Page 1 of 1

James Butler v Richard Grant - sucker punch

Posted: 29 Nov 2012, 07:16
by Mimmy
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BI3D7h5yxOs

Im sure lots have seen this but it was my first viewing. Reading the story that evolved afterwards and Butler killed Sam Kellerman. You know the commentator in Rocky Balboa Max Kellerman, is there any relation there, maybe father?

Re: James Butler v Richard Grant - sucker punch

Posted: 29 Nov 2012, 07:18
by kevo
Brothers I believe

Re: James Butler v Richard Grant - sucker punch

Posted: 29 Nov 2012, 07:22
by orbtastic
Yup.

Ironic because his nickname was the Harlem hammer and he killed him with a hammer.

Re: James Butler v Richard Grant - sucker punch

Posted: 29 Nov 2012, 07:24
by kevo
orbtastic wrote:Yup.

Ironic because his nickname was the Harlem hammer and he killed him with a hammer.
In Harlem?

Re: James Butler v Richard Grant - sucker punch

Posted: 29 Nov 2012, 07:24
by kevo
orbtastic wrote:Yup.

Ironic because his nickname was the Harlem hammer and he killed him with a hammer.
In Harlem?

Re: James Butler v Richard Grant - sucker punch

Posted: 29 Nov 2012, 07:31
by thepocketrocket
Since Butler only got 29 years, does that mean he will be eligible for parole after around 15? Or do you serve the full 29?

Re: James Butler v Richard Grant - sucker punch

Posted: 29 Nov 2012, 08:18
by polecateddy
No dude, it's America. No getting out halfway! He killed the guy and then burnt the house down to try and disguise the crime. Basically don't invite a head-case to live with you, and then expect him not to bludgeon you to death when you want to kick him out. There's a moral there somewhere!

Re: James Butler v Richard Grant - sucker punch

Posted: 29 Nov 2012, 08:22
by thepocketrocket
polecateddy wrote:No dude, it's America. No getting out halfway! He killed the guy and then burnt the house down to try and disguise the crime. Basically don't invite a head-case to live with you, and then expect him not to bludgeon you to death when you want to kick him out. There's a moral there somewhere!
:lol:

Re: James Butler v Richard Grant - sucker punch

Posted: 29 Nov 2012, 08:30
by thepocketrocket
I read an excellent article post Grant but pre Kellerman. It was in either BM or BN.

The article spoke about how it had become cool to not just beat your opponent, but demean him as well. The idea was that at some point, someone was going to land on somebody after the fight due to the fact they were being humiliated.

Re: James Butler v Richard Grant - sucker punch

Posted: 29 Nov 2012, 14:04
by Tomasino
What a disgusting man Butler is, horrible move to pull.

It shows how much a good boxer can negate the power in a punch if he knows its coming or expects it. Getting hit by a sucker punch like that does so much damage. It's how a lot of pub bullies get their rep up, by breaking folks faces with a sly dig.

Re: James Butler v Richard Grant - sucker punch

Posted: 29 Nov 2012, 16:44
by polecateddy
From memory Grant was more than just knocked out, he sustained a badly broken jaw. Not very fresh!

Re: James Butler v Richard Grant - sucker punch

Posted: 29 Nov 2012, 17:00
by Bobbyptsd
polecateddy wrote:From memory Grant was more than just knocked out, he sustained a badly broken jaw. Not very fresh!
I don't remember him being knocked out, but it's been awhile since I saw it, I could be wrong.

But yeah, his mouth/jaw were pretty fvcked, from what I recall.

Re: James Butler v Richard Grant - sucker punch

Posted: 29 Nov 2012, 18:26
by matko
Bobbyptsd wrote:
polecateddy wrote:From memory Grant was more than just knocked out, he sustained a badly broken jaw. Not very fresh!
I don't remember him being knocked out, but it's been awhile since I saw it, I could be wrong.

But yeah, his mouth/jaw were pretty fvcked, from what I recall.
It was brutal and the show was filled by Police/ firemen who was doing it to raise money for 9/11 I'm sure He was arrested at the venue by the police spectating was a cruel sucker punch his jaw was badly damaged

Re: James Butler v Richard Grant - sucker punch

Posted: 30 Nov 2012, 03:43
by polecateddy
Tongue injury, 26 stitches, and his jaw was only temporarily dislocated.

Re: James Butler v Richard Grant - sucker punch

Posted: 30 Nov 2012, 04:06
by Old bones Ian
Tomasino wrote:What a disgusting man Butler is, horrible move to pull.

It shows how much a good boxer can negate the power in a punch if he knows its coming or expects it. Getting hit by a sucker punch like that does so much damage. It's how a lot of pub bullies get their rep up, by breaking folks faces with a sly dig.
Very true, i've seen it happen a few times, and usually the bully only goes for someone they know they can beat, but still they sucker punch them.

Re: James Butler v Richard Grant - sucker punch

Posted: 30 Nov 2012, 05:56
by dberry
matko wrote: It was brutal and the show was filled by Police/ firemen who was doing it to raise money for 9/11 I'm sure He was arrested at the
Yeah, in front of a crowd of coppers and emergency service personnel, what a dickhead. I believe he was arrested at the venue by off duty cops watching the fight, his purse was forfeited, fight licence was cancelled and he was subsequently sentenced to a stint inside.

Re: James Butler v Richard Grant - sucker punch

Posted: 30 Nov 2012, 13:53
by DIRT SUGAR
Then he went and moidered the wrong Kellerman :doh:

Re: James Butler v Richard Grant - sucker punch

Posted: 30 Nov 2012, 20:22
by Bobbyptsd
DIRT SUGAR wrote:Then he went and moidered the wrong Kellerman :doh:
I think it's worth pointing out that that isn't really funny at all.

Re: James Butler v Richard Grant - sucker punch

Posted: 30 Nov 2012, 20:26
by dberry
No quite tragic really. Would it be sick and twisted to say thaqt both Kellerman brothers go "bang bang ......bang bang bang........bang bang ?