Page 1 of 1

Golovkin vrs proska

Posted: 27 Jul 2012, 17:49
by 1 nut
Very one sided bout .
Sorry proska but I see ko inside five
Golovkin is class act

Re: Golovkin vrs proska

Posted: 28 Jul 2012, 06:01
by stujones
Got to feel a bit for Kerry Hope here. He beat Proska to win the EBU title, but had to defend against the Pole. The minute Proska wins the rematch he gets an immediate title fight.

Re: Golovkin vrs proska

Posted: 28 Jul 2012, 06:50
by The Insider
1 nut wrote:Very one sided bout .
Sorry proska but I see ko inside five
Golovkin is class act
He is, but I think Proska can give him a decent fight. I don't expect Proska to win but I think he will be game and give Golovkin plenty to think about with his constant pressure and spiteful punching. It has the makings of a very good fight and i'll be very much looking forward to this one.

Re: Golovkin vrs proska

Posted: 28 Jul 2012, 07:25
by whiskey
My favourite fight in the calendar at present. Hope sky show it.

Re: Golovkin vrs proska

Posted: 28 Jul 2012, 10:42
by bigh
barker to fight the winner if he comes through his fight ive heard!

Re: Golovkin vrs proska

Posted: 28 Jul 2012, 12:02
by 15829
bigh wrote:barker to fight the winner if he comes through his fight ive heard!

Matchroom need to go down a diffrent to getting a world title shot for barker imo Golovkin is the best middleweight in the world

Re: Golovkin vrs proska

Posted: 28 Jul 2012, 12:58
by GlobalBox
Golovkin is very good but Ouma gave him trouble from a southpaw stance for 3 rounds or so and that was a very faded Ouma, Proksa is a level or two above what the
"Dream" was then and if Ouma can hit GGG then Proksa will as well. When this was first announced I thought Golovkin would win and still do, however, I can see Proksa
giving him fits for a while in this fight and would not rule him out totally.

Re: Golovkin vrs proska

Posted: 28 Jul 2012, 13:09
by LeedsLad
What's up with Golovkin being put in with someone who has a pulse?

His management are awful, he's got ridiculous ability yet keeps being fed chumps.

Re: Golovkin vrs proska

Posted: 28 Jul 2012, 14:01
by jessi
GlobalBox wrote:Golovkin is very good but Ouma gave him trouble from a southpaw stance for 3 rounds or so and that was a very faded Ouma, Proksa is a level or two above what the
"Dream" was then and if Ouma can hit GGG then Proksa will as well. When this was first announced I thought Golovkin would win and still do, however, I can see Proksa
giving him fits for a while in this fight and would not rule him out totally.
Could be close for 3 or 4 rounds, for me though once Golovkin finds his range and timing his awesome !

Re: Golovkin vrs proska

Posted: 28 Jul 2012, 16:38
by reggaereggae
stujones wrote:Got to feel a bit for Kerry Hope here. He beat Proska to win the EBU title, but had to defend against the Pole. The minute Proska wins the rematch he gets an immediate title fight.
Are you saying you would like to have seen hope fight golovkin?

Re: Golovkin vrs proska

Posted: 29 Jul 2012, 14:25
by Autobarn
stujones wrote:Got to feel a bit for Kerry Hope here. He beat Proska to win the EBU title, but had to defend against the Pole. The minute Proska wins the rematch he gets an immediate title fight.
on the other hand, it's good to see proksa's career finally moving forward. seems like he's always been on the backburner, on the undercards, etc.

thisw could be a really tough fight. golovkin has to be favoured, but he can be hit easily by a southpaw.

Re: Golovkin vrs proska

Posted: 29 Jul 2012, 14:55
by Datsue
stujones wrote:Got to feel a bit for Kerry Hope here. He beat Proska to win the EBU title, but had to defend against the Pole. The minute Proska wins the rematch he gets an immediate title fight.
Simples: Proska's best win is Sylvester, which gained him his world ranking; he lost to Hope, defeated Hope in a rematch so is back where he was. Had Hope defeated Proska again, then he would have had two wins of note & be looking to move upwards.

Or did you feel sorry for Hasim Rahman, after Lewis won the rematch & then immediately fought Tyson for eleventy-billion quid?