Page 1 of 1

The TitleBout Rankings

Posted: 26 Jun 2012, 23:30
by BoxBuzz
Love em' or hate em' here they are.

1. Benny Leonard
2. Muhammad Ali
3. Rocky Marciano
4. Jack Dempsey
5. Joe Louis
6. Gene Tunney
7. EdeR Jofre
8. Harry Greb
9. Roberto Duran
10. Henry Armstrong
11. Roy Jones Jr.
12. Stanley Ketchel
13. Kid Chocolate
14. Alexis Arguello
15. Jimmy Wilde
16. Pernell Whitaker
17. Abe Attell
18. Archie Moore
19. Sandy Saddler
20. Julio Cesar Chavez
21. Salvador Sanchez
22. Joe Gans
23. Ray Leonard
24. Ezzard Charles
25. Carlos Monzon
26. Willie Pep Tied with Sugar Ray Robinson
27. Barney Ross
28. Tommy Gibbons
29. Bernard Hopkins
30. Peter Jackson
31. Kid Gavilan
32. Sam Langford
33. Dulio Loi
34. Naseem Hamed
35. Floyd Mayweather Jr
36. Charlie Zellenoff


Let me know if your fighter is missing.....

Re: The TitleBout Rankings

Posted: 26 Jun 2012, 23:49
by JDC
Good stuff Buzz :bow:

Re: The TitleBout Rankings

Posted: 27 Jun 2012, 09:13
by Techno89
BoxBuzz wrote:Let me know if your fighter is missing.....
Buzz I think you missed out Sugar Ray Robinson.

:TU:

Re: The TitleBout Rankings

Posted: 27 Jun 2012, 09:16
by BoxBuzz
Yep....I've eliminated old HW's such as Joe Frazier from the rankings and somehow passed over SRR as well.....he'll fit in somwhere....I'll amend it tonight....

Re: The TitleBout Rankings

Posted: 27 Jun 2012, 09:59
by Techno89
BoxBuzz wrote:Yep....I've eliminated old HW's such as Joe Frazier from the rankings and somehow passed over SRR as well.....he'll fit in somwhere....I'll amend it tonight....

:TU:

Re: The TitleBout Rankings

Posted: 27 Jun 2012, 12:58
by BoxBuzz
DetroitHxC wrote:Mr. Jofre would like the missing "r" added to his name, or there WILL be hell to pay!

Image

In order to Atone, Mr Jofre has been issued a capital "R".

Re: The TitleBout Rankings

Posted: 27 Jun 2012, 21:11
by BoxBuzz
fixed.....

Re: The TitleBout Rankings

Posted: 28 Jun 2012, 10:02
by Crease
:o

Sugar Ray Robinson down in the 20s?

Re: The TitleBout Rankings

Posted: 30 Jun 2012, 16:58
by Cap
How is it again that you arrived at these rankings? And who is this guy bringing up the rear? :DD

Cap

Re: The TitleBout Rankings

Posted: 30 Jun 2012, 19:35
by BoxBuzz
Cap.....it's based on the performance of the last 10 weeks of sim activity.

Charlie Zellenoff....well he's a story unto himself. Google "Charlie Zellenoff and Floyd Mayweather Sr"...and see what pops up.

Re: The TitleBout Rankings

Posted: 01 Jul 2012, 13:58
by Cap
BoxBuzz wrote:Cap.....it's based on the performance of the last 10 weeks of sim activity.

Charlie Zellenoff....well he's a story unto himself. Google "Charlie Zellenoff and Floyd Mayweather Sr"...and see what pops up.
There's a multiple homocide waiting to happen....he needs help immediately.

Re: The TitleBout Rankings

Posted: 01 Jul 2012, 15:47
by BoxBuzz
Cap wrote:
BoxBuzz wrote:Cap.....it's based on the performance of the last 10 weeks of sim activity.

Charlie Zellenoff....well he's a story unto himself. Google "Charlie Zellenoff and Floyd Mayweather Sr"...and see what pops up.
There's a multiple homocide waiting to happen....he needs help immediately.
I'm afraid he'll lie victim before help arrives. He's been on that path for years. He's certifiable without question.

I honestly thought he was a comic for the first year or so.

and.....he can be incredibly funny, in sort of a Sacha Baron Coen sort of way. But tragically the humor he evokes is totally unbeknownst to himself.

Re: The TitleBout Rankings

Posted: 01 Jul 2012, 17:02
by Deadendgeneration
SRR is down in the 20s yet mandatory challenger for the WBC :doh:

Re: The TitleBout Rankings

Posted: 04 Jul 2012, 17:55
by Crease
Deadendgeneration wrote:SRR is down in the 20s yet mandatory challenger for the WBC :doh:
Those Title Bout rankings have little crediblity in my opinion... Robinson's record has been pretty good thus far (as expected)...
It's just sometimes, I really don't get the TitleBout rankings...

Anyways, they still serve a purpose: They are good for ranking-splitters for those guys on the same points totals, I think we can all recognise that.
:TU: