Re: Blake caparello v Kevin engel
Posted: 08 Feb 2012, 01:05
Thats great news all the best to you Blake and his team. 
Brute wrote:He beat Daryl Cunningham, not Steve.
A mismatch? How? Blake is 10-0-1 against domestic Australian competition. Engel 18-5 (15KO) and has fought on Showtime and ESPN. Well done to Blake's team, it'll be a top fight. I believe Baff is injured anyway.Alexey Uralets wrote:Missmatch, Blake will KO Engel, imho. But for Blake's debut in US (if this fight will happen in US) this is right opponent.
But Blake vs Baff is much interesting for me though.
Agreed but he's faced far superior competition than Blake at this point in time.Brute wrote:Engel won his first 13 fights, his last 11 have not been as stellar.
...and most of the good ones have beaten him.Ipswich Express wrote:Agreed but he's faced far superior competition than Blake at this point in time.Brute wrote:Engel won his first 13 fights, his last 11 have not been as stellar.
Daryl Cunningham is better than anyone Blake has faced so far and Engel's beaten him. It's about as far from a mismatch as you can get. It's the perfect opponent for Blake to put his toe in the water in relation to American opponents.Brute wrote:...and most of the good ones have beaten him.Ipswich Express wrote:Agreed but he's faced far superior competition than Blake at this point in time.Brute wrote:Engel won his first 13 fights, his last 11 have not been as stellar.
He beat Cunningham in 2007. Have a look at some of the nobodies who have beaten Engel since then.Ipswich Express wrote:Daryl Cunningham is better than anyone Blake has faced so far and Engel's beaten him. It's about as far from a mismatch as you can get. It's the perfect opponent for Blake to put his toe in the water in relation to American opponents.Brute wrote:...and most of the good ones have beaten him.Ipswich Express wrote: Agreed but he's faced far superior competition than Blake at this point in time.
Nobodies? I can only presume you don't follow US boxing that closely. Most of those guys are among the better prospects at the moment. The exception would be Mike Word, which he avenged next fight.Brute wrote:He beat Cunningham in 2007. Have a look at some of the nobodies who have beaten Engel since then.Ipswich Express wrote:Daryl Cunningham is better than anyone Blake has faced so far and Engel's beaten him. It's about as far from a mismatch as you can get. It's the perfect opponent for Blake to put his toe in the water in relation to American opponents.Brute wrote: ...and most of the good ones have beaten him.
Huh? How long ago was what? If you're trying to tell me that an American who's 18-5 with 15KO's and has been fighting on ESPN and Showtime isn't a good opponent for an Aussie prospect who's 10-0-1, then you've lost me. Sure Engel's lost to some good fighters, nobody is calling him the second coming of Harry Greb.Brute wrote:How long ago was that? Five years before Tony Mundine beat him Emile Griffith was World Middleweight Champion. When he fought Mundine he was making up the numbers. Engel has never been a champion.
A couple of those fights were taken on short notice and like I said, were against some of the better prospects going around. Engel's had plenty of time to prepare for this fight. It'll be competitive. Well done to Blake's team for taking it - definitely a step in the right direction.Brute wrote:His recent form is pretty poor, he has been stopped in three of his last four fights. The win was against a debutant.
Ipswich Express wrote:Huh? How long ago was what? If you're trying to tell me that an American who's 18-5 with 15KO's and has been fighting on ESPN and Showtime isn't a good opponent for an Aussie prospect who's 10-0-1, then you've lost me. Sure Engel's lost to some good fighters, nobody is calling him the second coming of Harry Greb.Brute wrote:How long ago was that? Five years before Tony Mundine beat him Emile Griffith was World Middleweight Champion. When he fought Mundine he was making up the numbers. Engel has never been a champion.
He would have had a hell of a time in Tasmania.caveman wrote:still ,a win is a win
I think it shows just how good Blake can potentially be. Like I said, he was a step up and Blake raised his game. Well done to him.Brute wrote:Ipswich Express wrote:Huh? How long ago was what? If you're trying to tell me that an American who's 18-5 with 15KO's and has been fighting on ESPN and Showtime isn't a good opponent for an Aussie prospect who's 10-0-1, then you've lost me. Sure Engel's lost to some good fighters, nobody is calling him the second coming of Harry Greb.Brute wrote:How long ago was that? Five years before Tony Mundine beat him Emile Griffith was World Middleweight Champion. When he fought Mundine he was making up the numbers. Engel has never been a champion.
What do you think now? Caparello 100-91, 100-90, 100-89. Engel did not win a round.