Page 1 of 2
murphy will regain title
Posted: 16 Mar 2004, 05:14
by dmcneil
lawrence murphy will destroy farnell in a rematch
Re: murphy will regain title
Posted: 16 Mar 2004, 05:36
by REAL_DEAL
dmcneil wrote:lawrence murphy will destroy farnell in a rematch
thanks for the info
Posted: 16 Mar 2004, 05:59
by dondada
Based on what? He looked like a total novice and got totally 'mullahed' as Nige Benn would have put it.
Posted: 16 Mar 2004, 06:23
by J
yeah it wasnt a very close fight was it. On what evidence do you base this, as far as everyone can make out Elcock walked on to a peach of a punch whioch looks a bit lucky in retrospect.
Posted: 16 Mar 2004, 06:52
by bigynzing
Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:Based on what? He looked like a total novice and got totally 'mullahed' as Nige Benn would have put it.
..........and i always thought it was spelled mullerd

Posted: 16 Mar 2004, 07:06
by mickeybeard
bigynzing wrote:Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:Based on what? He looked like a total novice and got totally 'mullahed' as Nige Benn would have put it.
..........and i always thought it was spelled mullerd

It's slang. You can get away with either, it's not like Mr Collins or Mr Oxford are going to ask you to 'step outside' about it.
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
I always use mullered, so if you're wrong, you've got company.
And Murphy needs to go back down a few levels and come up slowly, if he's going to come up at all. I can't see anything but Farnell 'mullering' him again in an immediate rematch.
Posted: 16 Mar 2004, 08:08
by Dynamite Dean Phillips
Murphy got lucky, but his luck has been shortlived. Simple as that.
Those overhand rights he was caught with in the Farnell fight were textbook shots that shouldn't have landed at that rate at that level in professonal boxing.
Re: murphy will regain title
Posted: 16 Mar 2004, 09:14
by steve689
dmcneil wrote:lawrence murphy will destroy farnell in a rematch
And this is only his first post

Posted: 16 Mar 2004, 09:37
by jamesmcdonnell
I believe the term mullered refers back to that German footballer, Gerhard Muller?
There seems to be no definitive explanation I can find though.
Posted: 16 Mar 2004, 09:47
by steve689
Yes your spot on James, it is.
Posted: 16 Mar 2004, 09:56
by stujones
jamesmcdonnell wrote:I believe the term mullered refers back to that German footballer, Gerhard Muller?
There seems to be no definitive explanation I can find though.
No idea, I think you are correct - is Gerhard Muller the same as Gerd Muller of the 70's?
If yes, then it probably has as some connection with the 1970 world cup quarter final when Muller basically "Mullard" England.
Posted: 16 Mar 2004, 10:07
by steve richards
Dynamite Dean Phillips wrote:Murphy got lucky, but his luck has been shortlived. Simple as that.
Those overhand rights he was caught with in the Farnell fight were textbook shots that shouldn't have landed at that rate at that level in professonal boxing.
Spot on Dean, I was there when he ko'd elcock and to be fair he caught elcock on the spot with a lucky punch, elcock will fight murphy next then the winner will fight the winner of farnell vs Lockett. I think Murphy proved he isnt the greatest thing to come out of Scotland

Posted: 16 Mar 2004, 10:16
by mickeybeard
jamesmcdonnell wrote:I believe the term mullered refers back to that German footballer, Gerhard Muller?
There seems to be no definitive explanation I can find though.
Maybe. Some people think it comes from the whole 80's Mad Mullah thing, so mullahed would mean wrecked in terms of blown-up. Don't suppose it matters one way or the other really. Certainly don't suppose it mattered to the fighters that Benn mullered... Or mullahed.

Posted: 16 Mar 2004, 10:22
by jamesmcdonnell
Gerd is I think a more colloquial form of Gerhard.....
I said all along that the shot Murphy landed was a lucky shot, if you watch in slow motion, it's part of a pretty ineffectual looking 4 punch combo, which were all arm shots, it was the third shot I think, and you see Murphy throw the final punch, and then a look of surprise that Elcock has gone down. He knew that it wasn't solid enough to provoke that kind of drastic reaction normally.
Those sort of shots aren't planned, had it landed anywhere but the temple it would have been shrugged off.
This is no disrespect to Murphy, but that was a lucky punch, and flattered to deceive. His shortcoming and lack of experience were brutally exposed by Farnell, and I don't see how the outcome could be any different in a rematch.
Posted: 16 Mar 2004, 10:28
by kevin
Isn't Gerd Muller now an MC in Germany.. Seen him a few times
on Eurosport
Kev
http://www.britishboxing.net
Posted: 16 Mar 2004, 10:43
by dondada
Ah, the joys of eytmology!
http://phrases.shu.ac.uk/bulletin_board ... s/796.html
I think their 'mulled wine' theory is pushing it a bit!
Another potential derivative - looking totally fucked as in 'Arthur Mullard'! Anyone remember him? I spelled it that way because I think that's the way it appears in Benn's autobiography.
Posted: 16 Mar 2004, 10:48
by glittermonkey
Kevin wrote:Isn't Gerd Muller now an MC in Germany.. Seen him a few times on Eurosport
I think Gerd works for Bayern Munich in some capacity. Not sure though.
Posted: 16 Mar 2004, 10:58
by dmcneil
the reason for this being was that Farnell burst his eardrum early on
Posted: 16 Mar 2004, 11:01
by J
dmcneil wrote:the reason for this being was that Farnell burst his eardrum early on
Sorry to be sarcastic but how did he do that, practising his trumpet too loudly? NO by punching him in it!
I could understand that theory if he had lost on a decision with the balance issues that go with an injury like that but not over the massacre that occured the other night. Sorry mate but still cant see a different outcome.
Posted: 16 Mar 2004, 11:10
by Twinkle Toes
Why is it the Scottish never take defeat too well.
Be passionate about your countrymen, but ffs please dont be deluded :)
Posted: 16 Mar 2004, 13:11
by jamesmcdonnell
I am wondering whether we have Murphy himself on this forum.....
Posted: 16 Mar 2004, 13:22
by KOJOE90
Murphy seems like a nice guy, but like I've said on another thread it may be a long road back to the top for him, due to his decisive lose to Farnell who with the greatest of respect made Murphy look like a novice.
Posted: 16 Mar 2004, 13:24
by MightyWarrior
dmcneil wrote:the reason for this being was that Farnell burst his eardrum early on
He kept landing on his ear, so I'm not surprised it burst.
Posted: 16 Mar 2004, 13:25
by JimStone
Some of you wordsmiths are way out with your predictions on where the word "mullered" comes from (German sportsman
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
).
It is infact a Romany word that means "Dead". Many Cockneys adopted certain Romany words such as: cushty, mullered, chavvy etc etc...
Posted: 16 Mar 2004, 13:31
by JimStone
Also the spelling is irrelevant as it is just phonetics, there is no Romany dictionary.