 80s . .
His fight with Holmes proved he never had a reliable chin, prime or otherwise. He made Holmes look like Tyson at timesAngryGoon38 wrote:dempseyfire wrote:Cooney has more skills but give me the guy with the better chin in this one. Firpo TKO 2. IMO Cooney had one of the worse chins of the 80s . .
Only after he was shot. I say prime Cooney takes it in the 5th.
Dempsey was ten times as durable as Cooney based on what exactly? Cooney was ko'd by Holmes, Spinks and Foreman. None of these guys were exactly light hitters. i wouldnt be suprised if all three, including Spinks, hit harder than anyone Dempsey ever fought.Goodnight, Irene wrote:His fight with Holmes proved he never had a reliable chin, prime or otherwise. He made Holmes look like Tyson at timesAngryGoon38 wrote:dempseyfire wrote:Cooney has more skills but give me the guy with the better chin in this one. Firpo TKO 2. IMO Cooney had one of the worse chins of the 80s . .
Only after he was shot. I say prime Cooney takes it in the 5th.D
Firpo would definitely have his chances. He wounded Dempsey (briefly, but legitimately), who was ten times as durable as Cooney.
Same guys have Dempsey whacking out Frazier early, haha.theone wrote:Dempsey was ten times as durable as Cooney based on what exactly? Cooney was ko'd by Holmes, Spinks and Foreman. None of these guys were exactly light hitters. i wouldnt be suprised if all three, including Spinks, hit harder than anyone Dempsey ever fought.Goodnight, Irene wrote:His fight with Holmes proved he never had a reliable chin, prime or otherwise. He made Holmes look like Tyson at timesAngryGoon38 wrote:
Only after he was shot. I say prime Cooney takes it in the 5th.D
Firpo would definitely have his chances. He wounded Dempsey (briefly, but legitimately), who was ten times as durable as Cooney.
Carpantier, Brennan and Sharkey staggered Dempsey badly, none of those guys hit anywhere near as hard as the three that stopped Cooney. Now before anyone pitches a fit, I'm not saying Cooney beats Dempsey; but to say Dempsey is vastly more durable than Cooney is basing it solely on the mythology that has grown around the Manassa Mauler. The fact that some on this site think Dempsey could have stood toe to toe with Tyson is mindbogglingly.
Definitely another eye roller.yancey wrote:Same guys have Dempsey whacking out Frazier early, haha.theone wrote:Dempsey was ten times as durable as Cooney based on what exactly? Cooney was ko'd by Holmes, Spinks and Foreman. None of these guys were exactly light hitters. i wouldnt be suprised if all three, including Spinks, hit harder than anyone Dempsey ever fought.Goodnight, Irene wrote: His fight with Holmes proved he never had a reliable chin, prime or otherwise. He made Holmes look like Tyson at timesD
Firpo would definitely have his chances. He wounded Dempsey (briefly, but legitimately), who was ten times as durable as Cooney.
Carpantier, Brennan and Sharkey staggered Dempsey badly, none of those guys hit anywhere near as hard as the three that stopped Cooney. Now before anyone pitches a fit, I'm not saying Cooney beats Dempsey; but to say Dempsey is vastly more durable than Cooney is basing it solely on the mythology that has grown around the Manassa Mauler. The fact that some on this site think Dempsey could have stood toe to toe with Tyson is mindbogglingly.
theone wrote:Dempsey was ten times as durable as Cooney based on what exactly? Cooney was ko'd by Holmes, Spinks and Foreman. None of these guys were exactly light hitters. i wouldnt be suprised if all three, including Spinks, hit harder than anyone Dempsey ever fought.Goodnight, Irene wrote:His fight with Holmes proved he never had a reliable chin, prime or otherwise. He made Holmes look like Tyson at timesAngryGoon38 wrote:
Only after he was shot. I say prime Cooney takes it in the 5th.D
Firpo would definitely have his chances. He wounded Dempsey (briefly, but legitimately), who was ten times as durable as Cooney.
Carpantier, Brennan and Sharkey staggered Dempsey badly, none of those guys hit anywhere near as hard as the three that stopped Cooney. Now before anyone pitches a fit, I'm not saying Cooney beats Dempsey; but to say Dempsey is vastly more durable than Cooney is basing it solely on the mythology that has grown around the Manassa Mauler. The fact that some on this site think Dempsey could have stood toe to toe with Tyson is mindbogglingly.
Goodnight, Irene wrote:I know what Tyson would say to those whod bank on him to crush Dempsey...
Willard and Firpo power advantage came from their relatively large size in their era. Holmes and heavyweight Spinks both would have been huge, powerful men in Willard and Firpo's time and would have had even more impressive ko's than those two 'giants". You really think those two would have been considered as powerful in Holmes and Spinks era? i don't think so.Goodnight, Irene wrote:Spinks (at Heavy) and Holmes could punch? They could punch harder than Willard, or Firpo? Pure fantasy.
Holmes turned a totally fresh Cooney into bambi on ice with ONE PUNCH in round two. If that isnt the mark of a glass jaw, I dont know what is. Holmes doesnt even appear to commit completely to the punch, yet Cooney reacts as if struck by lightning.
And dont forget Otto put him down with one shot in The SimpsonsD
...mindbogglingly mindboggling.BoxBuzz wrote:theone wrote:Dempsey was ten times as durable as Cooney based on what exactly? Cooney was ko'd by Holmes, Spinks and Foreman. None of these guys were exactly light hitters. i wouldnt be suprised if all three, including Spinks, hit harder than anyone Dempsey ever fought.Goodnight, Irene wrote: His fight with Holmes proved he never had a reliable chin, prime or otherwise. He made Holmes look like Tyson at timesD
Firpo would definitely have his chances. He wounded Dempsey (briefly, but legitimately), who was ten times as durable as Cooney.
Carpantier, Brennan and Sharkey staggered Dempsey badly, none of those guys hit anywhere near as hard as the three that stopped Cooney. Now before anyone pitches a fit, I'm not saying Cooney beats Dempsey; but to say Dempsey is vastly more durable than Cooney is basing it solely on the mythology that has grown around the Manassa Mauler. The fact that some on this site think Dempsey could have stood toe to toe with Tyson is mindbogglingly.
yes....yes....? mindbogglingly..........please go on....
Spinks isnt a big Heavy in 1985, 1885, or anywhere in between --- and neither he nor Holmes punched with anywhere near Willard or Firpo's force.theone wrote:Willard and Firpo power advantage came from their relatively large size in their era. Holmes and heavyweight Spinks both would have been huge, powerful men in Willard and Firpo's time and would have had even more impressive ko's than those two 'giants". You really think those two would have been considered as powerful in Holmes and Spinks era? i don't think so.Goodnight, Irene wrote:Spinks (at Heavy) and Holmes could punch? They could punch harder than Willard, or Firpo? Pure fantasy.
Holmes turned a totally fresh Cooney into bambi on ice with ONE PUNCH in round two. If that isnt the mark of a glass jaw, I dont know what is. Holmes doesnt even appear to commit completely to the punch, yet Cooney reacts as if struck by lightning.
And dont forget Otto put him down with one shot in The SimpsonsD
Goodnight, Irene wrote:Yance,
I dont believe thats the case in this one. Tyson WORSHIPPED Dempsey. I think Tyson would sincerely have his doubts.