Haskins gets European title crack
Posted: 23 Apr 2012, 04:06
Underrated? Maybe. Awful to watch? Definitelydondada wrote:http://news.boxrec.com/news/2012/haskin ... ll-vacates
Very underrated fighter is Haskins.
It was certainly scrappy. However, a classy match would have suited Don who had looked great up until then. Haskins made it his fight the way he had to make it to get the win. I like the fact that Haskins has been around for ages, been winning for ages, and despite not getting a shot until now, you don't really hear the kid moaning. He's old school, sort of.greenyox3 wrote:The Broadhurst fight put me right off watching either of them again.
Apart from early on when he scored a few nice looking stoppages, every single Haskins fight has been scrappy.JamesH wrote:It was certainly scrappy. However, a classy match would have suited Don who had looked great up until then. Haskins made it his fight the way he had to make it to get the win. I like the fact that Haskins has been around for ages, been winning for ages, and despite not getting a shot until now, you don't really hear the kid moaning. He's old school, sort of.greenyox3 wrote:The Broadhurst fight put me right off watching either of them again.
I know what you mean, but the fact is Haskins is more effective than Napa, who only beat Haskins because Lee was injured. I'm not saying I'd rather watch Haskins, but I do think he's earned some of the chances Napa had after failing previously. Napa's style was far more pleasing on the eye, but he often fell short (excuse the unintended pun).Lenny wrote:Apart from early on when he scored a few nice looking stoppages, every single Haskins fight has been scrappy.JamesH wrote:It was certainly scrappy. However, a classy match would have suited Don who had looked great up until then. Haskins made it his fight the way he had to make it to get the win. I like the fact that Haskins has been around for ages, been winning for ages, and despite not getting a shot until now, you don't really hear the kid moaning. He's old school, sort of.greenyox3 wrote:The Broadhurst fight put me right off watching either of them again.
He can be effective don't get me wrong, but seeing him grab, slap, tire fairly early and generally look really messy with his hands by his sides isn't for me.
Give me the Ian Napa of a couple of years ago any day of the week
I dunno about that. For me Napa was always beating Haskins, injury or not and I'd have him down as the more effective fighter.JamesH wrote:I know what you mean, but the fact is Haskins is more effective than Napa, who only beat Haskins because Lee was injured. I'm not saying I'd rather watch Haskins, but I do think he's earned some of the chances Napa had after failing previously. Napa's style was far more pleasing on the eye, but he often fell short (excuse the unintended pun).Lenny wrote:Apart from early on when he scored a few nice looking stoppages, every single Haskins fight has been scrappy.JamesH wrote: It was certainly scrappy. However, a classy match would have suited Don who had looked great up until then. Haskins made it his fight the way he had to make it to get the win. I like the fact that Haskins has been around for ages, been winning for ages, and despite not getting a shot until now, you don't really hear the kid moaning. He's old school, sort of.
He can be effective don't get me wrong, but seeing him grab, slap, tire fairly early and generally look really messy with his hands by his sides isn't for me.
Give me the Ian Napa of a couple of years ago any day of the week
Barca play some good football, but the apparently more effective Real might well win la liga. Of course, whether or not you watch Jose pick up the trophy is another matter !
Has been in a couple of stinkers but I've also enjoyed several of his fights.Lenny wrote:Underrated? Maybe. Awful to watch? Definitelydondada wrote:http://news.boxrec.com/news/2012/haskin ... ll-vacates
Very underrated fighter is Haskins.
Have to disagree there (although its from memory), but I thought Haskins got injured early on and fought on for a few rounds with one hand/arm. I also think it was (another) last chance saloon for Napa. I think at that stage, an injury free Haskins would have won that for me.Lenny wrote:I dunno about that. For me Napa was always beating Haskins, injury or not and I'd have him down as the more effective fighter.
Haskins would have been beaten soundly by a fighter like Booth a couple of years back and Damaen Kelly would have made him look silly. Napa was in very close fights with these guys.
My misses hated the Napa fights I watched at home, his name became synonymous with the full 12 rounds.
Haskins has racked up the wins though as deserves a shot. All the best to those who buy a ticket.