Page 1 of 2

Interview with the 'Dutch Sonny Liston'

Posted: 09 Mar 2004, 17:55
by kevin
Exclusive interview with Hersisia at http://www.britishboxing.net

Re: Interview with the 'Dutch Sonny Liston'

Posted: 09 Mar 2004, 18:05
by bennie
Kevin wrote:Exclusive interview with Hersisia at http://www.britishboxing.net
Nice one, Kev. This fight is going to explode on the websites next week and you've got there first.

Posted: 09 Mar 2004, 18:11
by kevin
Thanks Bennie.

I hear from Audley's website he is going to be in Watford on Saturday, may take a trip to see!

Kev

Posted: 09 Mar 2004, 18:41
by Lightweight
Shroeder was great. He said some funny things that, after a good deal of thought, I took out of the interview.

The fact that He also ,told me there will be no more interviews is great for BBN too. :D :D :D

Posted: 09 Mar 2004, 18:54
by MightyWarrior
Nice exclusive there Kev. Even his trainer doesn't sound too confident. Audley has been sooooo cautious is his matchmaking so far, you'd think he's seen this guy and doesn't rate him too highly.
He's probably more Floyd Paterson than Sonny Liston in the chin department.
Another blow out for Big Aud I reckon.

There was a good example of the bullshit these tin-pot titles generate when the London Metro ran an interview with Hersisia.
The reporter was amazed when Hersisia admitted he wasn't the real heavyweight champion of the world.
The Metro actualy thought Audley was going for the legit world title! :roll:

Posted: 10 Mar 2004, 09:34
by Matchfixer
MightyWarrior wrote:
The Metro actualy thought Audley was going for the legit world title! :roll:
Yawn. This comment is well past its use by date.

Posted: 10 Mar 2004, 10:18
by Kilburn
MightyWarrior wrote:There was a good example of the bullshit these tin-pot titles generate when the London Metro ran an interview with Hersisia.
The reporter was amazed when Hersisia admitted he wasn't the real heavyweight champion of the world.
The Metro actualy thought Audley was going for the legit world title! :roll:
Yeah it does worry me how this "title fight" is going to be presented to the public. Sure we had Inverdale talking very sarcasticly about the validity of the WBF belt when the match was first announced but still, those words "World Heavyweight Championship" are very powerful.

Audley better not be looking to gain any respect from this.

Posted: 10 Mar 2004, 16:10
by Matchfixer
Kilburn wrote:
MightyWarrior wrote: The Metro actualy thought Audley was going for the legit world title! :roll:
Audley better not be looking to gain any respect from this.
Been there done that! He won't be.

Audley explained this is a stepping stone to greater things and hopes it will enable him to make better matches.

This has been clarified already. Please, no more!

Posted: 10 Mar 2004, 16:15
by jameswilson
I think if the guy didnt have the title he would still fight him. He is ranked above Aud in the European rankings which is the title Aud is really after.

Posted: 10 Mar 2004, 16:16
by REAL_DEAL
good interview and find, any audley fight not involving a brit would probably get bad press

Posted: 10 Mar 2004, 18:03
by MightyWarrior
I don't mind the fight, it could be a good one and I'll be watching it.
But to bill it as a world title is just slapstick comedy, whatever Aud says about it just being a stepping stone.
Better if they called it something like The Tescos Heavyweight Championship ( THC ) that way the press and public won't get too confused.

Posted: 11 Mar 2004, 08:01
by Kilburn
Good idea MW that would be much more suitable.

Whatever Matchfixer would like to believe about Harrisons motives for this fight, there are going to be a lot of people afterwards who aren't up to speed with boxing that will assume they've just watched a world heavyweight title fight. That means world class fighters. That means the best boxing has to offer.

It's a sad state of affairs.

Posted: 11 Mar 2004, 08:13
by dondada
Kilburn, you are totally right. Because most of us on this forum are hardcore boxing fans, it is hard for us to judge how these things are received by the general public/sports fan. When the announcer says it's for the (enter initials here) WORLD title, why wouldn't a casual fan assume it's the two best fighters on the planet in the ring?

Then they might end up watching a farce, demeaning the sport in their eyes and understandably so. It's maddening for us.

Posted: 11 Mar 2004, 08:14
by JimStone
You're on the money there, Kilburn.

The average man on the street will think Audley's a WORLD CHAMPION when he beats Hershia. The alphabet titles used to wind me up, but I've given over caring these days, if people are willing to have the wool pulled over their eyes, more fool them.

Posted: 11 Mar 2004, 08:22
by Kilburn
Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:When the announcer says it's for the (enter initials here) WORLD title
At least we won't have to endure John McDonald yelling "And the NEW.. WBF CHAMPION OF THE WOOOOORLD.."

Mike Goodhall is far less enthusiastic, which is a blessing in this case.

Posted: 11 Mar 2004, 08:24
by JimStone
Mike Goodhall will get the names wrong, title wrong, record wrong, day wrong, sport wrong ad infinitum.... he's a right numb bugger.

Posted: 11 Mar 2004, 08:25
by kevin
Where do you guys rate the WBF Crown in ABC world?

Kev

Posted: 11 Mar 2004, 08:35
by Kilburn
FlawedGenius wrote:Mike Goodhall will get the names wrong, title wrong, record wrong, day wrong, sport wrong ad infinitum.... he's a right numb bugger.
lol yeah poor old Mike is really cocking things up these days.

Posted: 11 Mar 2004, 08:47
by Kilburn
Kevin wrote:Where do you guys rate the WBF Crown in ABC world?

Kev
It's got to be one of the worst there is surely. Damon Hague and Carl Greaves as world champions? I have no doubt they are two cracking fellas but really...

Posted: 11 Mar 2004, 09:16
by MightyWarrior
Kevin wrote:Where do you guys rate the WBF Crown in ABC world?

Kev
I wouldn't rate them, just lump them in with all the other phony titles floating around.
There's the top four, then the rest. Whichever one is worse varies, depending on who can offer up the poorest "world" title fight each week.
Which is a close run thing.

BTW - I was mistaken saying it was Heresisia being interviewed in the Metro. It was acutaly Audley

Metro: Will you get a bigger break because this is the World Title?
AH: Unfortunately, there's no time to rest on my laurels. It's like with the Olympics - I came back and launched straight into my professional career. I'll be able to rest when I become the legitimate heavyweight champion of the world, once I am the best heavyweight out there. In truth, there's no genuine rest until I'm retired - you've got to keep your eyes on the prize in this game.

Metro: You say legitimate world champ. Does that mean you think the WBF title is a lesser belt?
AH: There's no doubt about it. I'm not devaluing it, it's a world title and my opponent is undefeated but he's not regarded as the best heavyweight champion in the world bar none. So if I beat him, I won't be known as the best heavyweight boxer out there. I'm going to use the title to move myself further up the rankings, and put myself in a position where I can challenge the best Americans.

Metro: Does the politics confuse you as much as it confuses me?
AH: No, I understand it, but I think boxing sometimes shoots itself in the foot by not explaining things properly. If it's explained properly, then people say: 'All well and good.' I'm fighting for a version of the world title. I'm not saying I'm number one now, but it's a version with one governing body, like the Champions League with one body or the FA Cup with another. But, at some point, Arsenal and Manchester United will clash. And at some point, Audley Harrison will be fighting whoever the number one American - or Ukrainian - is in the next 12 months.

Posted: 11 Mar 2004, 09:21
by Kilburn
Cool, that must mean that Audley will be taking the microphone after the ring introductions to explain to the crowd and everyone watching at home that this is not in fact a fight for the heavyweight championship of the world, it's a fight for.. er...

Posted: 11 Mar 2004, 10:13
by J
Kilburn wrote:Cool, that must mean that Audley will be taking the microphone after the ring introductions to explain to the crowd and everyone watching at home that this is not in fact a fight for the heavyweight championship of the world, it's a fight for.. er...
to be fair Aud has stated this isnt a "real world " title.

Posted: 11 Mar 2004, 10:36
by Kilburn
J wrote:to be fair Aud has stated this isnt a "real world " title.
So why is he fighting for it?

He makes me laugh. He goes on about how "boxing shoots itself in the foot by not explaining things to the fans" but surely he needs the ignorance of the fans in order to get away with this charade? Otherwise why on earth is he bothering with this title when it will not increase his true boxing standing one iota?

Posted: 11 Mar 2004, 10:40
by kevin
Kilburn, who do you see as viable opponents for Audley at this stage in his career?

If he wins this one, who would you like to see him in with next?

Kev
http://www.britishboxing.net

Posted: 11 Mar 2004, 10:43
by J
Kilburn wrote:
J wrote:to be fair Aud has stated this isnt a "real world " title.
So why is he fighting for it?

He makes me laugh. He goes on about how "boxing shoots itself in the foot by not explaining things to the fans" but surely he needs the ignorance of the fans in order to get away with this charade? Otherwise why on earth is he bothering with this title when it will not increase his true boxing standing one iota?

As a stepping stone? He hasnt got that many options warren as we know is full of shit and has been an Aud knocker, so he wont fight any of the brit heavies due to politics Tv rights etc, so that door is closed to him so he is using it as a lever to bigger and better things?

Bit idealistic but possible dont you think?
All I know is I said if he states he is a world champ (which he hasnt as yet) I will slate him badly and I know he hasnt and has said its as a stepping stone, so he has my full suppport. Not that that means anything. 8)