Page 1 of 3
Eddie Hearn - all style no substance...
Posted: 15 Apr 2012, 03:38
by jizzle
I know that a lot of you are wedged up Eddie's rear but what do people think of the forthcoming Froch show?
I'm going up for it, tickets are f**king expensive (which I don't mind) but the undercard for an international World title fight is an absolute joke...
I think a European fight or a World eliminator should be a minimum chief support...
For me, he's just going for the fleece...
Re: Eddie Hearn - all style no substance...
Posted: 15 Apr 2012, 03:49
by TheCobra
jizzle wrote:I know that a lot of you are wedged up Eddie's rear but what do people think of the forthcoming Froch show?
I'm going up for it, tickets are f**king expensive (which I don't mind) but the undercard for an international World title fight is an absolute joke...
I think a European fight or a World eliminator should be a minimum chief support...
For me, he's just going for the fleece...
They've probably spent a shedload getting Bute over and got no money left for a decent undercard. I agree it needs to be stronger as they have priced the fight pretty keenly.
Re: Eddie Hearn - all style no substance...
Posted: 15 Apr 2012, 03:57
by Adamj1987
Deff needs to be stronger but they are busing in one of butes stablemates. Hopefully a few brit title fights will be made for it such as voluntary defences.
I vote a 3rd aul david - tyrone wright fight

Re: Eddie Hearn - all style no substance...
Posted: 15 Apr 2012, 04:38
by Wrists
Getting Bute over here is a real coup - and also an expensive one so you can forgive the less than stellar undercard.
I like Hearn, he puts on good shows and doesn't seem to get involved in spouting bullshit.
Re: Eddie Hearn - all style no substance...
Posted: 15 Apr 2012, 05:23
by danfoster
It might not be a case of Hearn being tight - i'm sure Froch has got a lot of say about the budget for the undercard.
Re: Eddie Hearn - all style no substance...
Posted: 15 Apr 2012, 05:29
by mcato
danfoster wrote:It might not be a case of Hearn being tight - i'm sure Froch has got a lot of say about the budget for the undercard.
Lets be real how many times to we get the top I mean top fighters to this country with Showtime and HBO paying the big MONEY. I say well done to E Hearn the fight tickets were sold out based upon this fight not the undercards. Big Time boxing has come to Britain well done Hearns.........or would you perfer audley vs haye?
Re: Eddie Hearn - all style no substance...
Posted: 15 Apr 2012, 06:46
by Scottrf
Was obvious in an undersized arena. Bought my ticket for the main event. Don't remember great Froch undercards under Hennessy? Not sure this said much about Hearn.
Re: Eddie Hearn - all style no substance...
Posted: 15 Apr 2012, 06:57
by twenty six
That's right all style no substance
Not a businessman, should put on a massive undercard make a stonking loss and say I did it for you
It's a sell out regardless of the undercard.
I shudder to think how much the debit column is for Matchroom to put this on.
If they break even - what a result.
Re: Eddie Hearn - all style no substance...
Posted: 15 Apr 2012, 07:13
by leforge
Purdy v Vassell 2 should be on this undercard.
Re: Eddie Hearn - all style no substance...
Posted: 15 Apr 2012, 07:21
by jizzle
twenty six wrote:That's right all style no substance
Not a businessman, should put on a massive undercard make a stonking loss and say I did it for you
It's a sell out regardless of the undercard.
I shudder to think how much the debit column is for Matchroom to put this on.
If they break even - what a result.
Did I suggest make a loss? No. Any businessman deals with value for money.
Re: Eddie Hearn - all style no substance...
Posted: 15 Apr 2012, 07:38
by Scottrf
jizzle wrote:twenty six wrote:That's right all style no substance
Not a businessman, should put on a massive undercard make a stonking loss and say I did it for you
It's a sell out regardless of the undercard.
I shudder to think how much the debit column is for Matchroom to put this on.
If they break even - what a result.
Did I suggest make a loss? No. Any businessman deals with value for money.
Well, you did, just not directly. Any more he spends on the undercard is a loss.
Re: Eddie Hearn - all style no substance...
Posted: 15 Apr 2012, 07:41
by Camcas
I'd go for just the Froch V Bute fight, some boxing fans are just never happy
Re: Eddie Hearn - all style no substance...
Posted: 15 Apr 2012, 07:56
by whiskey
Sorry but Froch was filling the arena on a Friday fight night against Robin Reid in domestic fights.
He could have no undercard at all and sell out.
Like others say, they will be working on a budget to pay Bute (the champion) close to what he normally earns with 18,000 in the Bell centre.
There's some decent fighters like Cotey on the undercard. His last fight was terrific.
Re: Eddie Hearn - all style no substance...
Posted: 15 Apr 2012, 11:39
by danfoster
G0mez wrote:Sorry but Froch was filling the arena on a Friday fight night against Robin Reid in domestic fights.
He could have no undercard at all and sell out.
Like others say, they will be working on a budget to pay Bute (the champion) close to what he normally earns with 18,000 in the Bell centre.
There's some decent fighters like Cotey on the undercard. His last fight was terrific.
I must say that i agree - the Froch v Bute fight is such a quality match i honestly believe that the undercard is irrelevant - and i don't often say that!
Re: Eddie Hearn - all style no substance...
Posted: 15 Apr 2012, 12:12
by Alba
the fight still has just under 6 weeks FFS. Plenty of time for the card to fill up ...i dont think we will be let down.
Re: Eddie Hearn - all style no substance...
Posted: 15 Apr 2012, 12:33
by Final round
Wrists wrote:Getting Bute over here is a real coup - and also an expensive one so you can forgive the less than stellar undercard.
I like Hearn, he puts on good shows and doesn't seem to get involved in spouting bullshit.
Don't agree, he talked up Audley Harrison into getting a shot at the title. He talks shit when it suits him just like the rest.
Re: Eddie Hearn - all style no substance...
Posted: 15 Apr 2012, 12:40
by whiskey
Final round wrote:Wrists wrote:Getting Bute over here is a real coup - and also an expensive one so you can forgive the less than stellar undercard.
I like Hearn, he puts on good shows and doesn't seem to get involved in spouting bullshit.
Don't agree, he talked up Audley Harrison into getting a shot at the title. He talks shit when it suits him just like the rest.
I think he means throwing insults, rather than over-selling.
To be fair Audley even had half of us convinced.
Re: Eddie Hearn - all style no substance...
Posted: 15 Apr 2012, 13:53
by Final round
G0mez wrote:Final round wrote:Wrists wrote:Getting Bute over here is a real coup - and also an expensive one so you can forgive the less than stellar undercard.
I like Hearn, he puts on good shows and doesn't seem to get involved in spouting bullshit.
Don't agree, he talked up Audley Harrison into getting a shot at the title. He talks shit when it suits him just like the rest.
I think he means throwing insults, rather than over-selling.
To be fair Audley even had half of us convinced.
Give him time Gomez he'll be calling Khan a fraud just like his dad in no time :)
Audley had you convinced? never mate.
Re: Eddie Hearn - all style no substance...
Posted: 15 Apr 2012, 14:20
by Wake up call
Erick Ochieng v AA Lowe and John Ryder v Luke Robinson are good trade fights.
Ryan Aston is being pushed forwards against the experienced Paul Samuels.
There's nothing wrong with this undercard.
Re: Eddie Hearn - all style no substance...
Posted: 15 Apr 2012, 16:43
by mcato
Wake up call wrote:Erick Ochieng v AA Lowe and John Ryder v Luke Robinson are good trade fights.
Ryan Aston is being pushed forwards against the experienced Paul Samuels.
There's nothing wrong with this undercard.
Ryder v Robinson is that confirmed?
Re: Eddie Hearn - all style no substance...
Posted: 15 Apr 2012, 18:22
by Wake up call
Mark Bateson (Luke's manager) told me it is yesterday.
Re: Eddie Hearn - all style no substance...
Posted: 15 Apr 2012, 19:37
by 15829
Wake up call wrote:Erick Ochieng v AA Lowe and John Ryder v Luke Robinson are good trade fights.
Ryan Aston is being pushed forwards against the experienced Paul Samuels.
There's nothing wrong with this undercard.
If a certain promoter had put together this undercard together people would be going mad
Re: Eddie Hearn - all style no substance...
Posted: 16 Apr 2012, 02:58
by Tommy Gunn13
Eddie Hearn does seem to have quite a few Nut Huggers...
Re: Eddie Hearn - all style no substance...
Posted: 16 Apr 2012, 06:09
by Wake up call
diggler wrote:Wake up call wrote:Erick Ochieng v AA Lowe and John Ryder v Luke Robinson are good trade fights.
Ryan Aston is being pushed forwards against the experienced Paul Samuels.
There's nothing wrong with this undercard.
If a certain promoter had put together this undercard together people would be going mad
Yeah but does that certain promoter actually pay his fighters?
Re: Eddie Hearn - all style no substance...
Posted: 16 Apr 2012, 06:15
by Tommy Gunn13
Wake up call wrote:diggler wrote:Wake up call wrote:Erick Ochieng v AA Lowe and John Ryder v Luke Robinson are good trade fights.
Ryan Aston is being pushed forwards against the experienced Paul Samuels.
There's nothing wrong with this undercard.
If a certain promoter had put together this undercard together people would be going mad
Yeah but does that certain promoter actually pay his fighters?
I keep hearing all these fighters havnt been paid,if i was owed money id be screaming from the roof tops....so why they all keeping quiet??