BoxRec

Has Anyone got this? If so what do you think? I havent read it myself yet but its waiting for me when i finish work. Looking forward to it and im sure it will have a few talking points.

I disagreed with many selections but it's a quality read

Chris W 1982 wrote:I disagreed with many selections but it's a quality read

Most concise answer EVER!

Khaosai-Galaxy wrote:

Chris W 1982 wrote:I disagreed with many selections but it's a quality read

Most concise answer EVER!

Ha Ha. Cheers mate

The order of the fighters concerns me greatly. I'd like a greater definition of why that fighter is in the position he is rather than just biographical information.

The biographies are good reads and it's a good tool when observing the careers and attributes of older fighters.

Chris W 1982 wrote:

Khaosai-Galaxy wrote:

Chris W 1982 wrote:I disagreed with many selections but it's a quality read

Most concise answer EVER!

Ha Ha. Cheers mate

The order of the fighters concerns me greatly. I'd like a greater definition of why that fighter is in the position he is rather than just biographical information.

The biographies are good reads and it's a good tool when observing the careers and attributes of older fighters.

I supose the real purpose of these lists is to provide a framework for the biographies. Its an impossible task, ranking fighters.

Example, who would you rank as the better puncher Naseem, or Lennox Lewis?

Or indeed ranking sexual encounters.

Who was better, that Brazilian waitress you had a fling with in 2007? or Mr Peters, your old Scout Master?


Apples and Oranges..