Page 1 of 1
Another way back for Hare?
Posted: 05 Mar 2004, 16:12
by stujones
What does everybody think of Hare's chances in getting a WBU title shot (surely Magee will be stripped). Purely my opinon, but I have a feeling that Hare vs Pryce for the WBU title will be a good comeback match.
Re: Another way back for Hare?
Posted: 05 Mar 2004, 16:17
by richter-scale
stujones wrote:What does everybody think of Hare's chances in getting a WBU title shot (surely Magee will be stripped). Purely my opinon, but I have a feeling that Hare vs Pryce for the WBU title will be a good comeback match.
yes, but we all know warren will want to keep hold of the WBU and if Hare fights pryce that won't be the case will it?
Posted: 05 Mar 2004, 16:31
by REAL_DEAL
he will fight for the WBF again, the person who beat hare dropped the belt
Posted: 05 Mar 2004, 17:27
by ArtOfWar
REAL_DEAL wrote:he will fight for the WBF again, the person who beat hare dropped the belt
The person who beat Hare is very smart then, obviously saving himself some money on sanctioning fees.
Hare needs to fight Khaliq or Sinclair, I don't really know what's going on with Sinclair, so Khaliq would be the best bet. Someone will probably say that Hare just lost and Khaliq is coming off a big win, but I get the impression the welterweights are similar to the light middleweights. About two years ago everyone was talking about the domestic light middleweight scene as being red hot. Since then it's all gone wrong, and now there isn't the same buzz or the same amounts of money involved in those fights.
The same buzz was going around Hare, Khaliq and Sinclair not so long ago, now it's gone a bit stale, and they need to do something to create interest again. Hare should probably have a warm up or two, and then he should look to get it on with Khaliq in a fight where they can both make some money.
Are domestic rivals keep missing the boat imo, and they need to start taking more risks against each other. This way the British fans find out who's number 1 in each division, and the fighters get some respect for taking the big domestic risks (not to mention some £££). How the hell are any of are fighter's gonna get a proper world title shot, when their not even sorting things out on their own doorstep?
Posted: 05 Mar 2004, 17:40
by richter-scale
BOLLOCKS19842003 wrote:REAL_DEAL wrote:he will fight for the WBF again, the person who beat hare dropped the belt
The person who beat Hare is very smart then, obviously saving himself some money on sanctioning fees.
Hare needs to fight Khaliq or Sinclair, I don't really know what's going on with Sinclair, so Khaliq would be the best bet. Someone will probably say that Hare just lost and Khaliq is coming off a big win, but I get the impression the welterweights are similar to the light middleweights. About two years ago everyone was talking about the domestic light middleweight scene as being red hot. Since then it's all gone wrong, and now there isn't the same buzz or the same amounts of money involved in those fights.
The same buzz was going around Hare, Khaliq and Sinclair not so long ago, now it's gone a bit stale, and they need to do something to create interest again. Hare should probably have a warm up or two, and then he should look to get it on with Khaliq in a fight where they can both make some money.
Are domestic rivals keep missing the boat imo, and they need to start taking more risks against each other. This way the British fans find out who's number 1 in each division, and the fighters get some respect for taking the big domestic risks (not to mention some £££). How the hell are any of are fighter's gonna get a proper world title shot, when their not even sorting things out on their own doorstep? yeah respect to Booth and Robinson. Hope kelly and Culshaw take note.
Posted: 06 Mar 2004, 09:18
by steve689
Hare still has a good future at domestic level even if his "world" title aspirations don't fully materialise, it's a shame fighrs with Sinclair and Khaliq cannot be made, yet again Boxing politics robs us of meaningful matchups.