Narvaez/Morel at fly.
Posted: 17 Mar 2013, 16:52
These two were titlists at the same time; who takes it? I'd take Omar by decision.
None of those top flies fought each other, so who knows whose fault that was? They were from all over so could carve out their own little kingdoms.giacomino wrote:Narvaez by UD, something like 116-112, 115-113. Narvaez was and is an excellent boxer, as was Morel at 112, but IMO Narvaez was a little better. Close fight. Narvaez's management should be stoned for not finding a way to get him with the best at 112 in his prime. He should have fought Wongjamkam, Arce and Vic D at fly.
I sure wish the dumbass WBC would've forced Arce/Wonjongkam when both were defending a version of the title (PW the regular and Arce the interim).iamasadlittleboy wrote:Narvaez v Wonjongkam should have happened IMO, that was the fight.
It was retarded that that fight never happened. Although Arce was really strong at that weight, Wonjongkam was probably at or near his prime at the time. Super fight.Rover wrote:I sure wish the dumbass WBC would've forced Arce/Wonjongkam when both were defending a version of the title (PW the regular and Arce the interim).iamasadlittleboy wrote:Narvaez v Wonjongkam should have happened IMO, that was the fight.
Absolutely. Would've been a great PPV undercard fight if it had occurred in the U.S. There was no need for an "interim" WBC champ when PW was defending his title!giacomino wrote:It was retarded that that fight never happened. Although Arce was really strong at that weight, Wonjongkam was probably at or near his prime at the time. Super fight.Rover wrote:I sure wish the dumbass WBC would've forced Arce/Wonjongkam when both were defending a version of the title (PW the regular and Arce the interim).iamasadlittleboy wrote:Narvaez v Wonjongkam should have happened IMO, that was the fight.