Eijiro Murata v. Toshiaki Nishioka at bantamweight.
Posted: 14 Jan 2013, 20:12
Two Japanese fighters who came up just short at bantam. Nishioka then won a title at super bantam, but this is at bantam. Thoughts?
Agreed.Cutman Scabbers wrote:Murata, no doubt whatsoever.
He faced much tougher competition overall, with better results.
I thought he beat Lupe Pintor and should have got the decision.
Rover wrote:Agreed.Cutman Scabbers wrote:Murata, no doubt whatsoever.
He faced much tougher competition overall, with better results.
I thought he beat Lupe Pintor and should have got the decision.
Murata/Sahaprom would've been very good. Murata no doubt fought in the best bantam era of the last 30+ years; he'd have been a champ in another era.
They'd both have beaten him, Jeff doing it easier.Cutman Scabbers wrote:Rover wrote:Agreed.Cutman Scabbers wrote:Murata, no doubt whatsoever.
He faced much tougher competition overall, with better results.
I thought he beat Lupe Pintor and should have got the decision.
Murata/Sahaprom would've been very good. Murata no doubt fought in the best bantam era of the last 30+ years; he'd have been a champ in another era.
And how would Nishioka have fared against Pintor and Jeff Chandler?
Jeff.Cutman Scabbers wrote:Agreed.
Hasegawa vs. Pintor?
Hasegawa vs. Chandler?
Pintor and Jeff again.Cutman Scabbers wrote:Ok...
Tatsuyoshi vs. Pintor?
Tatsuyoshi vs. Chandler?
Looking back, Nishioka faced Veeraphol 4x in a great rivalry - withstood tremendous punishment and ageing battles with Nakajima (a fight his promoter made to encourage his retirement) and Napopol - to go on and win a title at his fifth try and beat Johnny Gonzalez in Mexico & Rafael Marquez in America. Not bad opposition and results.Cutman Scabbers wrote:Murata, no doubt whatsoever.
He faced much tougher competition overall, with better results.
I thought he beat Lupe Pintor and should have got the decision.
Of course Nishioka was impressive at super bantam, but the question is "at bantamweight,"Autobarn wrote:Looking back, Nishioka faced Veeraphol 4x in a great rivalry - withstood tremendous punishment and ageing battles with Nakajima (a fight his promoter made to encourage his retirement) and Napopol - to go on and win a title at his fifth try and beat Johnny Gonzalez in Mexico & Rafael Marquez in America. Not bad opposition and results.Cutman Scabbers wrote:Murata, no doubt whatsoever.
He faced much tougher competition overall, with better results.
I thought he beat Lupe Pintor and should have got the decision.
I'd not write offNishioka vs any of the fighters from 118-122 in recent Asian boxing history.
Autobarn wrote:Yeah, that's cool.
Sahaprom was a very impressive bantam. Extremely well rounded, mature and hard hitting. In some ways Nishioka was at his best, in the middle two fights, at least in terms of hand speed and combination punching which were largely absent at super bantamweight. (Where I felt he was a bit of a "one-armed bandit")
Nishioka was such a determined little guy, to come through that brutal rivalry of four fights, and some injuries, to use his grit and experience for a very good championship reign albeit four pounds up.
Looking forward to watching some Murata very soon. Which of the Chandler fights is the best?