Page 1 of 1
Terry Flannigan vs Nate Campbell
Posted: 17 Mar 2013, 15:45
by Horse
Former English super-featherweight champion Terry 'Turbo' Flanagan is preparing for the biggest night and fight of his life against former undisputed world lightweight champion Nate Campbell - For the WBC International light-welterweight title on the undercard of Amir Khan v Julio Diaz at the Motorpoint Arena in Sheffield on April 27.
Interesting fight.
http://www.britishboxers.co.uk/2013/03/ ... s.co.uk%29
Re: Terry Flannigan vs Nate Campbell
Posted: 17 Mar 2013, 15:50
by Londonirish
Great Good Luck Mate

Re: Terry Flannigan vs Nate Campbell
Posted: 17 Mar 2013, 15:58
by magnus
This is a massive step-up in more than one way, the lad was a super feather up to Prizefighter, and Campbell fought at Welter in his last fight. Kudos to Flannigan and team for the gamble.
Re: Terry Flannigan vs Nate Campbell
Posted: 17 Mar 2013, 17:58
by 15829
Can't see the board granting Campbell a licence
Re: Terry Flannigan vs Nate Campbell
Posted: 17 Mar 2013, 19:25
by Horse
@markmcgee87 wrote:Can't see the board granting Campbell a licence
The BBBofC should grant the licence and stop making it even harder for promoters during these difficult times.
Re: Terry Flannigan vs Nate Campbell
Posted: 19 Mar 2013, 12:41
by derry
Don't understand how they can fight at 9-11 but it's for a lightweight title what's the point in haven a lightweight title if you don't have to make weight ? And ideas anyone
Re: Terry Flannigan vs Nate Campbell
Posted: 19 Mar 2013, 12:43
by derry
On the interview says for light welter title but I read somewhere it was for the one tommy coyle will vacate
Re: Terry Flannigan vs Nate Campbell
Posted: 20 Mar 2013, 05:47
by pyenest77
Just an indications of how messed up & splintered boxing is these days!
Re: Terry Flannigan vs Nate Campbell
Posted: 27 Apr 2013, 04:40
by Bard of Boxrec
OK chaps, so what's the call on this one????
strange fight, I have never seen this Flannagan fellow but on cursory glance he seems to be a domestic-level weak punching guy, the question is how shot is Nate Campbell and is he shot enough to lose this? I mean I'm sure the answer must be yes, but has anyone seen Nate's last few fights? He does seem to have entered journeyman mode.
Re: Terry Flannigan vs Nate Campbell
Posted: 27 Apr 2013, 04:58
by loaded_gloves
I've seen Campbell losing over the last couple of years, he is done, his body is rebelling against him, if anyone has seen this lad and he's semi-competent he should outpoint the remains of Campbell.
Re: Terry Flannigan vs Nate Campbell
Posted: 27 Apr 2013, 05:01
by warriorbox
Is this just an undercard fight to help justify the ticket prices, or are Golden Boy interested in Flannigan?
Re: Terry Flannigan vs Nate Campbell
Posted: 27 Apr 2013, 20:02
by STEVE WOOD
Nate was outclassed for 4 rounds and decided not to come out for the 5th , great victory for Terry
Re: Terry Flannigan vs Nate Campbell
Posted: 28 Apr 2013, 02:38
by Andrew
Dissapointed in Nate Campbell for an ex world champion barely threw anything and his corner seemed to be giving no motivation at all.
I'll give Terry credit he looked good again boxing well at range and varying his shots. Personally I'd like to see him fight Anthony Crolla next.I think Crolla is a good guy but personally I think Terry will take him.
Re: Terry Flannigan vs Nate Campbell
Posted: 28 Apr 2013, 03:24
by billy nelson
Naandrew wrote:Dissapointed in Nate Campbell for an ex world champion barely threw anything and his corner seemed to be giving no motivation at all.
I'll give Terry credit he looked good again boxing well at range and varying his shots. Personally I'd like to see him fight Anthony Crolla next.I think Crolla is a good guy but personally I think Terry will take him.
Terry is more than capable of beating any LW in the UK except Mitchell,Rees and burns
Re: Terry Flannigan vs Nate Campbell
Posted: 28 Apr 2013, 04:48
by WayoftheCass
STEVE WOOD wrote:Nate was outclassed for 4 rounds and decided not to come out for the 5th , great victory for Terry
41 year old Nate Campbell gave nothing, was completely stationary and was telling his corner what to do. He threw the towel in after 4 one sided but hardly brutal rounds. Good name on Terry's record and some nice exposure but the fight taught him nothing and proved nothing. Let's call a spade a spade here....Campbell was a punching bag in a pathetic though not unpredictable display. Not Terry's fault but he would have gotten a tougher workout again a Latvian street sweeper.
Re: Terry Flannigan vs Nate Campbell
Posted: 28 Apr 2013, 11:43
by n1ebf
WayoftheCass wrote:STEVE WOOD wrote:Nate was outclassed for 4 rounds and decided not to come out for the 5th , great victory for Terry
41 year old Nate Campbell gave nothing, was completely stationary and was telling his corner what to do. He threw the towel in after 4 one sided but hardly brutal rounds. Good name on Terry's record and some nice exposure but the fight taught him nothing and proved nothing. Let's call a spade a spade here....Campbell was a punching bag in a pathetic though not unpredictable display. Not Terry's fault but he would have gotten a tougher workout again a Latvian street sweeper.
I agree with this. Campbell did nothing at all.
It was with some relief that Gary Sykes and John Kays put on such a super contest as the show was in need of being saved.
No disrespect to others - Bradley Pryce can still have a fight, good contest with Rick Goddings - hope I've got his name right there! Sykes Kays was a great battle. Nate Campbell didn't turn up - not Flannigan's fault, a win's a win.
Re: Terry Flannigan vs Nate Campbell
Posted: 29 Apr 2013, 04:16
by pyenest77
Poor & pointless matchmaking. Nobody benefits from this type of fight.
Re: Terry Flannigan vs Nate Campbell
Posted: 30 Apr 2013, 02:48
by STEVE WOOD
Pyenest ,
It was said to be good matching prior to the fight , shame Nate Cambell did not turn up but do not take away from the performance of Turbo.
Hind site is a wonderful thing but I'm afraid we do not have making matches.
STEVE WOOD
Re: Terry Flannigan vs Nate Campbell
Posted: 30 Apr 2013, 15:32
by magnus
pyenest77 wrote:Poor & pointless matchmaking. Nobody benefits from this type of fight.
Sorry mate, think you're being slightly wise after the event here. As I said above, this was quite a step up for Flannigan, they weren't to know that Campbell wasn't going to be arsed.
Re: Terry Flannigan vs Nate Campbell
Posted: 30 Apr 2013, 17:42
by Fortynineandout
Another big plus from this fight will be the significant jump in the rankings - up to 16 in the boxrec "World" rankings.
Perhaps not such a bad bit of matchmaking after all !
Well done Terry .