BoxRec

rhino222 wrote:Its b0llocks, thats what it is, big hairy rip off b0llocks.

ShadrachSimmo wrote:

rhino222 wrote:Its b0llocks, thats what it is, big hairy rip off b0llocks.

You put it better then Wordsworth my good man. It's goin under shortly i think.

rhino222 wrote:somebody needs their arse kicking. whoever organises the schedule needs shooting with their own sh1t.

i dont give a dam if they cant pay them the same as tv companies, they should have thought about that before they started the effin channel.

we need probably 4 live shows a week, 2 from home and 2 from abroad, one of the home ones can be 'small hall'.

we need something like a 'thursday feature night' with an hour documentary/career summary about a famous fighter.

we need bunces boxing hour once weekly, about ALL boxing and not just Allegedly channel.

we need at least 2 shows per week that are coverage of old boxing shows.

we need it on BT Vision.

we need it cheaper for access via the internet.

we need the weigh in for big bills to be on live.

we need cross table Q&A sessions from boxers past and present.

Right you Allegedly channel muppets, ive given you your blue print to survive, take my advice or your channel will fold by August 2012.

PM me if you want to employ me for anymore advice, this message is all i am doing for free!!

magnus wrote:

rhino222 wrote:somebody needs their arse kicking. whoever organises the schedule needs shooting with their own sh1t.

i dont give a dam if they cant pay them the same as tv companies, they should have thought about that before they started the effin channel.

we need probably 4 live shows a week, 2 from home and 2 from abroad, one of the home ones can be 'small hall'.

we need something like a 'thursday feature night' with an hour documentary/career summary about a famous fighter.

we need bunces boxing hour once weekly, about ALL boxing and not just Allegedly channel.

we need at least 2 shows per week that are coverage of old boxing shows.

we need it on BT Vision.

we need it cheaper for access via the internet.

we need the weigh in for big bills to be on live.

we need cross table Q&A sessions from boxers past and present.

Right you Allegedly channel muppets, ive given you your blue print to survive, take my advice or your channel will fold by August 2012.

PM me if you want to employ me for anymore advice, this message is all i am doing for free!!

Sounds good to me, but...

They need a lot more subscribers/investors to pay for all that!

iamasadlittleboy wrote:Why do Steve and Steve talk as if the options were only big American stars or Karpency?
Why not mention the likes of Sillahk (yeah baby...), Bellew (rematch), Garcia (maybe a little unknown but very good Cuban), Kovalev (hard punching Russian) or even mention Chilemba as a future possibility?

rhino222 wrote:the key to the stations survival is to make it available for internet viewers, 4 quid a month, or 5...and im in like flynn, im sure thousands of others would be too!

revporl wrote:Theu have Burns, Groves, Cleverly and some good overseas fights. It's not bad for £10 p/m really. And it's better, Brook/Hatton aside, than this http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,12947,00.html

I think people are overly negative cos of who is running it.

Having said that, I haven't subscribed cos of the upfront cost, I'm not sure that it will last 6 months!

littlekinny wrote:Its really not as bad as a lot of people on here make out.
Fair enough they havent had the greatest bills of late but there have some decent scraps.
As someone above eluded to, I think a lot of the hate comes due to who is behind it.
At the end of the day its £10 which though it may sound expensive (and could well be overpriced) is not a massive amount to watch a channel that is devoted to a sport that you are willing to make literally thousands of posts on a forum about.

These days £10 doesnt get you much (and I appreciate some people may not have that kind of disposable income in these times) but a tenner will get you
3 or 4 pints down the pub
a pack of fags, bag of crisps, can of pop and choccy bar
2 mcdonalds meals
christ, subscription to Graham Houstons site is $20 a month.

On top of that there are shows that could easily have been ppv (not that they deserve to be) and people would have forked out £15.

All Im saying is for less that £2.50 a week its not that bad.

Now for the flame throwers from all angles:)

rhino222 wrote:somebody needs their arse kicking. whoever organises the schedule needs shooting with their own sh1t.

i dont give a dam if they cant pay them the same as tv companies, they should have thought about that before they started the effin channel.

we need probably 4 live shows a week, 2 from home and 2 from abroad, one of the home ones can be 'small hall'.

we need something like a 'thursday feature night' with an hour documentary/career summary about a famous fighter.

we need bunces boxing hour once weekly, about ALL boxing and not just Allegedly channel.

we need at least 2 shows per week that are coverage of old boxing shows.

we need it on BT Vision.

we need it cheaper for access via the internet.

we need the weigh in for big bills to be on live.

we need cross table Q&A sessions from boxers past and present.

Right you Allegedly channel muppets, ive given you your blue print to survive, take my advice or your channel will fold by August 2012.

PM me if you want to employ me for anymore advice, this message is all i am doing for free!!