Page 1 of 1
Hennessy lost purse bid (Eastman going on Holiday)
Posted: 17 Feb 2004, 15:45
by REAL_DEAL
purse bid
an auction for a middleweight final eliminator between Howard Eastman vs Cristian Sanavia was won by Italian promoter OPI 2000 with a bid of $217,300.
Eastman going on Holiday to Hell

Re: Hennessy lost purse bid (Eastman going on Holiday)
Posted: 17 Feb 2004, 15:57
by bennie
REAL_DEAL wrote:purse bid
an auction for a middleweight final eliminator between Howard Eastman vs Cristian Sanavia was won by Italian promoter OPI 2000 with a bid of $217,300.
Eastman going on Holiday to Hell

He wins the Witter bid and loses the Eastman one. Strange sense of priorities.
Eastman won't beat Sanavia in Italy.
Posted: 17 Feb 2004, 16:02
by REAL_DEAL
Posted: 17 Feb 2004, 16:04
by stujones
Nothing corrupt about the last time a Brit went to Italy to challenge for some honours. Zoff got the decision he deserved against Burke. Also, Michael Hunter and Derek Roache scored wins that evening.
Perhaps, the public (internet and boxing TV people) scathing of recent "home" town decision (and we are as bad as anyone) - might slow down the rot. I personally thought that Woods vs Johnson II was closer than Woods vs Johnson I.
Posted: 17 Feb 2004, 16:07
by bennie
Eastman's had it easy in his pro career to date. Now, for the first time, he will really have to show his mettle. Beating Rob McCracken to secure a first world title shot is nowt compared to this.
Posted: 17 Feb 2004, 16:09
by REAL_DEAL
I just got a shout out on eurosport about this fight
Posted: 17 Feb 2004, 16:10
by bennie
REAL_DEAL wrote:I just got a shout out on eurosport about this fight
Was this bid in dollars or Euros, Chris?
Posted: 17 Feb 2004, 16:14
by REAL_DEAL
dollars i think
it took place in Mexico City
Posted: 17 Feb 2004, 16:17
by bennie
REAL_DEAL wrote:dollars i think
it took place in Mexico City
Cheers. Not much of a payday for a WBC final eliminator...
Posted: 17 Feb 2004, 16:19
by REAL_DEAL
How many Eastman fans will go to Italy? (maybe 3) will they have to send froch to the bill so he bring his loud fans over?
Posted: 17 Feb 2004, 16:19
by stujones
bennie wrote:Eastman's had it easy in his pro career to date. Now, for the first time, he will really have to show his mettle. Beating Rob McCracken to secure a first world title shot is nowt compared to this.
I'm actually glad of this - I think this test is exactly what Howard needs. Its been well document that this opponent isn't the best Middleweight out there and had this been in Britain, Eastman would have had the same problems in preperation as he did for the Joppy experience, cause ability wise this guy is not as good as McCraken.
I always maintained that Eastman needs a Bridge between his current opposistion and the champions, this opponent is not an aduquate bridge IMO, but at least the enviiroment gives Eastman a test of sorts, because this is still a lot easier than Hopkins in Battersea.
I'm sure I read somewhere, that should Hopkins vacate the winner of this match takes on Taylor for the championship - don't quote me on that one, perhaps I'm wrong.
Posted: 17 Feb 2004, 16:26
by theguru
Eastmen for me is the Johnny Neslon of the middlewieght division in Britain and Europe.Maybe not the most exciting fighter to watch but he can fight and has ringcraft.
Plenty of european title fights to his credit regardless of what people think it is a highly regarded title by most of the governing bodies.
Posted: 17 Feb 2004, 16:50
by bennie
On the very day allegedly bids $6,500,000 for a fight, Mick Hennessy bids $200,000.
That kind of says something...
Posted: 17 Feb 2004, 16:52
by REAL_DEAL
why didnt Frankie bid on the Eastman fight, kind of gets his own back
Posted: 17 Feb 2004, 17:22
by Matchfixer
Eastman not exciting to watch?!
He is one of my favourite fighters because of his combination of skill and flair.
I'd call John Ruiz a boring fighter not Eastman!!!
Posted: 17 Feb 2004, 17:54
by theguru
Yes it does say something bennie it says they both didnt bid enough.
What else could it say?That Frank doesnt have the financial clout that Don King has? but he has more than Mick?
The key phrase is "know the market" What you said was really just a throw away comment,didnt mean a great deal
Posted: 17 Feb 2004, 17:58
by bennie
theguru wrote:Yes it does say something bennie it says they both didnt bid enough.
What else could it say?That Frank doesnt have the financial clout that Don King has? but he has more than Mick?
The key phrase is "know the market" What you said was really just a throw away comment,didnt mean a great deal
On the contrary, since when did Warren lose a bid involving his biggest fighter?
Re: Hennessy lost purse bid (Eastman going on Holiday)
Posted: 17 Feb 2004, 18:09
by Hellephant
This is nothing to be worried about. If Eastman can't travel to Italy and beat up Sanavia badly, then there is absolutely no reason for him to even think about fighting Hopkins. Sanavia is not very good at all. He looked awful in his last fight against Algoet. For Christ sake, even Hakkar went to Italy and knocked Sanavia out.
Posted: 17 Feb 2004, 19:03
by steve689
I agree with Hellephant, let's not get carried away with Sanavia he is nothing special although Eastman may need to stop him to confirm a win as the judges will do him no favours at all. Hennessy winning the Witter purse bid but losing the Eastman one does seem strange but Eastman must feel like he is always fighting away from home anyway, it's not like he has many fans. If i had the cash and the time then i would go over myself, what is the date of this fight?
Posted: 19 Feb 2004, 12:49
by THEBUTCH
Shame Hennessy lots the purse bids, but I don't fear for Howard going to Italy, Sanavia is beatable and Howard is world class. Eastman is showing more of the urgency needed nowadays to get a win in places like Italy.
Posted: 20 Feb 2004, 17:41
by steve689
Howard must discover his killer instinct to win in places like Italy, that was what stopped him beating Joppy the fact he was too busy dancing and clowning around instead of throwing punches against a beatable opponent. Sanavia is nothing special but home advantage will give him the edge, if he can stay on his feet he will probably win. Eastman needs urgency and sharpness and he can remove this guy within 8 rounds IMO, a win may also carry some benefits in America seen as Jermain Taylor was touted to meet Sanavia at some time soon, a convincing win could raise some eyebrows across the pond.