Page 1 of 1
Is this guy's record serious
Posted: 16 Aug 2012, 11:26
by danconnollyeire
Was looking at the rankign earlier and noticed this guy:
http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_ ... &cat=boxer
Fair play for all those win... didn't know this was humanly possible. Weird state of affairs, he makes Paulie Mag look like Bane. Maybe he needs some venom.
Re: Is this guy's record serious
Posted: 16 Aug 2012, 11:27
by danconnollyeire
Re: Is this guy's record serious
Posted: 16 Aug 2012, 11:57
by GlobalBox
He was in the frame for a fight with Marquez earlier in the year, gone quiet on that front so assume its not happening now.
Re: Is this guy's record serious
Posted: 16 Aug 2012, 11:59
by milpool
Andres Pablo Villafane must have a glass jaw to end all glass jaws since he was bowled over in the 3rd and 4th rounds by this feather fisted pugulist!
Re: Is this guy's record serious
Posted: 16 Aug 2012, 11:59
by jameswilson
Were you really looking at the rankings? Or actualy did you just look at this thread in the Current scene.
http://boxrec.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=155431
where one of the guys about 3 posts down mentions him.
Re: Is this guy's record serious
Posted: 16 Aug 2012, 16:25
by milpool
Ha ha...looking at that thread someone wrote more or less exactly the same as me...
Re: Is this guy's record serious
Posted: 16 Aug 2012, 19:10
by brian13
The announcer would make it sound like his record is 43-1 but seriously he must have two hands that are sponges because his only stoppage was a DQ.
Re: Is this guy's record serious
Posted: 16 Aug 2012, 19:18
by JDC
brian13 wrote:The announcer would make it sound like his record is 43-1 but seriously he must have two hands that are sponges because his only stoppage was a DQ.
DQs don't go down as KOs, although I disagree with them being recorded like this.
Think there's a TKO in there too.

Re: Is this guy's record serious
Posted: 16 Aug 2012, 19:23
by RJP
Hopefully Team Khan are reading this thread!
Re: Is this guy's record serious
Posted: 16 Aug 2012, 19:43
by Bronxbull666
Remarkable record, he's got a decent rating as well. He might just be dedicated to the art of boxing, priding himself on pure skill with no intention of hurting anyone. What a story he could be.
Re: Is this guy's record serious
Posted: 16 Aug 2012, 20:14
by Deano s
RJP wrote:Hopefully Team Khan are reading this thread!
My thoughts exactly ideal candidate for khan's next fight perhaps ask the guy to where 16Oz gloves aswell

Re: Is this guy's record serious
Posted: 16 Aug 2012, 20:25
by iamasadlittleboy
Bronxbull666 wrote:Remarkable record, he's got a decent rating as well. He might just be dedicated to the art of boxing, priding himself on pure skill with no intention of hurting anyone. What a story he could be.
Seen him fight a time or two on TYC sports...he's certainly no sweet scientist.
Re: Is this guy's record serious
Posted: 17 Aug 2012, 01:30
by Bronxbull666
What sort of style did he have?
Noticed he's scored 6 knockdowns according to boxrec. Some weird half point scores on his record, ain't that if a round is drawn it's half a point each? Not enough rounds are scored 10-10 these days IMO.
Re: Is this guy's record serious
Posted: 17 Aug 2012, 03:49
by danconnollyeire
milpool wrote:
Ha ha...looking at that thread someone wrote more or less exactly the same as me...
Nah was looking where Matthew Hatton was rating lol
Also, read some stuff a Marquez etc
Re: Is this guy's record serious
Posted: 17 Aug 2012, 11:21
by iamasadlittleboy
Bronxbull666 wrote:What sort of style did he have?
Noticed he's scored 6 knockdowns according to boxrec. Some weird half point scores on his record, ain't that if a round is drawn it's half a point each? Not enough rounds are scored 10-10 these days IMO.
From what I remember his fights always tended to be messy, lots of jab and hold very very unexciting.
Re: Is this guy's record serious
Posted: 17 Aug 2012, 14:25
by ALI
Deano s wrote:RJP wrote:Hopefully Team Khan are reading this thread!
My thoughts exactly ideal candidate for khan's next fight perhaps ask the guy to where 16Oz gloves aswell

Khan's not even safe with this guy, remember Willie Limond?
Re: Is this guy's record serious
Posted: 17 Aug 2012, 21:20
by IRLangmaid25
ALI wrote:Deano s wrote:RJP wrote:Hopefully Team Khan are reading this thread!
My thoughts exactly ideal candidate for khan's next fight perhaps ask the guy to where 16Oz gloves aswell

Khan's not even safe with this guy, remember Willie Limond?
Yep and Michael Gomez who made most of his career at Super Feather dropped him as well.
Re: Is this guy's record serious
Posted: 17 Aug 2012, 23:05
by el_grande_mauro_mina
Because he has a low KO ratio doesn't mean he is shite - just check out Niccolino Locche - he was a master and had 12 KOs in something like 140 fights.
Re: Is this guy's record serious
Posted: 18 Aug 2012, 13:38
by iamasadlittleboy
Fat Git wrote:Because he has a low KO ratio doesn't mean he is shite - just check out Niccolino Locche - he was a master and had 12 KOs in something like 140 fights.
Locche and Cuenca couldn't be much more polar opposite, only thing they have in common is a nationality and a lack of power.
Re: Is this guy's record serious
Posted: 18 Aug 2012, 16:30
by Old bones Ian
Terry Marsh never KO'd anyone , he had a few stoppages but no clean Ko's. there have been many top boxers with a low KO percentage, Maxie Rosenbloom had 207 wins and only 19 Ko's,
Re: Is this guy's record serious
Posted: 20 Aug 2012, 00:11
by el_grande_mauro_mina
iamasadlittleboy wrote:Fat Git wrote:Because he has a low KO ratio doesn't mean he is shite - just check out Niccolino Locche - he was a master and had 12 KOs in something like 140 fights.
Locche and Cuenca couldn't be much more polar opposite, only thing they have in common is a nationality and a lack of power.
Nonsense! It's true that Locche was worlds apart from most boxers but Cuenca isn't that bad! And I wasn't comparing him to Locche as a boxer anyway, just that you can be
successful and have little power.