BoxRec

https://mobile.twitter.com/#!/King_Keav ... 33?photo=1

Why did the tickets have World championship boxing on them

1....The fight was for a 'World' belt

2....They'd be a 'Champion' at the end of it

3....They were having a 'Boxing' match to determine this.

I give you 'World Championship Boxing'

No need to thank me, I'm here to help.

Hagler2002 wrote:1....The fight was for a 'World' belt

2....They'd be a 'Champion' at the end of it

3....They were having a 'Boxing' match to determine this.

I give you 'World Championship Boxing'

No need to thank me, I'm here to help.

1 isn't worded clearly enough. To cover your arse, you need to say 'It was for belts issued by 'World' governing bodies'. It wasn't for a 'world championship'.

Hagler2002 wrote:1....The fight was for a 'World' belt

2....They'd be a 'Champion' at the end of it

3....They were having a 'Boxing' match to determine this.

I give you 'World Championship Boxing'

No need to thank me, I'm here to help.

Absolute bollox and you know it. They were fighting for an internation and European title. World championship boxing my arse.

Originally, the Povetkin fight was for The WBA title. The bill will have been subject to change.

was the fight not for a championship title issued by a world organization?

mickey1975 wrote:Originally, the Povetkin fight was for The WBA title. The bill will have been subject to change.

That makes sense, thank you.

Hagler2002 wrote:was the fight not for a championship title issued by a world organization?

Yes. But that's not what you originally said. It was also not for a 'world championship'.

mickey1975 wrote:Originally, the Povetkin fight was for The WBA title. The bill will have been subject to change.

I'm glad you've cleared that up! the boxrec anoraks were about to go into meltdown because someones ticket had world championship boxing printed on them

dondada wrote:

Hagler2002 wrote:was the fight not for a championship title issued by a world organization?

Yes. But that's not what you originally said. It was also not for a 'world championship'.

In my posts I was been sarcastic trying to imply who gives a shít what was printed on them.

Hagler2002 wrote:

dondada wrote:

Hagler2002 wrote:was the fight not for a championship title issued by a world organization?

Yes. But that's not what you originally said. It was also not for a 'world championship'.

In my posts I was been sarcastic trying to imply who gives a shít what was printed on them.

Of course you were Cluless as usual.

taffytoon wrote: Of course you were Cluless as usual.

Honestly I really couldn't give a shit what was printed on them, If you want to debate the fact that a ticket had world championship boxing on it when there is so much else to talk about this morning regarding last night/this mornings fights you need to get a life you backward fornicate

Hagler2002 wrote:

taffytoon wrote: Of course you were Cluless as usual.

Honestly I really couldn't give a shit what was printed on them, If you want to debate the fact that a ticket had world championship boxing on it when there is so much else to talk about this morning regarding last night/this mornings fights you need to get a life you backward eff

Well said

Final round wrote:

Hagler2002 wrote:

taffytoon wrote: Of course you were Cluless as usual.

Honestly I really couldn't give a shit what was printed on them, If you want to debate the fact that a ticket had world championship boxing on it when there is so much else to talk about this morning regarding last night/this mornings fights you need to get a life you backward eff

Well said

What that an ex world champion beat a domestic level fighter and a chinny fighter got chinned