Jake Carr, Star in the making?
Posted: 21 Feb 2013, 05:56
Watching Jake Carr at the moment, what do others think?
Certainly talent and skill.
Certainly talent and skill.
Da Voice wrote:e.g. Matt Te Paa vs. Shannon McMahon in 2006. No knockdowns in it...but?
referee: Jim Boland | judge: Ignatius Missai
lidis 48-60 | judge: Aneeka Williams 54-60 | judge: Wayne Ashdown 53-60
At the time, I had numerous messages from fellow editors, asking me if I was on Coco Pops & Fruity Lexia when I inserted resultsDa Voice wrote:e.g. Matt Te Paa vs. Shannon McMahon in 2006. No knockdowns in it...but?
referee: Jim Boland | judge: Ignatius Missailidis 48-60 | judge: Aneeka Williams 54-60 | judge: Wayne Ashdown 53-60
Hey hey, leave The Howard alone.Sweet P wrote:My bet is Howard fucked up. Should read 59-55. He has stuffed up all night.
Allen didn't win a round, but Ignatius can be a bit..........,well.....different. In fairness to allen, after a poor start and ordinary first couple of rounds, and being out classed by Carr, he came back into the fight somewhat and was competitive enough to prove the fight wasn't a mismatch.Sweet P wrote:Da Voice wrote:e.g. Matt Te Paa vs. Shannon McMahon in 2006. No knockdowns in it...but?
referee: Jim Boland | judge: Ignatius Missai
lidis 48-60 | judge: Aneeka Williams 54-60 | judge: Wayne Ashdown 53-60
That is interesting scoring. Maybe it was 59-53. I struggle to see how he got that score though. Allan didnt win a round.
That scoring reminds me of the scoring for Klitschko-Rahman, a bout in which there was one knockdown. I imagine that Missalidis and Cavelieri have very low thresholds for how one-sided a round must be to warrant scoring it 10-8 in the absence of a knockdown.Da Voice wrote:e.g. Matt Te Paa vs. Shannon McMahon in 2006. No knockdowns in it...but?
referee: Jim Boland | judge: Ignatius Missailidis 48-60 | judge: Aneeka Williams 54-60 | judge: Wayne Ashdown 53-60