BoxRec

There seems to be zero in the press about Haye since the Munich debacle ?

Typically there would be Bernard Boente telling the press Haye wants too much loot, countered by Haye saying they agreed there offer etc. All of which indicated communication was still happening.

Could it be it's gone quiet that a deal is done, or that it's a dead fish.

I thought there would be more chance of news about charges being pressed than anything boxing related. I seriously doubt Haye or Booth are in talks with anyone and Haye is probably just partying somewhere and livin it up.

I think that press conference putpaid to David Haye's career..................

He could face charges if he goes back to Germany or certainly face questioning and Vitali will fight another midget or domestic plodder until he retires. There won't be any David Haye fight with either Klitschko.

Don't think it's a done deal YET, I believe it will be vitali's last fight late this year or early next year.

Im under the impression that the whole Haye being wanted in germany thing blown out of proportion anyway.

Apparently the German police are collecting witness statements well after the event in preperation.

'He Glarsed me!' according to messrs Chisora

Final round wrote:
'He Glarsed me!' according to messrs Chisora

MachoMan09 wrote:There's no point whatsoever in trying to compete with the Olympics. The closer we get to the opening ceremony, the fewer the column inches and minutes on sofas that will be made available to non-Olympians. If Vitali decides to fight Haye it won't be this side of September.

Also Euro 2012 starts June 8th then Olympics boxing will get lost this summer.

In response to the Subject title.

Bliss isn't it?

He is fighting chisora on the Mitchell/Burns bill.

smoggy7188 wrote:He is fighting chisora on the Mitchell/Burns bill.

Hah is that a double header with Cleverley/Hopkins

According to Dan Rafael “allegedly” is trying to finalise the details of a show down with Chisora.

July 14th at Upton Park. Haye vs Chisora, Burns vs Mitchell, Cleverley vs Shuktoksy, Groves vs Anderson 2.

I hope Haye fights Chisora and gives the woman beater a good thumping.

ryan917 wrote:July 14th at Upton Park. Haye vs Chisora, Burns vs Mitchell, Cleverley vs Shuktoksy, Groves vs Anderson 2.

Add the resurrection to that list why dont you?!

Try the toe vs the court, Burns vs no name plodder, Cleverly vs (no name plodder), TBA vs TBA (due to injuries and the other guy complaining his pay day is injured)

ryan917 wrote:July 14th at Upton Park. Haye vs Chisora, Burns vs Mitchell, Cleverley vs Shuktoksy, Groves vs Anderson 2.

How without ppv will they finance it?

ryan917 wrote:July 14th at Upton Park. Haye vs Chisora, Burns vs Mitchell, Cleverley vs Shuktoksy, Groves vs Anderson 2.

I'll say it before anyone else does. I'm fornicating disgusted if this gets passed. It's further proof that being a loud mouth gets you bigger pay days than actual talent.

iamasadlittleboy wrote:

ryan917 wrote:July 14th at Upton Park. Haye vs Chisora, Burns vs Mitchell, Cleverley vs Shuktoksy, Groves vs Anderson 2.

I'll say it before anyone else does. I'm effing disgusted if this gets passed. It's further proof that being a loud mouth gets you bigger pay days than actual talent.

Maybe it go ahead not licenced by the Board. Cant see all those be made

iamasadlittleboy wrote:

ryan917 wrote:July 14th at Upton Park. Haye vs Chisora, Burns vs Mitchell, Cleverley vs Shuktoksy, Groves vs Anderson 2.

I'll say it before anyone else does. I'm effing disgusted if this gets passed. It's further proof that being a loud mouth gets you bigger pay days than actual talent.

Are you talking about Haye?

keithmoonhangover wrote:

iamasadlittleboy wrote:

ryan917 wrote:July 14th at Upton Park. Haye vs Chisora, Burns vs Mitchell, Cleverley vs Shuktoksy, Groves vs Anderson 2.

I'll say it before anyone else does. I'm effing disgusted if this gets passed. It's further proof that being a loud mouth gets you bigger pay days than actual talent.

Are you talking about Haye?

Both Haye and Chisora. Haye fleeced the public twice for nothing peformances whilst Chisora has had more lives (chances) than your average cat.

iamasadlittleboy wrote:

ryan917 wrote:July 14th at Upton Park. Haye vs Chisora, Burns vs Mitchell, Cleverley vs Shuktoksy, Groves vs Anderson 2.

I'll say it before anyone else does. I'm effing disgusted if this gets passed. It's further proof that being a loud mouth gets you bigger pay days than actual talent.

First of all, there is surely no way this bill gets made. Second, if by some miracle Allegedly put that show together and you're not into it... What the eff is up with you? I'd be ringside

iamasadlittleboy wrote:

keithmoonhangover wrote:

iamasadlittleboy wrote: I'll say it before anyone else does. I'm effing disgusted if this gets passed. It's further proof that being a loud mouth gets you bigger pay days than actual talent.

Are you talking about Haye?

Both Haye and Chisora. Haye fleeced the public twice for nothing peformances whilst Chisora has had more lives (chances) than your average cat.

Haye didn't fleece anyone. He won the title, then defended against his mandatory and then he had a well deserved mandatory. Then he had the guts to step up and fight the best heavyweight in the world, when he could easily have gone the easy route and fought Holyfield for big bucks in Vegas.

I'm a huge boxing fan, but there was no way I was paying a penny to see Haye-Harrison.

Yes, the Klitschko fight was a stinker, but then most of Wlad's fights are.

clopixolacuphase wrote:

iamasadlittleboy wrote:

ryan917 wrote:July 14th at Upton Park. Haye vs Chisora, Burns vs Mitchell, Cleverley vs Shuktoksy, Groves vs Anderson 2.

I'll say it before anyone else does. I'm effing disgusted if this gets passed. It's further proof that being a loud mouth gets you bigger pay days than actual talent.

First of all, there is surely no way this bill gets made. Second, if by some miracle Allegedly put that show together and you're not into it... What the eff is up with you? I'd be ringside

I'm not against the BILL just again Haye v Chisora. Mitchell v Burns would get me interested, I wouldn't be convinced that Groves would actually turn up for a fight and Cleverly v Shuktoksy? I'd imagine I'd have sex with Kelly Brook a long time before that fight gets made.

Haye didn't fleece anyone. He won the title, then defended against his mandatory and then he had a well deserved mandatory. Then he had the guts to step up and fight the best heavyweight in the world, when he could easily have gone the easy route and fought Holyfield for big bucks in Vegas.

I'm a huge boxing fan, but there was no way I was paying a penny to see Haye-Harrison.

Yes, the Klitschko fight was a stinker, but then most of Wlad's fights are.

You not paying for Haye-Harrison doesn't mean the casual public didn't. In fact it seems like a lot of people DID pay for it and where very unhappy about it. The Klitschko fight was a stinker but to then go "it my toe boohoo" was bull and summed up Haye's entire reign at Heavyweight-Disappointing. He won a title yes-in a stinker that he blamed on a bad hand, defended against an undeserving mandatory, defended in a joke voluntary and then limped around against the best heavyweight, at least go out on your fornicating sheild.

Maybe he is nursing a sore toe.

iamasadlittleboy wrote:

clopixolacuphase wrote:

iamasadlittleboy wrote: I'll say it before anyone else does. I'm effing disgusted if this gets passed. It's further proof that being a loud mouth gets you bigger pay days than actual talent.

First of all, there is surely no way this bill gets made. Second, if by some miracle Allegedly put that show together and you're not into it... What the eff is up with you? I'd be ringside

I'm not against the BILL just again Haye v Chisora. Mitchell v Burns would get me interested, I wouldn't be convinced that Groves would actually turn up for a fight and Cleverly v Shuktoksy? I'd imagine I'd have sex with Kelly Brook a long time before that fight gets made.

Haye didn't fleece anyone. He won the title, then defended against his mandatory and then he had a well deserved mandatory. Then he had the guts to step up and fight the best heavyweight in the world, when he could easily have gone the easy route and fought Holyfield for big bucks in Vegas.

I'm a huge boxing fan, but there was no way I was paying a penny to see Haye-Harrison.

Yes, the Klitschko fight was a stinker, but then most of Wlad's fights are.

You not paying for Haye-Harrison doesn't mean the casual public didn't. In fact it seems like a lot of people DID pay for it and where very unhappy about it. The Klitschko fight was a stinker but to then go "it my toe boohoo" was bull and summed up Haye's entire reign at Heavyweight-Disappointing. He won a title yes-in a stinker that he blamed on a bad hand, defended against an undeserving mandatory, defended in a joke voluntary and then limped around against the best heavyweight, at least go out on your effing sheild.

1. Let's see anyone fight a 7' 4" Russian and make it look good.
2. It didn't matter if Ruiz was an undeserving mandatory, Haye had no choice but to fight him or get stripped.
3. Harrison was the one that didn't try and win the fight, not Haye.
4. Haye lost fair and aquare to the best Heavyweight on the planet.

Get a grip man.