Page 1 of 1
Munroe v Quigg made mandatory
Posted: 10 Feb 2012, 14:26
by Shambles
Apologies if this has already been mentioned but Rendall has posted this news on facebook. I can't wait for this fight if it goes ahead. Both are talented and believe they can win world honours eventually. What are your thoughts? For me, it's too close to call
Re: Munroe v Quigg made mandatory
Posted: 10 Feb 2012, 14:44
by canonball1234
Rendal stops qigg in my opinion! different league off boxing
Re: Munroe v Quigg made mandatory
Posted: 10 Feb 2012, 15:22
by TheCobra
Can't see it happening the way Rendall was talking he wants world shots and things, can't see Hatton wanting to damage either of their men.
Re: Munroe v Quigg made mandatory
Posted: 10 Feb 2012, 15:23
by tear up
iv alway s thought hatton s had monroe on there team for quigg and him meet for the british and it roll s into an eliminator for world honours as monroe and quigg so high in the ratein so let the best man win

Re: Munroe v Quigg made mandatory
Posted: 10 Feb 2012, 15:23
by Dan Dares
Great if it happens - no reason why it shouldn't if both boxers want it.
Re: Munroe v Quigg made mandatory
Posted: 10 Feb 2012, 15:31
by tear up
Dan Dares wrote:Great if it happens - no reason why it shouldn't if both boxers want it.
they both fighter s who want to go the top quigg high up in the ibf and after the 2 african s fight each other sure hatton can get either man the world title fight but sure they ll have it out to see who s next in line and no 1 till frampton comes up to the table

Re: Munroe v Quigg made mandatory
Posted: 10 Feb 2012, 17:14
by TheCobra
tear up wrote:Dan Dares wrote:Great if it happens - no reason why it shouldn't if both boxers want it.
they both fighter s who want to go the top quigg high up in the ibf and after the 2 african s fight each other sure hatton can get either man the world title fight but sure they ll have it out to see who s next in line and no 1 till frampton comes up to the table

Think about it from Hatton's point of view, if he puts Munroe vs Quigg and then serves the winner to Frampton and Framtpon wins. Well that's 2 Hatton fighters who are damaged goods. I don't think they are gona do that.
Re: Munroe v Quigg made mandatory
Posted: 10 Feb 2012, 18:35
by Crazyboy
I'm pretty sure hatton was saying on ringside that is was a possibility that this fight could happen.
Re: Munroe v Quigg made mandatory
Posted: 11 Feb 2012, 05:20
by tear up
TheCobra wrote:tear up wrote:Dan Dares wrote:Great if it happens - no reason why it shouldn't if both boxers want it.
they both fighter s who want to go the top quigg high up in the ibf and after the 2 african s fight each other sure hatton can get either man the world title fight but sure they ll have it out to see who s next in line and no 1 till frampton comes up to the table

Think about it from Hatton's point of view, if he puts Munroe vs Quigg and then serves the winner to Frampton and Framtpon wins. Well that's 2 Hatton fighters who are damaged goods. I don't think they are gona do that.
didnt mean it that way meant that monroe v quigg for british and eliminator for world honours and winner moves on to world honours without fightin frampton

the loser will b fed to frampton

Re: Munroe v Quigg made mandatory
Posted: 11 Feb 2012, 10:36
by mrblockmcphilbin
be a good fight but think munroe might be bit much at this point for quigg
Re: Munroe v Quigg made mandatory
Posted: 11 Feb 2012, 13:24
by tear up
mrblockmcphilbin wrote:be a good fight but think munroe might be bit much at this point for quigg
i just cant see why the hatton s wanted him and stole him from frank maloney its for a reason and im thinkin for quigg to beat him in a final eliminator

i dont and never have rated monroe sorry mate

Re: Munroe v Quigg made mandatory
Posted: 12 Feb 2012, 07:46
by mrblockmcphilbin
tear up wrote:mrblockmcphilbin wrote:be a good fight but think munroe might be bit much at this point for quigg
i just cant see why the hatton s wanted him and stole him from frank maloney its for a reason and im thinkin for quigg to beat him in a final eliminator

i dont and never have rated monroe sorry mate

dont get me wrong quigg is a class fighter i jus think he not ready for munroe yet think he be little to much at the moment
Re: Munroe v Quigg made mandatory
Posted: 12 Feb 2012, 10:49
by tear up
mrblockmcphilbin wrote:tear up wrote:mrblockmcphilbin wrote:be a good fight but think munroe might be bit much at this point for quigg
i just cant see why the hatton s wanted him and stole him from frank maloney its for a reason and im thinkin for quigg to beat him in a final eliminator

i dont and never have rated monroe sorry mate

dont get me wrong quigg is a class fighter i jus think he not ready for munroe yet think he be little to much at the moment
only time will tell there monroe for me is mad leavin maloney he was his star boy he s went with hatton false promises i think now he s had what is it 2 crap fight what he hasn t looked good in at least maloney got him fighter s were he looked good against

Re: Munroe v Quigg made mandatory
Posted: 12 Feb 2012, 12:08
by xrgcx
Quigg wins in a cracking fight. Hope it happens, but like most people have my doubts. Would be good to get Quigg, Munroe, Frampton, Simpson, Booth, Ryan Walsh in a super 6 format. It of course won't happen because certain guys are at different levels but would be interesting.
Re: Munroe v Quigg made mandatory
Posted: 12 Feb 2012, 18:08
by Final round
A real challenge for Quigg, Munroe's a high output proven 12 rnd fighter with a great engine who's fought at a far higher level, a bit more power wouldn't go amiss and Quigg 'may' edge him on that one but Munroe's proven he can take a bit of a pasting as he showed against Nishioka. So I think he'd overcome Quigg at this stage, a bit too early for me. A proper fight though.