Page 1 of 1
allegedly Presenters
Posted: 10 Mar 2012, 22:20
by 15829
Possibly the worst duo they could of put together the giant and duke surely andy kerr, richard keys or paul dempsey could of been brought in to present and any allegedly fighter based in london could of come in to be the analyst, dont get me wrong am made up there showing the fight just could of done without ronald and duke
Re: Allegedly channel Presenters
Posted: 11 Mar 2012, 05:04
by Khaosai-Galaxy
They are not still using Duke McKenzie as a pundit are they?
He talks like a bloody stroke victim.
Was it heavy on the garbled metaphors again last night?
Re: Allegedly channel Presenters
Posted: 11 Mar 2012, 05:34
by orbtastic
You need to work on your presentation a little, diggler.
Re: Allegedly channel Presenters
Posted: 11 Mar 2012, 05:54
by dan28uk
does paul dempsey actually work for allegedly channel iv never seen him on there, bunce does my head in a bit hes too outspoken.
Re: Allegedly channel Presenters
Posted: 11 Mar 2012, 11:37
by MightyWarrior
Was it Barry Jones commentating on the Burns fight ? He's excellent, and the Scotish guy calling the fight was very good too. They definitely need to use Jones more, another great find by the BN crew.
Duke and Ronald was a pretty weird combo, had to fast forward though that - Duke looks like he's about to fall asleep half the time.
Re: Allegedly channel Presenters
Posted: 13 Mar 2012, 11:12
by peter1948
Talking about putting short people on boxes so that they measure up to others.
They say that Willie Carson used to be on a box standing next to Clare Balding whilst giving his views on horse racing, to which he was very good at.
Re: Allegedly channel Presenters
Posted: 13 Mar 2012, 11:29
by iamasadlittleboy
MightyWarrior wrote:Was it Barry Jones commentating on the Burns fight ? He's excellent, and the Scotish guy calling the fight was very good too. They definitely need to use Jones more, another great find by the BN crew.
Duke and Ronald was a pretty weird combo, had to fast forward though that - Duke looks like he's about to fall asleep half the time.
The Welsh guy was really good kudos to him
What happened to the "host" they had in the early shows? (the guy who used to do Setanta) he was a great host.
Re: Allegedly channel Presenters
Posted: 13 Mar 2012, 14:19
by reggaereggae
Khaosai-Galaxy wrote:They are not still using Duke McKenzie as a pundit are they?
He talks like a bloody stroke victim.
Was it heavy on the garbled metaphors again last night?
I thought it was a practical joke. The worst combo I've ever seen on any sport. Ronald macdonut is so poor. Together it is like listening to 2 morons in a school for retarded kids, jabbering with some of the least insightful 'commentary' ever. Ronalds Tongue seems to be too big got his mouth and is in the running for the ugliest man on TV with a permanent shit-eating grin on his stupid face. Duke is hardly the sharpest tool in the box either, and is bearable (just) with someone to take the lead, but this was so poor it was comedic.
Me thinks 'diversity' quota got these idiots the job, there are mutton who could speak more insightfully
Re: Allegedly channel Presenters
Posted: 13 Mar 2012, 14:27
by Datsue
reggaereggae wrote:Khaosai-Galaxy wrote:They are not still using Duke McKenzie as a pundit are they?
He talks like a bloody stroke victim.
Was it heavy on the garbled metaphors again last night?
I thought it was a practical joke. The worst combo I've ever seen on any sport. Ronald macdonut is so poor. Together it is like listening to 2 morons in a school for retarded kids, jabbering with some of the least insightful 'commentary' ever. Ronalds Tongue seems to be too big got his mouth and is in the running for the ugliest man on TV with a permanent shit-eating grin on his stupid face. Duke is hardly the sharpest tool in the box either, and is bearable (just) with someone to take the lead, but this was so poor it was comedic.
Me thinks 'diversity' quota got these idiots the job, there are mutton who could speak more insightfully
O/T: Why aren't you called "A low-rent Malthus" any more? That used to make me smile...
Re: Allegedly channel Presenters
Posted: 13 Mar 2012, 14:37
by iamasadlittleboy
I prefer Ron to John Rawling...though that's not saying a lot...
Re: Allegedly channel Presenters
Posted: 13 Mar 2012, 16:00
by Glyn Leach
reggaereggae wrote:Khaosai-Galaxy wrote:They are not still using Duke McKenzie as a pundit are they?
He talks like a bloody stroke victim.
Was it heavy on the garbled metaphors again last night?
I thought it was a practical joke. The worst combo I've ever seen on any sport. Ronald macdonut is so poor. Together it is like listening to 2 morons in a school for retarded kids, jabbering with some of the least insightful 'commentary' ever. Ronalds Tongue seems to be too big got his mouth and is in the running for the ugliest man on TV with a permanent shit-eating grin on his stupid face. Duke is hardly the sharpest tool in the box either, and is bearable (just) with someone to take the lead, but this was so poor it was comedic.
Me thinks 'diversity' quota got these idiots the job, there are mutton who could speak more insightfully
A hall of fame post if ever I read one!

Re: Allegedly channel Presenters
Posted: 13 Mar 2012, 16:07
by reggaereggae
iamasadlittleboy wrote:I prefer Ron to John Rawling...though that's not saying a lot...
Hahhahhaha yes; I prefer Ron to 3 week old human faeces; but that's not saying too much either!
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Re: Allegedly channel Presenters
Posted: 14 Mar 2012, 12:38
by whiskey
McKenzie is dog sh*t on the mic.
I watched Bute vs Johnson and he repeated himself again and again and again....
"please stfu Duke !! Jesus Christ !! "
My mrs ran in and said what's up?
"that tw*t commentating is ruining the fight"
"Jim Watt again?" she said

Re: Allegedly channel Presenters
Posted: 14 Mar 2012, 16:01
by dondada
My favourite Duke one (and I like Duke very much, actually, though not really as a commentator) is - "I thought Froch won that round. But because we're in Denmark, I've scored it even."

Re: Allegedly channel Presenters
Posted: 14 Mar 2012, 18:39
by Final round
Re: Allegedly channel Presenters
Posted: 14 Mar 2012, 19:23
by rhino222
reggaereggae wrote:iamasadlittleboy wrote:I prefer Ron to John Rawling...though that's not saying a lot...
Hahhahhaha yes; I prefer Ron to 3 week old human faeces; but that's not saying too much either!
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
i once went up to john rawling at the froch dirrel weigh in in nottingham city centre, i said 'are you john rawling' 'yes' he said proudly, so i promptly gave him my camera to take a picture of myself and tyson fury.
the look on his face was a classic and one of my finest hours.......

Re: Allegedly channel Presenters
Posted: 15 Mar 2012, 19:07
by Bricks
MachoMan09 wrote:reggaereggae wrote:Khaosai-Galaxy wrote:They are not still using Duke McKenzie as a pundit are they?
He talks like a bloody stroke victim.
Was it heavy on the garbled metaphors again last night?
I thought it was a practical joke. The worst combo I've ever seen on any sport. Ronald macdonut is so poor. Together it is like listening to 2 morons in a school for retarded kids, jabbering with some of the least insightful 'commentary' ever. Ronalds Tongue seems to be too big got his mouth and is in the running for the ugliest man on TV with a permanent shit-eating grin on his stupid face. Duke is hardly the sharpest tool in the box either, and is bearable (just) with someone to take the lead, but this was so poor it was comedic.
Me thinks 'diversity' quota got these idiots the job, there are mutton who could speak more insightfully
Ron is a very good all rounder, I don't see what your problem is. Boxing, athletics, tennis, basketball, etc... he's a lot more capable than most and has a wide knowledge base.
have to agree i like ron and Duke is a excellent colour commentator really knows how to comment on a fight after Jim watt goes he will be the best in britain at that role sensing a shift in a fight