Page 1 of 1
Should Haye vs Chisora be listed on boxrec?
Posted: 15 Jul 2012, 08:06
by PokerRob
There is currently a lot of discussion as to whether boxrec should list the Haye vs. Chisora fight, ranging from boxrec needs to get of their high horse, to if this fight was listed by boxrec then that would mean corrupt Africa commissions would have to be trusted as well, meaning gym fights or even made up fights could well be listed as well.
Well let’s see what democracy thinks!
Re: Should Haye vs Chisora be listed on boxrec poll!
Posted: 15 Jul 2012, 08:10
by palooka
That was a big fight and a big, well run event, advertised well in advance and it seems to have been popular. It broke no laws, (or the principals would be in chains as we speak?). Did it happen? Will it be in the record books? (Will it be in the BBBoC yearbook?). The bout ought to be listed IMO though I'm not the most thoughtful and subtle of thinkers.
Re: Should Haye vs Chisora be listed on boxrec poll!
Posted: 15 Jul 2012, 08:13
by dondada
PokerRob wrote:There is currently a lot of discussion as to whether boxrec should list the Haye vs. Chisora fight, ranging from boxrec needs to get of their high horse, to if this fight was listed by boxrec then that would mean corrupt Africa commissions would have to be trusted, meaning gym fights or even made up fights could well be listed as well.
Well let’s see what democracy thinks!
WTF are you talking about? I merely pointed out that record keeping wasn't as straightforward as some people might think and cited these as examples, specifically saying this had nothing to do with last night. There was no cause and effect suggested between the two.
Haye-Chisora card on BoxRec
Posted: 15 Jul 2012, 08:36
by Demise
How come BoxRec haven't updated the fighters who took part in this show yet?
Re: Should Haye vs Chisora be listed on boxrec?
Posted: 15 Jul 2012, 08:37
by gregor
BBBoC has its own website, so if they want to pretend Haye-Chisora didn't happen they should do it there.
I understand that some editor(s) may have some relationship with BBBoC, but IMHO there are some limits, and I just wonder what they would do if next time BBBoC orders them to say that 2+2 is 5 on boxrec and ban everyone who says otherwise.
The bottomline is that the fight did happen. Pretending it didn't is like closing your eyes and saying that since everything you saw dissapeared it no longer exist (BTW, wasn't the philosopher who invented this idea British?... oh, I am sorry, he was Irish, but I guess he would be definitely hired by BBBoC nowadays).
Re: Haye-Chisora card on BoxRec
Posted: 15 Jul 2012, 08:38
by dondada
Demise wrote:How come BoxRec haven't updated the fighters who took part in this show yet?
Nice second post.
In this light though, this answer to your first post is...'don't bother'

Re: Should Haye vs Chisora be listed on boxrec?
Posted: 15 Jul 2012, 08:40
by dondada
gregor wrote: I just wonder what they would do if next time BBBoC orders them to say that 2+2 is 5 on boxrec and ban everyone who says otherwise.
'Next time'? The BBBoC hasn't ordered BoxRec to do anything this time! How could they?
Re: Should Haye vs Chisora be listed on boxrec poll!
Posted: 15 Jul 2012, 08:43
by keithmoonhangover
dondada wrote:PokerRob wrote:There is currently a lot of discussion as to whether boxrec should list the Haye vs. Chisora fight, ranging from boxrec needs to get of their high horse, to if this fight was listed by boxrec then that would mean corrupt Africa commissions would have to be trusted, meaning gym fights or even made up fights could well be listed as well.
Well let’s see what democracy thinks!
WTF are you talking about? I merely pointed out that record keeping wasn't as straightforward as some people might think and cited these as examples, specifically saying this had nothing to do with last night. There was no cause and effect suggested between the two.
dondada. This is what The Law posted in response to my question the other day.
The reason is because Boxrec only list shows on the Boxrec 'schedule' which are sanctioned by the national governing body (i.e. the country where the fight is taking place).
We do list the 'results' of other shows (including unsanctioned shows), but they do not appear on our schedule. Therefore the result of Haye v Chisora should appear on Boxrec but it will not appear on our schedule.
We have always had this rule in place.
Re: Should Haye vs Chisora be listed on boxrec poll!
Posted: 15 Jul 2012, 08:48
by gregor
The reason is because Boxrec only list shows on the Boxrec 'schedule' which are sanctioned by the national governing body (i.e. the country where the fight is taking place).
We do list the 'results' of other shows (including unsanctioned shows), but they do not appear on our schedule. Therefore the result of Haye v Chisora should appear on Boxrec but it will not appear on our schedule.
We have always had this rule in place.
The fight was held in EU and was sanctioned by a board also coming from there. For me it should be good enough

Re: Should Haye vs Chisora be listed on boxrec?
Posted: 15 Jul 2012, 09:26
by Crease
Yes. BoxRec is meant to be an impartial observer. The fight did happen, and Haye won.
Re: Should Haye vs Chisora be listed on boxrec poll!
Posted: 15 Jul 2012, 15:18
by dondada
keithmoonhangover wrote:dondada wrote:PokerRob wrote:There is currently a lot of discussion as to whether boxrec should list the Haye vs. Chisora fight, ranging from boxrec needs to get of their high horse, to if this fight was listed by boxrec then that would mean corrupt Africa commissions would have to be trusted, meaning gym fights or even made up fights could well be listed as well.
Well let’s see what democracy thinks!
WTF are you talking about? I merely pointed out that record keeping wasn't as straightforward as some people might think and cited these as examples, specifically saying this had nothing to do with last night. There was no cause and effect suggested between the two.
dondada. This is what The Law posted in response to my question the other day.
The reason is because Boxrec only list shows on the Boxrec 'schedule' which are sanctioned by the national governing body (i.e. the country where the fight is taking place).
We do list the 'results' of other shows (including unsanctioned shows), but they do not appear on our schedule. Therefore the result of Haye v Chisora should appear on Boxrec but it will not appear on our schedule.
We have always had this rule in place.
Aye. And? What's that got to do with the point I was responding to?
Re: Should Haye vs Chisora be listed on boxrec poll!
Posted: 15 Jul 2012, 15:22
by keithmoonhangover
dondada wrote: Aye. And? What's that got to do with the point I was responding to?
I thought it might shed some light on your post. If you don't think so, then just forget it.
Re: Should Haye vs Chisora be listed on boxrec?
Posted: 16 Jul 2012, 17:45
by josh fg
Unless they take the same position on Klitschko fights in Germany under the Austrian commission then this decision makes no sense I voted yes, it was sanctioned, it even had some (slightly crap) belts from sanctioning bodies who are recognised to be won, there was a ref, there were three internationally respected judges and doctors at ring side, I don't go to unlicensed boxing on principle but this one was legit.
I have seen far more dogey bouts sanctioned - see all the unhealthy fighter licensed to fight on native american reservations.