Mitchell/Barrera July 14th?
Posted: 23 May 2012, 11:51
twenty six wrote:Just another ridiculous match up on a night that isn't showcasing boxing well.
and audley harrison as the panto dame...Palimpsest wrote:twenty six wrote:Just another ridiculous match up on a night that isn't showcasing boxing well.
Indeed, I'm just waiting to hear that Tommy Morrison/Kimbo Slice/Butterbean is featuring in a supporting bout and the pantomime will be complete.
Good pointsmoggy7188 wrote:Anyone else get the feeling he has tried to bring him back over before but couldnt get a license for him?
jimcook wrote:and audley harrison as the panto dame...Palimpsest wrote:twenty six wrote:Just another ridiculous match up on a night that isn't showcasing boxing well.
Indeed, I'm just waiting to hear that Tommy Morrison/Kimbo Slice/Butterbean is featuring in a supporting bout and the pantomime will be complete.
I guess they still fear Katsidis is the reason. Mitchell has done a good rebuild job and the Australian could end it.The Dark Destroyer wrote:Why not fight Katsidis again? At least he'd be ranked in the top fifteen of the WBO. I hope this fight gets as much stick as the Khan Barrera fight, and he was thee years younger then.
Calm down, get your knickers out of a twist. We would all like to see Barrera call it a day, he's clearly a faded force, but if he's not getting beaten up in his fights i dont see why you are taking such a drastic view on this fight? Khan clearly dominated him, but he is one of the fastest fighters in the history of boxing and an old Barrera just could'nt compete with his speed. He wont have that trouble with Mitchell. Unless Mitchell does a back peddeling masterpiece i think there's a very good chance he'll get knocked out by old man Barrera!MachoMan09 wrote:Fair play to Kev if he stands up to Warren and says he's not interested in fighting a badly faded force. Mitchell is a boxing man through and through and he'd be the first to say that a victory over Barrera now is about as hollow as it gets.
P.S. Any boxing journalist that tries to put any sort of positive spin on a Barrera -vs- Mitchell encounter - and that includes those who work on BN - will lose any credibility they've ever had, in my view.
Who's Kevin going to fight to earn a shot at Ricky Burns put him in with a live top 10 opponent to prove hes world class and deserves a shot!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1winkveron wrote:Mitchell seems unsure too. He posted on Twitter that he doesn't know if this is the route he wants to take to world titles as he respects Barrera so much
Have to agree, although his past his best his no more inactive then Mitchell over the last 2 or 3 years, It would be a good crowd pleaser, the crowd went crazy when he came to the M E N.billy nelson wrote:MAB would be a good fight,that cut against Amir would have fucked up any plans up during that fight.
Given a good clean fight imo it could be a good un
You can't be serious? Barrera was 'dominated' by his own gore pouring into his eyes and blinding him for five rounds, thanks to a clash of heads in the opening 60 seconds. As for Khan being "one of the fastest fighters in the history of boxing", give me a bit of what you're smoking.ALI wrote:Khan clearly dominated him, but he is one of the fastest fighters in the history of boxing and an old Barrera just could'nt compete with his speed.
I'm usually the first to criticise Khan but is this claim really that ridiculous? He's certainly one of the fastest, if not the fastest currently active and you'd assume that with modern training methods and facilities boxers now are quicker than they were.loaded_gloves wrote:You can't be serious? Barrera was 'dominated' by his own gore pouring into his eyes and blinding him for five rounds, thanks to a clash of heads in the opening 60 seconds. As for Khan being "one of the fastest fighters in the history of boxing", give me a bit of what you're smoking.ALI wrote:Khan clearly dominated him, but he is one of the fastest fighters in the history of boxing and an old Barrera just could'nt compete with his speed.