Anthony Ogogo signed with Golden Boy Promotions
Posted: 27 Dec 2012, 13:52
Leon Williams is a bum period!joelouis1234 wrote:Are you referring to the two 'out of shape Latvians' Arturs Kulikauskis who beat Leon Williams recently or Andrejs Loginovs who beat Dan Blackwell in March? Is being 'out of shape' unique to Latvian boxers?bengulnaci1 wrote:Well, at least he will be matched pretty well. No out of shape Latvians, no hopers, fighters coming up in weight, powder puff punchers, false hype etc, for him.
You never know, with the schooling he will recieve, he might actually get better insted having no improvement as is the norm with prospects who sign with the 'Big' alleged promoters over here.
Tough choice, but a good one. He is a ballsy kid no doubt, and that counts for a lot.
Then he knows about boxing then.hurlock wrote:Schaefer does not have a clue about boxing or boxers!
Golden boy has never honed any talent.
They basically seal the deal & do the deed
keithmoonhangover wrote:Then he knows about boxing then.hurlock wrote:Schaefer does not have a clue about boxing or boxers!
Golden boy has never honed any talent.
They basically seal the deal & do the deed
Guilty as charged, Spoilerboy it is.hurlock wrote:Back off spoiler boyDD
The guy is a businessman & does not understand the sport one iota.
They do have prospects, but they also do the smart thing.... let someone hone the talent and then sign them.hurlock wrote:The business yes!
When or who was there last honed talent??
Victor Ortiz??
'Latvian' was the 1st thing that came into my head and in hindsight, Eastern European would have been a much more accurate description. So I apologies if this offended anyone.joelouis1234 wrote:With regards to the 'out of shape' Latvian stereotype I think the main issue lies with certain 'out of date' Promoters who constantly insist on bringing over Eastern Europeans and foreigners in general who have the worst records going in order to get an almost guaranteed win for their ticket sellers thus depriving the paying public out of their hard earning cash and subjecting them to predictable,boring,repetitive one sided fights in which everyone knows who the winner is going to be.For the record there are plenty of 'in shape and very live opponents' from Eastern Europe in particular who are being kept out of boxing in the UK by boring Promoters only interested in making money at the expense of featuring 'real 50/50 fights' Instead of harping on and on about 'out of shape fat Latvians' maybe better to start demanding that Promoters start bringing over Eastern European and other foreign boxers who are being kept out in the cold because they can actually fight! Steve Goodwin is the only Promoter out there that actually does this at the moment.
Why are they more challenging over there? Bigger pool to choose from ?polecateddy wrote:Tough matches over in America though. The journeymen there are a more fearsome breed than in the UK ...I am presuming here he'll be based in America a lot?!
It may be becuase the refs don`t stop it after a three punch slap flurry. Over there you have to actually finish your opponent off. Only a goo dthing for a prospect to be honest. No point going through your early career thinking all you have to do to get the win is to throw a few combinations.Final round wrote:Why are they more challenging over there? Bigger pool to choose from ?polecateddy wrote:Tough matches over in America though. The journeymen there are a more fearsome breed than in the UK ...I am presuming here he'll be based in America a lot?!
I can remember Manny Steward being very dismissive of a lot of British fighters, implying that they were generally a bit soft and far more likely to wilt psychologically when things got brutal than their American counterparts are. He was definitely surprised, for instance, by John Murray's fortitude against Rios and said as much in commentary. There's probably some truth in what he says, there are plenty of tomato cans in the States who are even more inept than some of the bums knocking around the UK, but the guys who breakthrough are almost always the product of seriously intense sparring and often amateur careers of 100 fights plus. The Yanks definitely throw a lot of eggs at the walls and most of the break. Truly survival of the fittest.Final round wrote:Why are they more challenging over there? Bigger pool to choose from ?polecateddy wrote:Tough matches over in America though. The journeymen there are a more fearsome breed than in the UK ...I am presuming here he'll be based in America a lot?!
Lockett, Jennings, Hunter, recent history is littered with British fighters shown up to be way, way out of their depth when stepping up to title class and proceed to pretty much end their careers afterwards. Having the one off tough fights against the likes of Rhodes, Pryce and Pickering did nothing to prepare them for the step up in classJLP wrote:I can remember Manny Steward being very dismissive of a lot of British fighters, implying that they were generally a bit soft and far more likely to wilt psychologically when things got brutal than their American counterparts are. He was definitely surprised, for instance, by John Murray's fortitude against Rios and said as much in commentary. There's probably some truth in what he says, there are plenty of tomato cans in the States who are even more inept than some of the bums knocking around the UK, but the guys who breakthrough are almost always the product of seriously intense sparring and often amateur careers of 100 fights plus. The Yanks definitely throw a lot of eggs at the walls and most of the break. Truly survival of the fittest.Final round wrote:Why are they more challenging over there? Bigger pool to choose from ?polecateddy wrote:Tough matches over in America though. The journeymen there are a more fearsome breed than in the UK ...I am presuming here he'll be based in America a lot?!
In the UK, fighters frequently get on television, build large followings and get manoeuvred into title fights when they're not actually that hard or that good, compared to Americans given the same level of exposure.
JLP wrote:I can remember Manny Steward being very dismissive of a lot of British fighters, implying that they were generally a bit soft and far more likely to wilt psychologically when things got brutal than their American counterparts are. He was definitely surprised, for instance, by John Murray's fortitude against Rios and said as much in commentary. There's probably some truth in what he says, there are plenty of tomato cans in the States who are even more inept than some of the bums knocking around the UK, but the guys who breakthrough are almost always the product of seriously intense sparring and often amateur careers of 100 fights plus. The Yanks definitely throw a lot of eggs at the walls and most of the break. Truly survival of the fittest.Final round wrote:Why are they more challenging over there? Bigger pool to choose from ?polecateddy wrote:Tough matches over in America though. The journeymen there are a more fearsome breed than in the UK ...I am presuming here he'll be based in America a lot?!
In the UK, fighters frequently get on television, build large followings and get manoeuvred into title fights when they're not actually that hard or that good, compared to Americans given the same level of exposure.