Page 1 of 2
Haye and Booth reject Micky Vann
Posted: 03 Jul 2012, 16:28
by SteveDow
http://news.boxrec.com/news/2012/hayema ... ickey-vann
I see that the Haye team have refused to allow Micky Vann to referee the contest on the grounds that he is too old and too small to referee a wild fight.
Does the size of the referee really matter? I mean as long as he is a competent referee it should not really be an issue as finding a referee big enough to separate two guys of this size from engaging in a bit of afters if they really wanted to would surely be impossible anyway.
Re: Haye and Booth reject Micky Vann
Posted: 03 Jul 2012, 16:41
by dondada
Booth also mentions the 'long history between Vann and Al Legedly' which is perhaps more to the point.
The bout might as well be sponsored by Age Concern. Paul Thomas is knocking on and last time I saw John Coyle he was saying 'Gladiators, ready!'
Re: Haye and Booth reject Micky Vann
Posted: 03 Jul 2012, 16:44
by SteveDow
The main problem with getting a referee is obviously that the BBBC will ban anyone who is involved from refereeing on BBBC licenced shows so it leaves very few options.
Re: Haye and Booth reject Micky Vann
Posted: 03 Jul 2012, 16:52
by dondada
SteveDow wrote:The main problem with getting a referee is obviously that the BBBC will ban anyone who is involved from refereeing on BBBC licenced shows so it leaves very few options.
Toni Tiberi of the LBF is a ref. Go on Toni son!

Re: Haye and Booth reject Micky Vann
Posted: 03 Jul 2012, 16:58
by milpool
They sometimes have guest referees in the WWE. I reckon it'll add spice to an already tasty match if one of the Klits refereed it!
Re: Haye and Booth reject Micky Vann
Posted: 03 Jul 2012, 17:00
by leforge
milpool wrote:They sometimes have guest referees in the WWE. I reckon it'll add spice to an already tasty match if one of the Klits refereed it!
They have Mike Tyson in like they did in Wwe
Re: Haye and Booth reject Micky Vann
Posted: 03 Jul 2012, 17:52
by jameswilson
leforge wrote:milpool wrote:They sometimes have guest referees in the WWE. I reckon it'll add spice to an already tasty match if one of the Klits refereed it!
They have Mike Tyson in like they did in Wwe
I'd prefer Rowdy Roddy Piper. The picture of professionalism and impartiality in the bout he reffed between Bret Hart and Yokozuna at Wrestlemania 10. Tyson didn't exactly show great impartiality in that after the fight he knocked the guy who lost out for complaining.............actually given that Chisora is gonna get beat and will probably complain I'd say Tyson is an excellent choice!!!
Re: Haye and Booth reject Micky Vann
Posted: 03 Jul 2012, 18:09
by taffytoon
jameswilson wrote:leforge wrote:milpool wrote:They sometimes have guest referees in the WWE. I reckon it'll add spice to an already tasty match if one of the Klits refereed it!
They have Mike Tyson in like they did in Wwe
I'd prefer Rowdy Roddy Piper. The picture of professionalism and impartiality in the bout he reffed between Bret Hart and Yokozuna at Wrestlemania 10. Tyson didn't exactly show great impartiality in that after the fight he knocked the guy who lost out for complaining.............actually given that Chisora is gonna get beat and will probably complain I'd say Tyson is an excellent choice!!!
Any of the above will just be the icing on this circus freak show, why not get a humped back dwarf? Maybe that will sell a few more tickets.
Re: Haye and Booth reject Micky Vann
Posted: 03 Jul 2012, 18:17
by IRLangmaid25
SteveDow wrote:http://news.boxrec.com/news/2012/hayema ... ickey-vann
I see that the Haye team have refused to allow Micky Vann to referee the contest on the grounds that he is too old and too small to referee a wild fight.
Does the size of the referee really matter? I mean as long as he is a competent referee it should not really be an issue as finding a referee big enough to separate two guys of this size from engaging in a bit of afters if they really wanted to would surely be impossible anyway.
It does matter. When Tyson and Lewis fought that had to get Eddie Cotton who is 6ft 5 and about 230 pounds to ref it to deal with the personalities in the ring.
Re: Haye and Booth reject Micky Vann
Posted: 03 Jul 2012, 18:32
by jameswilson
taffytoon wrote:jameswilson wrote:leforge wrote:
They have Mike Tyson in like they did in Wwe
I'd prefer Rowdy Roddy Piper. The picture of professionalism and impartiality in the bout he reffed between Bret Hart and Yokozuna at Wrestlemania 10. Tyson didn't exactly show great impartiality in that after the fight he knocked the guy who lost out for complaining.............actually given that Chisora is gonna get beat and will probably complain I'd say Tyson is an excellent choice!!!
Any of the above will just be the icing on this circus freak show, why not get a humped back dwarf? Maybe that will sell a few more tickets.
They were aiming for a hump backed dwarf but Haye and Booth have said no to him.
Re: Haye and Booth reject Micky Vann
Posted: 03 Jul 2012, 18:53
by dalcumly
I keep looking for the earliest indication as to how the fight won't happen . I had thought a back injury to Haye , then the fall out with Chisora and his trainer ,and now the objections to the referee .
Maybe I've simply been wrong all along ,and this farce will go ahead after all ? However , I STILL believe it will be postponed .
Re: Haye and Booth reject Micky Vann
Posted: 03 Jul 2012, 19:09
by wrimc
I think the Wlad as a guest ref would be class
In all seriousness though I do think there is some weight in the whole small guy pushing pension age reffing two 230+ guys in a ring where it could get nasty. Is he going to be able to take real control if things start to get messy. Physically breaking them up in the clinches?
Re: Haye and Booth reject Micky Vann
Posted: 03 Jul 2012, 19:57
by The_Don1
What about Roger Tillerman? He'd suit the pantomime occasion
Re: Haye and Booth reject Micky Vann
Posted: 04 Jul 2012, 01:32
by earsjohn
IRLangmaid25 wrote:SteveDow wrote:http://news.boxrec.com/news/2012/hayema ... ickey-vann
I see that the Haye team have refused to allow Micky Vann to referee the contest on the grounds that he is too old and too small to referee a wild fight.
Does the size of the referee really matter? I mean as long as he is a competent referee it should not really be an issue as finding a referee big enough to separate two guys of this size from engaging in a bit of afters if they really wanted to would surely be impossible anyway.
It does matter. When Tyson and Lewis fought that had to get Eddie Cotton who is 6ft 5 and about 230 pounds to ref it to deal with the personalities in the ring.
Micky Vann reffed Bruno v Lewis and his size didn't stop him getting involved and giving them a bollocking. I don't think it's the size of the man but the size of the mans' cojones.
Re: Haye and Booth reject Micky Vann
Posted: 04 Jul 2012, 02:32
by leforge
earsjohn wrote:IRLangmaid25 wrote:SteveDow wrote:http://news.boxrec.com/news/2012/hayema ... ickey-vann
I see that the Haye team have refused to allow Micky Vann to referee the contest on the grounds that he is too old and too small to referee a wild fight.
Does the size of the referee really matter? I mean as long as he is a competent referee it should not really be an issue as finding a referee big enough to separate two guys of this size from engaging in a bit of afters if they really wanted to would surely be impossible anyway.
It does matter. When Tyson and Lewis fought that had to get Eddie Cotton who is 6ft 5 and about 230 pounds to ref it to deal with the personalities in the ring.
Micky Vann reffed Bruno v Lewis and his size didn't stop him getting involved and giving them a bollocking. I don't think it's the size of the man but the size of the mans' cojones.
That was nearly 20 years ago he was much younger.
Re: Haye and Booth reject Micky Vann
Posted: 04 Jul 2012, 03:11
by leforge
dalcumly wrote:I keep looking for the earliest indication as to how the fight won't happen . I had thought a back injury to Haye , then the fall out with Chisora and his trainer ,and now the objections to the referee .
Maybe I've simply been wrong all along ,and this farce will go ahead after all ? However , I STILL believe it will be postponed .
Not POvetkin step in last moment.
Re: Haye and Booth reject Micky Vann
Posted: 04 Jul 2012, 03:22
by The Insider
dondada wrote:Booth also mentions the 'long history between Vann and Al Legedly' which is perhaps more to the point.
^^this^^ is likely to be the reason. What is commonly known as the "WBF years".
Re: Haye and Booth reject Micky Vann
Posted: 04 Jul 2012, 04:04
by whiskey
I side 100% with Team Haye.
Sure, it would be nice to see Vann on these shores again, but he can thank loose cannon Chisora for losing the gig.
Re: Haye and Booth reject Micky Vann
Posted: 04 Jul 2012, 04:12
by earsjohn
leforge wrote:earsjohn wrote:IRLangmaid25 wrote:
It does matter. When Tyson and Lewis fought that had to get Eddie Cotton who is 6ft 5 and about 230 pounds to ref it to deal with the personalities in the ring.
Micky Vann reffed Bruno v Lewis and his size didn't stop him getting involved and giving them a bollocking. I don't think it's the size of the man but the size of the mans' cojones.
That was nearly 20 years ago he was much younger.
He may have been younger but he wasn't any bigger.
Re: Haye and Booth reject Micky Vann
Posted: 04 Jul 2012, 04:44
by dondada
The_Don1 wrote:What about Roger Tillerman? He'd suit the pantomime occasion
Even more so given that he died a couple of months ago. Could be brought into the ring by Paul Bearer.
Re: Haye and Booth reject Micky Vann
Posted: 04 Jul 2012, 04:51
by orbtastic
Vann did just fine with Bruno and Lewis and had to take them task several times. He was a little slow in stopping the fight but that wasn't due to his size (or lack of).
Re: Haye and Booth reject Micky Vann
Posted: 04 Jul 2012, 05:07
by twenty six
Insider,
Think you mean the WBU years ?
Of course team Haye are gonna object to Mickey boy.
He refereed a high proportion of Bunny's headline fights and well, let's just say he was a homer.
In the early Hatton years of serious cuts he always found a way of letting the fight go on !
Justice for Ramsay and Thaxton !!!! Both fights should have been stoppped !!!!
I don't agree with the fight but if it were to fall by the wayside now well boxing would slump further into the abyss.
Dalcumly has mentioned a few indicators that maybe all is not well.
So we need a 6' 5'' refereee who is semi retired and does not give a fook if he gets suspended. Answers on a postcard ....
Re: Haye and Booth reject Micky Vann
Posted: 04 Jul 2012, 05:11
by Bard of Boxrec
dondada wrote:The_Don1 wrote:What about Roger Tillerman? He'd suit the pantomime occasion
Even more so given that he died a couple of months ago. Could be brought into the ring by Paul Bearer.
His corpse would do a better job than the live version
Re: Haye and Booth reject Micky Vann
Posted: 04 Jul 2012, 05:53
by The Insider
twenty six wrote:Insider,
Think you mean the WBU years ?
I sure do. Schoolboy error :)
I was of course referring to the dozen or so Wbu fights he did for Hatton.
Re: Haye and Booth reject Micky Vann
Posted: 04 Jul 2012, 06:40
by youngrell
Size isn't really the issue is it? Didn't stop Mills Lane taking control of big men, and he reffed some fights with much more bad blood than this one, Tyson biting Holyfield a good example. This isn't going to be a brawl, Haye will backpedal and box his way through the fight I should imagine.
Shame, I like Mickey Vann, he has better footwork than most boxers.