BoxRec

Off hand the biggest I can think of is Minter v Antuofermo I with one judge having Minter winning by 12 while another had Antuofermo ahead by 2 for a total difference of 14 pts. For some reason I seem to recall one as bad or worse coming out of Japan in the lower weights, but I'll have to find it first.

1960-01-22 Sugar Ray Robinson L-SD15 Paul Pender
judge: Joe Santoro 147-138 | judge: John Norton 142-148

Pintor/Zarate was quite wide.
Or how about Mijares/Navarro where one judge had it 120-108 Navarro while the other two scored for Mijares.
Jones/Canizales was also huge.

It was an UD, but how about Czyz/O'Mara? One judge had it 100-71! Another had it 100-89.

Sanchez/Cowdell was also huge; how one judge had that fight for Cowdell is beyond me.

Kenny Keene v. Bobby Crabtree:
One judge had it 120-108 for Keene.
Another had it 119-111 for Crabtree.

Rover wrote:It was an UD, but how about Czyz/O'Mara? One judge had it 100-71! Another had it 100-89.

How the hell do you wind up with the 100-71 scorecard? Was he scoring rounds 10-5 or something?

gilgamesh wrote:

Rover wrote:It was an UD, but how about Czyz/O'Mara? One judge had it 100-71! Another had it 100-89.

How the hell do you wind up with the 100-71 scorecard? Was he scoring rounds 10-5 or something?

no it was an even fight until the tenth
he scored it 10-to negative 29
real bad round for o'mara


yeah no idea how you can score a fight like that

Seamus wrote:Off hand the biggest I can think of is Minter v Antuofermo I with one judge having Minter winning by 12 while another had Antuofermo ahead by 2 for a total difference of 14 pts. For some reason I seem to recall one as bad or worse coming out of Japan in the lower weights, but I'll have to find it first.

The British judge who scored it 149-137 (Roland Dankin) was accused of signally Minter's corner, if I remember correctly. He gave Antuofermo one round despite that fact that it was a close fight and Antuofermo was credited with a knockdown (although dubious).

One of the great Japanese scores was Katsushige Kawashima defending his belt in Japan vs Jose Navarro. Scores were 115-114, 115-113 for the local fighter, 120-109 for Navarro

One of the older fights I remember a big disparity in was in Venezuela in 1965, when Eddie Perkins defended against local star, Carlos Hernandez. Hernandez won a split decision, with two Venezuelan judges scoring it 146-142, 143-142 for the local guy and the great Henry Armstrong scoring it 150-139 for Perkins: a swing of 15 points.

Another 15-point swing came when Ki-Soo Kim, the guy who won a split decision vs Nino Benvenuti in South Korea to take his junior mw belt, got a split decision in 1967 defending against American Freddie Little in South Korea. Two South Korean judges scored it 72-68, 71-69 for Kim, and the American judge scored it 75-64 for Little.

Turns out both Pender vs Robinson bouts had huge discrepancies in the scoring. 15 in the first, 16 in the second.

gilgamesh wrote:

Rover wrote:It was an UD, but how about Czyz/O'Mara? One judge had it 100-71! Another had it 100-89.

How the hell do you wind up with the 100-71 scorecard? Was he scoring rounds 10-5 or something?

He scored a bunch of 10-7s, obviously, and there weren't any knockdowns even!

MEISINGER wrote:

gilgamesh wrote:

Rover wrote:It was an UD, but how about Czyz/O'Mara? One judge had it 100-71! Another had it 100-89.

How the hell do you wind up with the 100-71 scorecard? Was he scoring rounds 10-5 or something?

no it was an even fight until the tenth
he scored it 10-to negative 29
real bad round for o'mara


yeah no idea how you can score a fight like that

Actually, if it were even through 9, it would be 90-90, and -29 would reduce George's score to 61!
10--19 Czyz in the 10th!
:)

giacomino wrote:

Seamus wrote:Off hand the biggest I can think of is Minter v Antuofermo I with one judge having Minter winning by 12 while another had Antuofermo ahead by 2 for a total difference of 14 pts. For some reason I seem to recall one as bad or worse coming out of Japan in the lower weights, but I'll have to find it first.

The British judge who scored it 149-137 (Roland Dankin) was accused of signally Minter's corner, if I remember correctly. He gave Antuofermo one round despite that fact that it was a close fight and Antuofermo was credited with a knockdown (although dubious).

One of the great Japanese scores was Katsushige Kawashima defending his belt in Japan vs Jose Navarro. Scores were 115-114, 115-113 for the local fighter, 120-109 for Navarro

One of the older fights I remember a big disparity in was in Venezuela in 1965, when Eddie Perkins defended against local star, Carlos Hernandez. Hernandez won a split decision, with two Venezuelan judges scoring it 146-142, 143-142 for the local guy and the great Henry Armstrong scoring it 150-139 for Perkins: a swing of 15 points.

What is it with Navarro fights? Mijares/Navarro was even wider in terms of a gap than Kawashima/Navarro!

DetroitHxC wrote:He was using that one guy's scoring method...Evander?

Seamus wrote:Turns out both Pender vs Robinson bouts had huge discrepancies in the scoring. 15 in the first, 16 in the second.

Not quite Keene/Crabtree, Mijares/Navarro or Czyz/O'Mara territory, though!
:)