BoxRec

Nathan has sparred a few rounds against Kayode at the wildcard.

“You want guys like that at your gym,” Roach said about Cleverly.

“I wouldn’t hesitate to take him on, he’s definitely talented.

“We haven’t discussed him coming here yet but he’s here, and maybe there’s a reason why he is here.

“I think he is at the right stage where a unification fight would be good for him and he has the potential to beat any of the world champions.

“It is a very competitive division right now – there are some good fights out there for him.

“He’s a great boxer but his punching power is not the best in the world.

“He still has a little bit of an immature style of scoring points and getting out of the way, but sometimes you have to take more chances.

“The passive defence gives you a good defence but you can’t slip in a counter punch, that is the best way to knock out guys as you can take advantage of your opponent’s mistakes.”

Read More http://www.walesonline.co.uk/sports/box ... z2BeTe1qTT

I'd like to see Cleverly move trainers. No disrespect to his Dad but I think he could do with going to a world renowned trainer. No necessarily Roach but someone who can develop him further.

can any1 with a better knowledge on the technical side of the sport explain to me what the "passive defence" is? What does roach mean by that? I always thought nathans weakness was a bit of a shoddy defence myself, I thought he did actually take quite a few risks going to war when he doesnt need to.

stevieb_8006 wrote:can any1 with a better knowledge on the technical side of the sport explain to me what the "passive defence" is? What does roach mean by that? I always thought nathans weakness was a bit of a shoddy defence myself, I thought he did actually take quite a few risks going to war when he doesnt need to.

I'd imagine he means that he doesn't defend himself in a way that he can counter correctly.
Accepting attack without proper resistance.

Final round wrote:

stevieb_8006 wrote:can any1 with a better knowledge on the technical side of the sport explain to me what the "passive defence" is? What does roach mean by that? I always thought nathans weakness was a bit of a shoddy defence myself, I thought he did actually take quite a few risks going to war when he doesnt need to.

I'd imagine he means that he doesn't defend himself in a way that he can counter correctly.
Accepting attack without proper resistance.

This. Best example is experienced journeymen who will always last the distance against a prospect because they are happy to focus purely on defence at the expense of any offensive output.
Duran's an example of the opposite - under-rated defence, but he was actually incredibly adept at slipping punches on the way in while constantly looking to unload.

Yes, inaffected cross armed defence ala Nobby Nobbs is a passive defence.

Arthur Abraham is a classic example of a passive defence at world level.

Deserter wrote:

Final round wrote:

stevieb_8006 wrote:can any1 with a better knowledge on the technical side of the sport explain to me what the "passive defence" is? What does roach mean by that? I always thought nathans weakness was a bit of a shoddy defence myself, I thought he did actually take quite a few risks going to war when he doesnt need to.

I'd imagine he means that he doesn't defend himself in a way that he can counter correctly.
Accepting attack without proper resistance.

This. Best example is experienced journeymen who will always last the distance against a prospect because they are happy to focus purely on defence at the expense of any offensive output.
Duran's an example of the opposite - under-rated defence, but he was actually incredibly adept at slipping punches on the way in while constantly looking to unload.

Yeah Duran was a master

Abraham is the right guy to look at if wanting to no what that means

Cheers fellas, so a negative attitude rather than making them miss and then making them pay. Like blocking shots rather than parrying/evading and then returning fire.

Watch Marlon Starling fights to see how to do that type of defense correctly.

stevieb_8006 wrote:Cheers fellas, so a negative attitude rather than making them miss and then making them pay. Like blocking shots rather than parrying/evading and then returning fire.

Exactly mate