BoxRec

Formalising a new contract and announcing it tomorrow?

I like bomber, but if he reads some of his old posts he will cringe, despite being warned by some of the wiser heads on here.

jizzle wrote:Formalising a new contract and announcing it tomorrow?

Where did you hear that?

Get ready.
If the author's got it right let battle commence.
Wazza will be on the warpath.

He can kiss goodbye to a rematch with Cleverley then.

mickey1975 wrote:I like bomber, but if he reads some of his old posts he will cringe, despite being warned by some of the wiser heads on here.

I don't think it will bother him, it didn't last time !

He used to post on a different forum under a different name as an amateur and was very vocal in his criticism of a particular promoter, however he soon changed his tune when a year later he signed for that promoter !!

Froch vs Bellew has fight of the year written all over it.

stujones wrote:Froch vs Bellew has fight of the year written all over it.

Dunno mate, Froch looks comfortable at his weight and Bellew looks tight at an already higher weight.

Just noticed that I typed the wrong boxer...When I typed Bellew I actually meant Kal Yafai...

MachoMan09 wrote:Bellew has always struck me as a passionate, honest guy who says what he's feeling there and then. That he doesn't appear to be calculating, cunning, and guarded is a strength, in my view, but it will inevitably lead to what some could interpret as contradictions if you analyse his words over a protracted period of time. This isn't a problem. People are entitled to change their viewpoint. Guys like Bellew aren't the ones you have to worry about.

All of which is true, but his passionate defending of Fwank in the face of some of the valid points that were made, such as the issues about Calzaghe getting paid, make it inevitable that some of us (me included), are inclined to draw his attention to it

Deserter wrote:

MachoMan09 wrote:Bellew has always struck me as a passionate, honest guy who says what he's feeling there and then. That he doesn't appear to be calculating, cunning, and guarded is a strength, in my view, but it will inevitably lead to what some could interpret as contradictions if you analyse his words over a protracted period of time. This isn't a problem. People are entitled to change their viewpoint. Guys like Bellew aren't the ones you have to worry about.

All of which is true, but his passionate defending of Fwank in the face of some of the valid points that were made, such as the issues about Calzaghe getting paid, make it inevitable that some of us (me included), are inclined to draw his attention to it

Not to menation his almost evangelical praise of his former trainer.

Until he realised a couple of years later that Manchester was a 45 minute drive from Liverpool ...........

Yep,tony should admit he was wrong for coming on here and questioning khans loyalty when khan left to further his career seeing as tony is about to do exactly the same thing himself.

I'm not saying there is anything wrong with tony leaving to further his career as this is a ruthless business and you have to look after your own interests but it was wrong to criticise khan for leaving warren only to do the same himself when he could see that the grass was greener on the other side.

I think Tony has started to get to the point of realising when to hold his own counsel, to the detriment of this forum to name one.

Tony is a top lad and loves a fight.FFwarren has no loyalty to anyone so why should Tony have loyalty to him? Look how Kell Brook has progressed under Hearn.Better on Skysports than allegedly!

Totally agree macho man khan was on mega money and was being well looked after but tonys tone at the time was along the lines of ''thats something i'd never do''.